Command-line options ordering is confusing/non-standard? #82

New Issue

decentral1se · 2021-09-07T09:12:10Z

decentral1se commented

2021-09-07 09:12:10 +00:00

Is app backup --all <app> or app --all backup <app> "the norm"? I find the latter weird tbh? This is the default that urfave/cli chooses. I'd prefer to have app backup [command options] [arguments] I think https://github.com/urfave/cli/issues/1113 is relevant for this.

Is `app backup --all <app>` or `app --all backup <app>` "the norm"? I find the latter weird tbh? This is the default that urfave/cli chooses. I'd prefer to have `app backup [command options] [arguments]` I think https://github.com/urfave/cli/issues/1113 is relevant for this.

decentral1se added the

design

label 2021-09-07 09:12:10 +00:00

decentral1se commented

2021-09-07 09:16:34 +00:00

Options are:

drop back to v1 of the library
implement the different ordering handler ourselves (comment)

Seems like quite a bit of work 🤔

Options are: - [ ] drop back to v1 of the library - [ ] implement the different ordering handler ourselves ([comment](https://github.com/urfave/cli/issues/1113#issuecomment-875162737)) Seems like quite a bit of work 🤔

decentral1se referenced this issue

2021-09-07 09:17:35 +00:00

Rejig the docs to use new abra CLI interface #79

decentral1se added this to the (deleted) milestone 2021-09-07 09:17:44 +00:00

decentral1se commented

2021-09-09 08:56:16 +00:00

Looking at:

Looking at: - https://www.mathcs.duq.edu/simon/Primer/essential/attributes/_posix.html - https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Argument-Syntax.html

femmefaytale referenced this issue from toolshed/organising

2021-09-09 13:05:41 +00:00

Command-line options ordering is confusing/non-standard? #147

femmefaytale closed this issue

2021-09-09 13:07:53 +00:00

decentral1se referenced this issue from toolshed/organising

2021-09-10 08:58:40 +00:00

Rejig the docs to use new abra CLI interface #149

Sign in to join this conversation.