ammaratef45/docs.coopcloud.tech
0
0
Fork 0
forked from toolshed/docs.coopcloud.tech
Code Pull Requests Activity

Update FAQ: Caprover, tweak some text

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
3wc
2021-03-12 12:52:49 +02:00
parent 0d08b5ea0d
commit 4a2c3c473c
1 changed files with 24 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
docs/faq.md
View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Co-op Cloud aims to make hosting libre software applications simple for small pr
## Who is behind the project?
The project was started by workers at [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone/) which is a [workers co-operative](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative) providing technologies and infrastructure to empower users to make a positive impact on the world. We use Co-op Cloud in production amongst other systems.
The project was started by workers at [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone/) which is a [worker-owned co-operative](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative). We provide technologies and infrastructure to empower users to make a positive impact on the world. We're using Co-op Cloud in production, amongst other systems.
## Why Co-op Cloud?
@ -36,8 +36,9 @@ Please read our [initial project announcement post](https://autonomic.zone/blog/
## What about `$alternative`?
We have various technical critiques of other similar projects which are already
up-and-running in the ecosystem as they don't necessarily meet our needs as a small tech co-op. However, the Co-op Cloud isn't meant to be a replacement for these others projects. Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see and how that relates to our goals here.
We have various technical critiques of other similar projects which are already up-and-running in the ecosystem, as they don't necessarily meet our needs as a small tech co-op. However, Co-op Cloud isn't meant to be a replacement for these other projects.
Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals
### Cloudron
@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ up-and-running in the ecosystem as they don't necessarily meet our needs as a sm
- 👎 Upstreams libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user.
- 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps.
- 👎 Bit of a [black box](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_box).
### YunoHost
@ -78,6 +80,25 @@ up-and-running in the ecosystem as they don't necessarily meet our needs as a sm
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Not intended for use by hosting providers.
### Caprover
#### 👍
- 👍 Bigger library of applications.
- 👍 Easy set-up using a DigitalOcean one-click app.
- 👍 Works without a domain name or a public IP, in non-HTTPS mode (good for homeservers).
- 👍 Deploy any app with a `docker-compose.yml` file as a "One Click App" via the web interface.
- 👍 Multi-node (multi-server) set-up works by default.
#### 👎
- 👎 Single-file app definition format, difficult to tweak using entrypoint scripts.
- 👎 Nginx instead of Traefik for load-balancing.
- 👎 Command-line client requires NodeJS / `npm`.
- 👎 [Requires 512MB RAM for a single app](https://github.com/caprover/caprover/issues/28).
- 👎 [Backup/restore is "experimental"](https://caprover.com/docs/backup-and-restore.html), and doesn't currently help with backing up Docker volumes.
- 👎 Exposes its bespoke management interface to the internet via HTTPS by default.
### Ansible
#### 👍