forked from toolshed/docs.coopcloud.tech
		
	add links and sentences to Comparisons
This commit is contained in:
		| @ -15,14 +15,16 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Cloudron | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [Cloudron](https://www.cloudron.io) is complete solution for running apps on your own server | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management. | ||||
| - 👍 Large library of apps. | ||||
| - 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth. | ||||
| - 👍 Apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software. | ||||
| - 👎 Libre tier has a single app limit. | ||||
| @ -37,7 +39,9 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### YunoHost | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [YunoHost](https://yunohost.org) is an operating system aiming for the simplest administration of a server | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Lovely web interface for app, domain & user management. | ||||
| - 👍 Bigger library of apps. | ||||
| @ -46,7 +50,7 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
| - 👍 Doesn't require a public-facing IP. | ||||
| - 👍 Supports system-wide mutualisation of resources for apps (e.g. sharing databases by default) | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging. | ||||
| - 👎 Uninstalling apps leaves growing cruft. | ||||
| @ -55,7 +59,9 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Caprover | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [CapRover](https://caprover.com) is an easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for applications | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Bigger library of apps. | ||||
| - 👍 Easy set-up using a DigitalOcean one-click app. | ||||
| @ -63,7 +69,7 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
| - 👍 Deploy any app with a `docker-compose.yml` file as a "One Click App" via the web interface. | ||||
| - 👍 Multi-node (multi-server) set-up works by default. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Single-file app definition format, difficult to tweak using entrypoint scripts. | ||||
| - 👎 Nginx instead of Traefik for load-balancing. | ||||
| @ -74,34 +80,42 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Ansible | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [Ansible](https://www.ansible.com) mature automation and deployment tool. | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Includes server creation and bootstrapping. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles. | ||||
| - 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates. | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Kubernetes | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [Kubernetes](https://kubernetes.io) (or K8s) is a system for automating deployment, scaling, and | ||||
| management of containerized applications. | ||||
|  | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Helm charts are available for some key apps already. | ||||
| - 👍 Scale all the things. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Too big -- requires 3rd party tools to run a single-node instance. | ||||
| - 👎 Not suitable for a small to mid size hosting provider. | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Docker-compose | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [Docker Compose](https://docs.docker.com/compose/) is a tool for defining and running multi-container applications. | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Quick to set up and familiar for many developers. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring. | ||||
| - 👎 Secret storage not available yet. | ||||
| @ -109,11 +123,14 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Doing it Manually (Old School) | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| If you are an absolute Shaman in a Shell and learning new gadgets just slows you down, | ||||
| have it, but maybe ask how old [is old enough](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing_press)? | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Simple - just follow upstream instructions to install and update. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Loads of manual work required for app isolation and backups. | ||||
| - 👎 Array of sysadmin skills required to install and maintain apps. | ||||
| @ -123,14 +140,17 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Stackspin | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [Stackspin](https://www.stackspin.net) deployment and management stack for a | ||||
| handful of popular team collaboration apps. | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Easy instructions to install & upgrade multiple tightly integrated apps. | ||||
| - 👍 Offers a unified SSO user experience. | ||||
| - 👍 Offers tightly integrated logging, monitoring, and maintenance. | ||||
| - 👍 Has a strong focus and attention to security. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging. | ||||
| - 👎 It is not designed to be a general specification. | ||||
| @ -142,12 +162,14 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Maadix | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Pros | ||||
| [Maadix](https://maadix.net) managed hosting and deployment of popular privacy preserving applications. | ||||
|  | ||||
| **Pros** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Nice looking web interface for app, domain & user management. | ||||
| - 👍 Offers a paid hosting service to get up and running easily. | ||||
|  | ||||
| #### Cons | ||||
| **Cons** | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging. | ||||
| - 👎 It is not designed to be a general specification. | ||||
|  | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user