Compare commits

..

1 Commits
main ... main

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mayel de Borniol c660bd9227 add FAQ: Running an offline coop-cloud server 2024-04-01 20:14:28 +01:00
79 changed files with 1158 additions and 5070 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM squidfunk/mkdocs-material:9.5.7
FROM squidfunk/mkdocs-material:8.2.5
EXPOSE 8000
@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ WORKDIR /docs
RUN apk add --no-cache curl
RUN pip install -r requirements.txt
RUN pip install mkdocs-awesome-pages-plugin mkdocs-material-extensions

680
LICENSE
View File

@ -1,6 +1,674 @@
Copyright (C) 2022 Co-op Cloud
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the
terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version
published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no
Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included
in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 3, 29 June 2007
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <https://fsf.org/>
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Preamble
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed
to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast,
the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to
share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free
software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the
GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to
any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to
your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have
certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive
or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they
know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps:
(1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License
giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains
that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and
authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as
changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to
authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer
can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of
protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic
pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to
use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we
have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those
products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we
stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions
of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents.
States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of
software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to
avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could
make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that
patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
modification follow.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
0. Definitions.
"This License" refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public License.
"Copyright" also means copyright-like laws that apply to other kinds of
works, such as semiconductor masks.
"The Program" refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this
License. Each licensee is addressed as "you". "Licensees" and
"recipients" may be individuals or organizations.
To "modify" a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work
in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an
exact copy. The resulting work is called a "modified version" of the
earlier work or a work "based on" the earlier work.
A "covered work" means either the unmodified Program or a work based
on the Program.
To "propagate" a work means to do anything with it that, without
permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for
infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a
computer or modifying a private copy. Propagation includes copying,
distribution (with or without modification), making available to the
public, and in some countries other activities as well.
To "convey" a work means any kind of propagation that enables other
parties to make or receive copies. Mere interaction with a user through
a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying.
An interactive user interface displays "Appropriate Legal Notices"
to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently visible
feature that (1) displays an appropriate copyright notice, and (2)
tells the user that there is no warranty for the work (except to the
extent that warranties are provided), that licensees may convey the
work under this License, and how to view a copy of this License. If
the interface presents a list of user commands or options, such as a
menu, a prominent item in the list meets this criterion.
1. Source Code.
The "source code" for a work means the preferred form of the work
for making modifications to it. "Object code" means any non-source
form of a work.
A "Standard Interface" means an interface that either is an official
standard defined by a recognized standards body, or, in the case of
interfaces specified for a particular programming language, one that
is widely used among developers working in that language.
The "System Libraries" of an executable work include anything, other
than the work as a whole, that (a) is included in the normal form of
packaging a Major Component, but which is not part of that Major
Component, and (b) serves only to enable use of the work with that
Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface for which an
implementation is available to the public in source code form. A
"Major Component", in this context, means a major essential component
(kernel, window system, and so on) of the specific operating system
(if any) on which the executable work runs, or a compiler used to
produce the work, or an object code interpreter used to run it.
The "Corresponding Source" for a work in object code form means all
the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable
work) run the object code and to modify the work, including scripts to
control those activities. However, it does not include the work's
System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free
programs which are used unmodified in performing those activities but
which are not part of the work. For example, Corresponding Source
includes interface definition files associated with source files for
the work, and the source code for shared libraries and dynamically
linked subprograms that the work is specifically designed to require,
such as by intimate data communication or control flow between those
subprograms and other parts of the work.
The Corresponding Source need not include anything that users
can regenerate automatically from other parts of the Corresponding
Source.
The Corresponding Source for a work in source code form is that
same work.
2. Basic Permissions.
All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of
copyright on the Program, and are irrevocable provided the stated
conditions are met. This License explicitly affirms your unlimited
permission to run the unmodified Program. The output from running a
covered work is covered by this License only if the output, given its
content, constitutes a covered work. This License acknowledges your
rights of fair use or other equivalent, as provided by copyright law.
You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not
convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise remains
in force. You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose
of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you
with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with
the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do
not control copyright. Those thus making or running the covered works
for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction
and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of
your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you.
Conveying under any other circumstances is permitted solely under
the conditions stated below. Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10
makes it unnecessary.
3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.
No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological
measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article
11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or
similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such
measures.
When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid
circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention
is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to
the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or
modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work's
users, your or third parties' legal rights to forbid circumvention of
technological measures.
4. Conveying Verbatim Copies.
You may convey verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you
receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and
appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice;
keep intact all notices stating that this License and any
non-permissive terms added in accord with section 7 apply to the code;
keep intact all notices of the absence of any warranty; and give all
recipients a copy of this License along with the Program.
You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey,
and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee.
5. Conveying Modified Source Versions.
You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to
produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the
terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified
it, and giving a relevant date.
b) The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is
released under this License and any conditions added under section
7. This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to
"keep intact all notices".
c) You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this
License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy. This
License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7
additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts,
regardless of how they are packaged. This License gives no
permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not
invalidate such permission if you have separately received it.
d) If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display
Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has interactive
interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal Notices, your
work need not make them do so.
A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent
works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work,
and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program,
in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an
"aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not
used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users
beyond what the individual works permit. Inclusion of a covered work
in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other
parts of the aggregate.
6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms
of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the
machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License,
in one of these ways:
a) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
(including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by the
Corresponding Source fixed on a durable physical medium
customarily used for software interchange.
b) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
(including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by a
written offer, valid for at least three years and valid for as
long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product
model, to give anyone who possesses the object code either (1) a
copy of the Corresponding Source for all the software in the
product that is covered by this License, on a durable physical
medium customarily used for software interchange, for a price no
more than your reasonable cost of physically performing this
conveying of source, or (2) access to copy the
Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge.
c) Convey individual copies of the object code with a copy of the
written offer to provide the Corresponding Source. This
alternative is allowed only occasionally and noncommercially, and
only if you received the object code with such an offer, in accord
with subsection 6b.
d) Convey the object code by offering access from a designated
place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the
Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no
further charge. You need not require recipients to copy the
Corresponding Source along with the object code. If the place to
copy the object code is a network server, the Corresponding Source
may be on a different server (operated by you or a third party)
that supports equivalent copying facilities, provided you maintain
clear directions next to the object code saying where to find the
Corresponding Source. Regardless of what server hosts the
Corresponding Source, you remain obligated to ensure that it is
available for as long as needed to satisfy these requirements.
e) Convey the object code using peer-to-peer transmission, provided
you inform other peers where the object code and Corresponding
Source of the work are being offered to the general public at no
charge under subsection 6d.
A separable portion of the object code, whose source code is excluded
from the Corresponding Source as a System Library, need not be
included in conveying the object code work.
A "User Product" is either (1) a "consumer product", which means any
tangible personal property which is normally used for personal, family,
or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for incorporation
into a dwelling. In determining whether a product is a consumer product,
doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of coverage. For a particular
product received by a particular user, "normally used" refers to a
typical or common use of that class of product, regardless of the status
of the particular user or of the way in which the particular user
actually uses, or expects or is expected to use, the product. A product
is a consumer product regardless of whether the product has substantial
commercial, industrial or non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent
the only significant mode of use of the product.
"Installation Information" for a User Product means any methods,
procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install
and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from
a modified version of its Corresponding Source. The information must
suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object
code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because
modification has been made.
If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with, or
specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying occurs as
part of a transaction in which the right of possession and use of the
User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a
fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is characterized), the
Corresponding Source conveyed under this section must be accompanied
by the Installation Information. But this requirement does not apply
if neither you nor any third party retains the ability to install
modified object code on the User Product (for example, the work has
been installed in ROM).
The requirement to provide Installation Information does not include a
requirement to continue to provide support service, warranty, or updates
for a work that has been modified or installed by the recipient, or for
the User Product in which it has been modified or installed. Access to a
network may be denied when the modification itself materially and
adversely affects the operation of the network or violates the rules and
protocols for communication across the network.
Corresponding Source conveyed, and Installation Information provided,
in accord with this section must be in a format that is publicly
documented (and with an implementation available to the public in
source code form), and must require no special password or key for
unpacking, reading or copying.
7. Additional Terms.
"Additional permissions" are terms that supplement the terms of this
License by making exceptions from one or more of its conditions.
Additional permissions that are applicable to the entire Program shall
be treated as though they were included in this License, to the extent
that they are valid under applicable law. If additional permissions
apply only to part of the Program, that part may be used separately
under those permissions, but the entire Program remains governed by
this License without regard to the additional permissions.
When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option
remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of
it. (Additional permissions may be written to require their own
removal in certain cases when you modify the work.) You may place
additional permissions on material, added by you to a covered work,
for which you have or can give appropriate copyright permission.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material you
add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright holders of
that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms:
a) Disclaiming warranty or limiting liability differently from the
terms of sections 15 and 16 of this License; or
b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or
author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal
Notices displayed by works containing it; or
c) Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material, or
requiring that modified versions of such material be marked in
reasonable ways as different from the original version; or
d) Limiting the use for publicity purposes of names of licensors or
authors of the material; or
e) Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some
trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
f) Requiring indemnification of licensors and authors of that
material by anyone who conveys the material (or modified versions of
it) with contractual assumptions of liability to the recipient, for
any liability that these contractual assumptions directly impose on
those licensors and authors.
All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further
restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you
received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is
governed by this License along with a term that is a further
restriction, you may remove that term. If a license document contains
a further restriction but permits relicensing or conveying under this
License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms
of that license document, provided that the further restriction does
not survive such relicensing or conveying.
If you add terms to a covered work in accord with this section, you
must place, in the relevant source files, a statement of the
additional terms that apply to those files, or a notice indicating
where to find the applicable terms.
Additional terms, permissive or non-permissive, may be stated in the
form of a separately written license, or stated as exceptions;
the above requirements apply either way.
8. Termination.
You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly
provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to propagate or
modify it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under
this License (including any patent licenses granted under the third
paragraph of section 11).
However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your
license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a)
provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly and
finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the copyright
holder fails to notify you of the violation by some reasonable means
prior to 60 days after the cessation.
Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is
reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the
violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have
received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from that
copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after
your receipt of the notice.
Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate the
licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from you under
this License. If your rights have been terminated and not permanently
reinstated, you do not qualify to receive new licenses for the same
material under section 10.
9. Acceptance Not Required for Having Copies.
You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or
run a copy of the Program. Ancillary propagation of a covered work
occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer transmission
to receive a copy likewise does not require acceptance. However,
nothing other than this License grants you permission to propagate or
modify any covered work. These actions infringe copyright if you do
not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or propagating a
covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so.
10. Automatic Licensing of Downstream Recipients.
Each time you convey a covered work, the recipient automatically
receives a license from the original licensors, to run, modify and
propagate that work, subject to this License. You are not responsible
for enforcing compliance by third parties with this License.
An "entity transaction" is a transaction transferring control of an
organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an
organization, or merging organizations. If propagation of a covered
work results from an entity transaction, each party to that
transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever
licenses to the work the party's predecessor in interest had or could
give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the
Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if
the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts.
You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the
rights granted or affirmed under this License. For example, you may
not impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for exercise of
rights granted under this License, and you may not initiate litigation
(including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that
any patent claim is infringed by making, using, selling, offering for
sale, or importing the Program or any portion of it.
11. Patents.
A "contributor" is a copyright holder who authorizes use under this
License of the Program or a work on which the Program is based. The
work thus licensed is called the contributor's "contributor version".
A contributor's "essential patent claims" are all patent claims
owned or controlled by the contributor, whether already acquired or
hereafter acquired, that would be infringed by some manner, permitted
by this License, of making, using, or selling its contributor version,
but do not include claims that would be infringed only as a
consequence of further modification of the contributor version. For
purposes of this definition, "control" includes the right to grant
patent sublicenses in a manner consistent with the requirements of
this License.
Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free
patent license under the contributor's essential patent claims, to
make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and
propagate the contents of its contributor version.
In the following three paragraphs, a "patent license" is any express
agreement or commitment, however denominated, not to enforce a patent
(such as an express permission to practice a patent or covenant not to
sue for patent infringement). To "grant" such a patent license to a
party means to make such an agreement or commitment not to enforce a
patent against the party.
If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent license,
and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available for anyone
to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this License, through a
publicly available network server or other readily accessible means,
then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so
available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the
patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner
consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent
license to downstream recipients. "Knowingly relying" means you have
actual knowledge that, but for the patent license, your conveying the
covered work in a country, or your recipient's use of the covered work
in a country, would infringe one or more identifiable patents in that
country that you have reason to believe are valid.
If, pursuant to or in connection with a single transaction or
arrangement, you convey, or propagate by procuring conveyance of, a
covered work, and grant a patent license to some of the parties
receiving the covered work authorizing them to use, propagate, modify
or convey a specific copy of the covered work, then the patent license
you grant is automatically extended to all recipients of the covered
work and works based on it.
A patent license is "discriminatory" if it does not include within
the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is
conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are
specifically granted under this License. You may not convey a covered
work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third party that is
in the business of distributing software, under which you make payment
to the third party based on the extent of your activity of conveying
the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the
parties who would receive the covered work from you, a discriminatory
patent license (a) in connection with copies of the covered work
conveyed by you (or copies made from those copies), or (b) primarily
for and in connection with specific products or compilations that
contain the covered work, unless you entered into that arrangement,
or that patent license was granted, prior to 28 March 2007.
Nothing in this License shall be construed as excluding or limiting
any implied license or other defenses to infringement that may
otherwise be available to you under applicable patent law.
12. No Surrender of Others' Freedom.
If conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or
otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not
excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot convey a
covered work so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this
License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may
not convey it at all. For example, if you agree to terms that obligate you
to collect a royalty for further conveying from those to whom you convey
the Program, the only way you could satisfy both those terms and this
License would be to refrain entirely from conveying the Program.
13. Use with the GNU Affero General Public License.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, you have
permission to link or combine any covered work with a work licensed
under version 3 of the GNU Affero General Public License into a single
combined work, and to convey the resulting work. The terms of this
License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work,
but the special requirements of the GNU Affero General Public License,
section 13, concerning interaction through a network will apply to the
combination as such.
14. Revised Versions of this License.
The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of
the GNU General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will
be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to
address new problems or concerns.
Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the
Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU General
Public License "or any later version" applies to it, you have the
option of following the terms and conditions either of that numbered
version or of any later version published by the Free Software
Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of the
GNU General Public License, you may choose any version ever published
by the Free Software Foundation.
If the Program specifies that a proxy can decide which future
versions of the GNU General Public License can be used, that proxy's
public statement of acceptance of a version permanently authorizes you
to choose that version for the Program.
Later license versions may give you additional or different
permissions. However, no additional obligations are imposed on any
author or copyright holder as a result of your choosing to follow a
later version.
15. Disclaimer of Warranty.
THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY
APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT
HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY
OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM
IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF
ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
16. Limitation of Liability.
IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING
WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MODIFIES AND/OR CONVEYS
THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY
GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE
USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF
DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD
PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS),
EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
SUCH DAMAGES.
17. Interpretation of Sections 15 and 16.
If the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of liability provided
above cannot be given local legal effect according to their terms,
reviewing courts shall apply local law that most closely approximates
an absolute waiver of all civil liability in connection with the
Program, unless a warranty or assumption of liability accompanies a
copy of the Program in return for a fee.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs
If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.
To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest
to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
state the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least
the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.
<one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.>
Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.
If the program does terminal interaction, make it output a short
notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
<program> Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.
The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate
parts of the General Public License. Of course, your program's commands
might be different; for a GUI interface, you would use an "about box".
You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or school,
if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary.
For more information on this, and how to apply and follow the GNU GPL, see
<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program
into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you
may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with
the library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General
Public License instead of this License. But first, please read
<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html>.

View File

@ -1,21 +1,13 @@
# docs.coopcloud.tech :open_book:
# docs.coopcloud.tech
[![Build Status](https://build.coopcloud.tech/api/badges/coop-cloud/docs.coopcloud.tech/status.svg)](https://build.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/docs.coopcloud.tech)
View: [docs.coopcloud.tech](https://docs.coopcloud.tech)
> https://docs.coopcloud.tech
## Developing / Hacking
Co-op Cloud's docs are created with the [mkdocs-material](https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/) framework.
To install dependencies and serve local build of site, simply run:
## hacking
```
make
```
Useful docs for theming and content reference:
- [Changing the colors](https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/setup/changing-the-colors/)
- [Reference](https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/reference/)
Theme docs are [here](https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/setup/changing-the-colors/) and [there](https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/reference/).

View File

@ -1,170 +0,0 @@
{#-
This file was copied from the Material theme
You can find the file in https://raw.githubusercontent.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/master/src/partials/header.html
-#}
<!--
Copyright (c) 2016-2023 Martin Donath <martin.donath@squidfunk.com>
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
IN THE SOFTWARE.
-->
<!-- Determine base classes -->
{% set class = "md-header" %}
{% if "navigation.tabs.sticky" in features %}
{% set class = class ~ " md-header--shadow md-header--lifted" %}
{% elif "navigation.tabs" not in features %}
{% set class = class ~ " md-header--shadow" %}
{% endif %}
<!-- Header -->
<header class="{{ class }}" data-md-component="header">
<nav
class="md-header__inner md-grid"
aria-label="{{ lang.t('header') }}"
>
<!-- Link to home -->
<a
href="{{ config.extra.homepage | d(nav.homepage.url, true) | url }}"
title="{{ config.site_name | e }}"
class="md-header__button md-logo"
aria-label="{{ config.site_name }}"
data-md-component="logo"
>
{% include "partials/logo.html" %}
</a>
<!-- Button to open drawer -->
<label class="md-header__button md-icon" for="__drawer">
{% include ".icons/material/menu" ~ ".svg" %}
</label>
<!-- Header title -->
<div class="md-header__title" data-md-component="header-title">
<div class="md-header__ellipsis">
<div class="md-header__topic">
<span class="md-ellipsis">
{{ config.site_name }}
</span>
</div>
<div class="md-header__topic" data-md-component="header-topic">
<span class="md-ellipsis">
{% if page.meta and page.meta.title %}
{{ page.meta.title }}
{% else %}
{{ page.title }}
{% endif %}
</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Color palette -->
{% if config.theme.palette %}
{% if not config.theme.palette is mapping %}
<form class="md-header__option" data-md-component="palette">
{% for option in config.theme.palette %}
{% set scheme = option.scheme | d("default", true) %}
{% set primary = option.primary | d("indigo", true) %}
{% set accent = option.accent | d("indigo", true) %}
<input
class="md-option"
data-md-color-media="{{ option.media }}"
data-md-color-scheme="{{ scheme | replace(' ', '-') }}"
data-md-color-primary="{{ primary | replace(' ', '-') }}"
data-md-color-accent="{{ accent | replace(' ', '-') }}"
{% if option.toggle %}
aria-label="{{ option.toggle.name }}"
{% else %}
aria-hidden="true"
{% endif %}
type="radio"
name="__palette"
id="__palette_{{ loop.index }}"
/>
{% if option.toggle %}
<label
class="md-header__button md-icon"
title="{{ option.toggle.name }}"
for="__palette_{{ loop.index0 or loop.length }}"
hidden
>
{% include ".icons/" ~ option.toggle.icon ~ ".svg" %}
</label>
{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
</form>
{% endif %}
{% endif %}
<!-- Site language selector -->
{% if config.extra.alternate %}
<div class="md-header__option">
<div class="md-select">
{% set icon = config.theme.icon.alternate or "material/translate" %}
<button
class="md-header__button md-icon"
aria-label="{{ lang.t('select.language') }}"
>
{% include ".icons/" ~ icon ~ ".svg" %}
</button>
<div class="md-select__inner">
<ul class="md-select__list">
{% for alt in config.extra.alternate %}
<li class="md-select__item">
<a
href="{{ alt.link | url }}"
hreflang="{{ alt.lang }}"
class="md-select__link"
>
{{ alt.name }}
</a>
</li>
{% endfor %}
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
{% endif %}
<!-- Button to open search modal -->
{% if "material/search" in config.plugins %}
<label class="md-header__button md-icon" for="__search">
{% include ".icons/material/magnify.svg" %}
</label>
<!-- Search interface -->
{% include "partials/search.html" %}
{% endif %}
<!-- Repository information -->
{% if config.repo_url %}
<div class="md-header__source">
{% include "partials/source.html" %}
</div>
{% endif %}
</nav>
<!-- Navigation tabs (sticky) -->
{% if "navigation.tabs.sticky" in features %}
{% if "navigation.tabs" in features %}
{% include "partials/tabs.html" %}
{% endif %}
{% endif %}
</header>

View File

@ -1,148 +0,0 @@
---
title: Cheat sheet
---
# Abra cheat sheet
!!! info
not all flags are listed here.
### Abra Autocomplete
Definitely set up autocomplete or you'll be sad :sob: `abra` supports `bash`,
`zsh`, and `fizsh` just run
```
$ abra autocomplete bash
```
### Create & deploy an app
```
$ abra app new $RECIPE`
```
Optional flags: `-s/--server`, `-D/--domain`, `-S/--secrets`, `-p/--pass`
```
$ abra app config $APPNAME
$ abra app secret generate $APPNAME -a
```
Optional flags: `-p/--pass`, `-a/--all`
```
$ abra app deploy $APPNAME
```
Optional flags: `-f/--force`, `-C/--chaos`
### Restarting an app
To run `restart` you need to specify the `<service>` name with the default being `app`
```
$ abra app restart <domain> app
```
### Undeploy & remove an app
Back up any data you don't want to lose
```
$ abra app undeploy $APPNAME
$ abra app rm --volumes $APPNAME
```
Optional flags: `-f/--force`, `-V/--volumes`
### Upgrade abra
To upgrade `abra` itself, run the following:
```
$ abra upgrade
```
Option flags: `--rc`
### Upgrade a recipe
```
$ abra recipe upgrade $RECIPE`
```
Option flags: `-x,y,z/--major,minor,patch`
```
$ abra recipe sync $RECIPE
```
Optional flags: `-x,y,z`
```
$ abra recipe release $RECIPE [$VERSION]
```
Optional flags: `-p/--publish`, `-r/--dry-run`, `-x,y,z`
### Manually restoring app data
To manually restore app data or configurations, you can use the `cp` command as:
```
$ abra app cp <domain> path/to/.app.conf app:/home/app/
$ abra app cp <domain> path/to/data app:/home/app/
```
*Note: the destination must be a directory and not a filename*
### Make changes to a recipe
Edit the files in `~/.abra/recipe/$RECIPENAME`
Deploy the changed version to your test instance
Determine how serious your change is (semver.org for reference)
```
$ abra recipe release $RECIPE [$VERSION]
```
### Advanced Listing using `jq`
Several `abra` commands can output JSON formatted tables, and can thus be queried and filtered with the tool [jq](https://stedolan.github.io/jq/ "jq JSON Query tool"). We can also format these outputs with [tv](https://github.com/uzimaru0000/tv "tv Table Viewer") into a pretty table.
Currently, `abra recipe ls`, `abra server ls`, and `abra app ls` support the `-m` machine readable output flag which outputs JSON.
#### Filter recipes by "category"
```
$ abra recipe ls -m | jq '[.[] | select(.category == "Utilities") ]' | tv
```
As you can see we, we're selecting all recipes where category is "Utilities".
#### Filter apps by state `deployed`
!!! info
`abra app ls -S` queries each server in your added server list, where as without the `-S` it only lists from your local copy of the sever files (thus providing no information about actual state of the apps)
!!! info
`abra app ls` lists apps grouped into a server object, with statistics about the server. In `jq` we can select the entire apps list with `.[].apps[]`.
```
$ abra app ls -m -S |jq '[.[].apps[] | select(.status == "deployed") | del(.upgrade)]' |tv
```
The `del(.upgrade)` filter filters out available versions for the recipe in question for that row. It could be useful to leave in if you want a list of deployed apps that need an upgrade.

View File

@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
---
title: Design
---
## Design Prime Directives
* De-coupling: it should be possible to use the recipes without relying on
`abra`. The commons of recipes should live and function independently of
`abra`.

View File

@ -2,19 +2,6 @@
title: Hack
---
## Contributing
Welcome to Hacking the Planet with `abra`! We're looking forward to see what
you come up. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask 💖 If any of your
changes seems a bit controversial, it's probably to come have a chat first to
avoid heartache.
In general, we're into the idea of "Optimistic Merging" (instead of
"Pessimistic Merging" based on our understanding of
[C4](https://hintjens.gitbooks.io/social-architecture/content/chapter4.html)
(described further down under "Development Process" and also [in this blog
post](http://hintjens.com/blog:106)).
## Quick start
Get a fresh copy of the `abra` source code from [here](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra).
@ -23,240 +10,27 @@ Install [direnv](https://direnv.net), run `cp .envrc.sample .envrc`, then run `d
Install [Go >= 1.16](https://golang.org/doc/install) and then:
- `make build` to build. If this fails, run `go mod tidy`.
- `make build` to build
- `./abra` to run commands
- `make test` will run tests
- `make install-abra` will install abra to `$GOPATH/bin`
- `make install-kadabra` will install kadabra to `$GOPATH/bin`
- `make install` will install it to `$GOPATH/bin`
- `go get <package>` and `go mod tidy` to add a new dependency
Our [Drone CI configuration](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/.drone.yml) runs a number of checks on each pushed commit. See the [Makefile](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/Makefile) for more handy targets.
Our [Drone CI configuration](.drone.yml) runs a number of sanity on each pushed commit. See the [Makefile](./Makefile) for more handy targets.
Please use the [conventional commit format](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) for your commits so we can automate our change log.
## Unit tests
### Run tests
Run the entire suite.
```
make test
```
### Filter tests
Run a specific test.
```
go test ./pkg/recipe -v -run TestGetVersionLabelLocalDoesNotUseTimeoutLabel
```
## Integration tests
### Install dependencies
We use [`bats`](https://bats-core.readthedocs.io/en/stable/), you can install
the required dependencies with the following. You also need a working
installation of Docker and Go (not covered in this section).
```
apt install bats-file bats-assert bats-support jq make git
```
Unfortunately, the latest `bats` version in Debian stable does not have the
"filter tests by tags" feature, which is very handy for running a subset of the
tests. For this, we need to install `bats` from source. It's easy.
```
apt purge -y bats
git clone https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core.git
cd bats-core
sudo ./install.sh /usr/local
```
### Setup Test Server
For many tests an actual server is needed, where apps can be deployed. You can
either use a local one or a remote test server.
#### With remote test server
```
export ABRA_TEST_DOMAIN="test.example.com"
export ABRA_DIR="$HOME/.abra_test"
```
`ABRA_TEST_DOMAIN` should also have a DNS A record for `*.test.example.com`
which points to the same server so that the test suite can deploy apps freely.
It's advised that you re-use the same server and therefore the same Traefik
deployment for running your integration tests. The test suite does not deploy
Traefik for you. Then you'll have more stable results.
You probably don't want to run the entire test suite though, it takes a while.
Try the following for starters.
#### With local swarm
When running the test suite localy you need a running docker swarm setup:
```
docker swarm init
docker network create -d overlay proxy
```
To use the local swarm set the foloowing env var:
```
export TEST_SERVER=default
export ABRA_DIR="$HOME/.abra_test"
```
### Run tests
Now you can run the whole test suite:
```
bats -Tp tests/integration
```
Or you can run a single test file:
```
bats -Tp tests/integration/autocomplete.bats
```
### Tagging tests
When a test actually deploys something to a server, we tag it with the following:
```
# bats test_tags=slow
@test "..." {
...
}
```
Then we can use [filters](#filter-tests) (see below) to pick out a subset of
tests which do/do not use a live server. Feel free to come up with your own
tags. See the `bats-core`
[docs](https://bats-core.readthedocs.io/en/stable/writing-tests.html#tagging-tests)
for more.
### Filter tests
You can run a specific file.
```
bats -Tp tests/integration/autocomplete.bats
```
For example, if you want to check that all `abra recipe ...` tests remain working.
```
bats -Tp tests/integration/recipe_*
```
You can filter on test names to run specific kinds of tests.
```
bats -Tp tests/integration --filter "validate app argument"
```
You can filter on tags.
```
bats -Tp tests/integration --filter-tags "\!slow" # only fast tests
bats -Tp tests/integration --filter-tags "slow" # only slow tests
```
You can also only run the previously failed tests.
```
bats -TP tests/integration --filter-status failed
```
### Debug tests
If you're running into issues and want to debug stuff, you can pass `-x` to
`bats` to trace all commands run in the test. You can add `echo '...' >&3`
debug statements to your test to output stuff also.
## Using the `abra` public API
Warning, there is currently no stability promise for the `abra` public API! Most of the internals are exposed in order to allow a free hand for developers to try build stuff. If people start to build things then we can start the discussion on what is useful to have open/closed and keep stable etc. Please let us know if you depend on the APIs!
The `pkg.go.dev` documentation is [here](https://pkg.go.dev/coopcloud.tech/abra). Here's a brief example to get you going:
```go
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"log"
abraClient "coopcloud.tech/abra/pkg/client"
dockerClient "github.com/docker/docker/client"
)
func getClient(serverName string) (*dockerClient.Client, error) {
cl, err := abraClient.New(serverName)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("getClient: %s", err)
}
return cl, nil
}
func main() {
cl, err := getClient("foo.example.com")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
// do stuff with the client...
// https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/docker/docker/client
}
```
Some tools that are making use of the API so far are:
* [`kadabra`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/cmd/kadabra/main.go)
## Cross-compiling
If there's no official release for the architecture you use, you can cross-compile `abra` very easily. Clone the source code from [here](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra) and then:
- enter the `abra` directory
- run `git tag -l` to see the list of tags, choose the latest one
- run `git checkout <tag>`, where `<tag>` is the latest version
- run `GOOS=<os> GOARCH=<arch> [GOARM=<arm>] make build`. You only have to use `GOARM` if you're building for ARM, this specifies the ARM version (5,6,7 etc). See [this](https://go.dev/doc/install/source#environment) for a list of all supported OS'es and architectures.
## Building in Docker
If you are living under a curse of constant Go environment problems, it might be easier to build `abra` using Docker:
```
sudo setenforce 0 # SELinux probably won't allow Docker to access files
docker run -it -v $PWD:/abra golang:1.19.6 bash
cd /abra
. .envrc
git config --global --add safe.directory /abra # work around funky file permissions
make build
```
## Release management
We use [goreleaser](https://goreleaser.com) to help us automate releases. We use [semver](https://semver.org) for versioning all releases of the tool. While we are still in the public beta release phase, we will maintain a `0.y.z-beta` format. Change logs are generated from our commit logs. We are still working this out and aim to refine our release praxis as we go.
We use [goreleaser](https://goreleaser.com) to help us automate releases. We use [semver](https://semver.org) for versioning all releases of the tool. While we are still in the public alpha release phase, we will maintain a `0.y.z-alpha` format. Change logs are generated from our commit logs. We are still working this out and aim to refine our release praxis as we go.
For developers, while using this `-beta` format, the `y` part is the "major" version part. So, if you make breaking changes, you increment that and _not_ the `x` part. So, if you're on `0.1.0-beta`, then you'd go to `0.1.1-beta` for a backwards compatible change and `0.2.0-beta` for a backwards incompatible change.
For developers, while using this `-alpha` format, the `y` part is the "major" version part. So, if you make breaking changes, you increment that and _not_ the `x` part. So, if you're on `0.1.0-alpha`, then you'd go to `0.1.1-alpha` for a backwards compatible change and `0.2.0-alpha` for a backwards incompatible change.
### Making a new release
- Run the [integration test suite](#integration-tests) and the unit tests (`make test`) (takes a while!)
- Change `ABRA_VERSION` in [`scripts/installer/installer`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/scripts/installer/installer) to match the new tag (use [semver](https://semver.org))
- Commit that change (e.g. `git commit -m 'chore: publish next tag x.y.z-beta'`)
- Make a new tag (e.g. `git tag -a x.y.z-beta`)
- Change `ABRA_VERSION` to match the new tag in [`scripts`](./scripts/installer/installer) (use [semver](https://semver.org))
- Commit that change (e.g. `git commit -m 'chore: publish next tag x.y.z-alpha'`)
- Make a new tag (e.g. `git tag -a x.y.z-alpha`)
- Push the new tag (e.g. `git push && git push --tags`)
- Wait until the build finishes on [build.coopcloud.tech](https://build.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra)
- Deploy the new installer script (e.g. `cd ./scripts/installer && make`)
@ -266,12 +40,8 @@ For developers, while using this `-beta` format, the `y` part is the "major" ver
### `godotenv`
We maintain a fork of [godotenv](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/godotenv) because we need inline comment parsing for environment files. You can upgrade the version here by running `go get git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/godotenv@0<COMMID>` where `<commit>` is the latest commit you want to pin to. See [`abra#391`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/pulls/391) for more.
We maintain a fork of [godotenv](https://github.com/Autonomic-Cooperative/godotenv) because we need inline comment parsing for environment files. You can upgrade the version here by running `go get github.com/Autonomic-Cooperative/godotenv@<commit>` where `<commit>` is the latest commit you want to pin to. At time of writing, `go get github.com/Autonomic-Cooperative/godotenv@b031ea1211e7fd297af4c7747ffb562ebe00cd33` is the command you want to run to maintain the above functionality.
### `docker/client`
A number of modules in [pkg/upstream](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/pkg/upstream) are copy/pasta'd from the upstream [docker/docker/client](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/docker/docker/client). We had to do this because upstream are not exposing their API as public.
### `github.com/schultz-is/passgen`
Due to [`coop-cloud/organising#358`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/358).
A number of modules in [pkg/upstream](./pkg/upstream) are copy/pasta'd from the upstream [docker/docker/client](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/docker/docker/client). We had to do this because upstream are not exposing their API as public.

View File

@ -2,13 +2,7 @@
title: Abra
---
<a href="https://github.com/egonelbre/gophers"><img align="right" width="250" src="https://github.com/egonelbre/gophers/raw/master/.thumb/sketch/adventure/poking-fire.png"/></a>
[![Build Status](https://build.coopcloud.tech/api/badges/coop-cloud/abra/status.svg?ref=refs/heads/main)](https://build.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra)
[![Go Report Card](https://goreportcard.com/badge/git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra)](https://goreportcard.com/report/git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra)
[![Go Reference](https://pkg.go.dev/badge/coopcloud.tech/abra.svg)](https://pkg.go.dev/coopcloud.tech/abra)
`abra` is the flagship client & command-line for Co-op Cloud. It has been developed specifically for the purpose of making the day-to-day operations of operators and maintainers pleasant & convenient. It is libre software, written in Go and maintained and extended by the community :heart:
`abra` is our flagship client & command-line tool which has been developed specifically in the context of the Co-op Cloud project for the purpose of making day-to-day operations for [operators](/operators/) and [maintainers](/maintainers/) as convenient as possible. It is libre software, written in [Go](https://go.dev/) and maintained and extended by the community :heart:
Once you've got `abra` installed, you can start your own Co-op Cloud deployment. `abra` allows you to create, deploy and maintain libre software apps. It supports working with existing servers or can create new servers (supported providers: [Servers.coop](https://servers.coop/) & [Hetzner](https://hetzner.com)). It can also help you manage your DNS configuration (supported providers: [Gandi](https://gandi.net)).

View File

@ -2,76 +2,18 @@
title: Install
---
## Installer script source
You can view that [here](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/scripts/installer/installer).
## Installer prerequisites
* `tar`
* `wget`
* `curl` (only if using `curl` method below)
## Stable release
### Wget
```
wget -q -O - https://install.abra.coopcloud.tech | bash
```
### Curl
```
curl https://install.abra.coopcloud.tech | bash
```
## Release candidate
### Wget
```
wget -q -O - https://install.abra.coopcloud.tech | bash -s -- --rc
```
### Curl
```
curl https://install.abra.coopcloud.tech | bash -s -- --rc
```
## Manual verification
## Installer script source
You can download the `abra` binary yourself from the [releases
page](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/releases) along with the
`checksums.txt` file and verify it's integrity with the following command.
```bash
sha256sum -c checksums.txt --ignore-missing
```
If you see a line starting with `abra_...` which matches the filename you downloaded and it ends with `OK` - you're good to go!
```
abra_X.X.X-beta_linux_x86_64: OK
```
Otherwise, you downloaded a corrupted file and you should re-download it.
## Compile from source
Follow the guide [here](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/abra/hack/)
## Using Docker
```
docker run \
-v $HOME/.abra:/.abra \
git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra app ls
```
!!! note
If you're using symlinks, e.g. for [sharing
`~/.abra`](/operators/handbook/#sharing-abra), add more `-v` options for
each directory you're symlinking to, e.g. `-v
$HOME/Projects/CoopCloud/apps:/home/user/Projects/CoopCloud/apps`
You can view that [here](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/scripts/installer/installer).

View File

@ -4,16 +4,8 @@ title: Quick start
There are a few ways to get started, here are some entrypoints listed below:
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- If you're new around here and you'd like to learn how to deploy apps with `abra`, then a good place to start is the [new operators tutorial](/operators/tutorial). If you've already deployed some apps and would like to learn how to maintain them, then the [operators handbook](/operators/handbook) is the right place.
- __Operators__
If you're new around here and you'd like to learn how to deploy apps with `abra`, then a good place to start is the [new operators tutorial](/operators/tutorial). If you've already deployed some apps and would like to learn how to maintain them, then the [operators handbook](/operators/handbook) is the right place.
- __Maintainers__
If you're installing `abra` so you can do recipe packaging, take a look at the [new maintainers tutorial](/maintainers/tutorial). `abra` can help you check the quality of the recipe you've packaged and help you publish it to the public recipe catalogue. Then others can deploy your configuration :rocket:
</div>
- If you're installing `abra` so you can do recipe packaging, take a look at the [new maintainers tutorial](/maintainers/tutorial). `abra` can help you check the quality of the recipe you've packaged and help you publish it to the public recipe catalogue. Then others can deploy your configuration :rocket:
If you run into any issues, please see the [troubleshooting page](/abra/trouble) :bomb:

View File

@ -1,107 +0,0 @@
---
title: Recipes
---
_Recipes_ are what we call the configuration file used to deploy apps with our `abra` CLI tool. A longer explanation is in the [glossary](/glossary#recipe). Our _Catalogue_ is a web interface for exploring the currently available configurations, therefore which apps can be deployed.
### Catalogue
Our catalogue is located at [recipes.coopcloud.tech](https://recipes.coopcloud.tech/) and regularly updated :cooking:
[Browse Our Recipes](https://recipes.coopcloud.tech/){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
The catalogue is a helpful place to easily understand the status of app recipes and the link to the source-code of the recipe. To understand the various scores on recipes, read further.
## Status, Features, Score
Each recipe `README.md` has a "metadata" section, to help communicate the overall status of the recipe, and which features are supported. Here's an example, from [the Wordpress recipe](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/wordpress/):
```
<!-- metadata -->
* **Category**: Apps
* **Status**: 3, stable
* **Image**: [`wordpress`](https://hub.docker.com/_/wordpress), 4, upstream
* **Healthcheck**: Yes
* **Backups**: Yes
* **Email**: 3
* **Tests**: 2
* **SSO**: No
<!-- endmetadata -->
```
Currently, recipe maintainers need to update the scores in this section manually. The specific meanings of the scores are:
### Status (overall score)
| Score | Description |
| ----- | ------------------------------------ |
| [5](#){ .md-score .md-score-5 } | Everything in 4 + Single-Sign-On |
| [4](#){ .md-score .md-score-4 } | Upstream image, backups, email, healthcheck, integration testing |
| [3](#){ .md-score .md-score-3 } | Upstream image, missing 1-2 items from 4 |
| [2](#){ .md-score .md-score-2 } | Missing 3-4 items from 4 or no upstream image |
| [1](#){ .md-score .md-score-1 } | Alpha |
### Image
| Score | Description |
| ----- | ------------------------------------ |
| 4 | Official upstream image |
| 3 | Semi-official / actively-maintained image |
| 2 | 3rd-party image |
| 1 | Our own custom image |
### Email
| Score | Description |
| ----- | ------------------------------------ |
| 3 | Automatic (using environment variables) |
| 2 | Mostly automatic |
| 1 | Manual |
| 0 | None |
| N/A | App doesn't send email |
### CI (Continuous Integration)
| Score | Description |
| ----- | ------------------------------------ |
| 3 | As 2, plus healthcheck |
| 2 | Auto secrets + networks |
| 1 | Basic deployment using `stack-ssh-deploy`, manual secrets + networks |
| 0 | None |
### Single-Sign-On
| Score | Description |
| ----- | ------------------------------------ |
| 3 | Automatic (using environment variables) |
| 2 | Mostly automatic |
| 1 | Manual |
| 0 | None |
| N/A | App doesn't support SSO |
## Requesting Recipes
If you'd like to see a new recipe packaged there are two options for you. First is to contribte one as a _Maintainer_
The second option is to make a request on the [`recipes-wishlist`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/recipes-wishlist) repository issue tracker.
If no one is around to help, you can always take a run at it yourself, go to the [Maintainers](/maintainers/) section to help you on your way.
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- __Contribute Recipes__
Do you not see the recipe for the app you use or make? We especially love recipe maintainers :heart:
[Create a Recipe](/maintainers/){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Request A Recipe__
Don't feel up to the task? Open an issue in the `recipes-wishlist` repository
[Request Recipe](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/recipes-wishlist){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
</div>
We've seen nice things happen when the requesters are also willing to take an active role in testing the new recipe. Teaming up with whoever volunteers to help do the packaging is best.

View File

@ -4,31 +4,55 @@ title: Troubleshoot
## Where do I report `abra` bugs / feature requests?
You can use [this issue tracker](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/new/choose).
You can use [this issue tracker](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/issues/new).
## SSH connection issues?
When you run `abra server add <host>`, `abra` will read from your `~/.ssh/config` and try to match a `Host <host>` entry. If you can `ssh <host>` then you should be able to `abra server add <host>`.
`abra` tries its best to learn from your system configuration or command-line input what the correct SSH connection details are for a given server. This doesn't always work out. Here are some things to try to fix it.
For example, if you do `abra server add example.com`, you should have a matching entry that looks like this:
First, ensure that you can `ssh <my-server>` and things work. If you can't SSH to your server then neither can `abra`. If you have a password protected SSH key, then you'll need to make sure your `ssh-agent` is running and you've added your SSH key part:
```
Host example.com
Hostname example.com
User exampleUser
Port 12345
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/example@somewhere
eval $(ssh-agent -k)
ssh-add ~/.ssh/<my-secret-key-part>
ssh-add -L # validate loaded keys
```
and your IdentityFile should be added to the authentication agent:
The first thing `abra` will check for is the connection details listed in `abra server ls`. Check those details are correct. If you haven't managed to `abra server add` your server yet, then no details will appear in that list. You may need to take a look at [this entry](/abra/trouble/#abra-server-ls-shows-the-wrong-details) to clean up old values depending on your situation.
`abra` will then try to read your `~/.ssh/config` entries and match the server domain against a `Host` entry. So, if you do `ssh myserver.com` and you have:
```
ssh-add ~/.ssh/example@somewhere
Host myserver.com
Hostname myserver.com
User myuser
Port 222
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/my@myserver.com
```
Then `abra` should have all it needs to build a working SSH connection. You can validate this by passing `-d/--debug` to your commands.
However, sometimes, you use an alias in your SSH configuration, say:
```
Host mys
...
```
So that you can simply type `ssh mys`. `abra` won't be able to match against those entries to discover connection details. You can use aliases to remedy this:
```
Host mys, myserver.com
...
```
`abra` will try to read the relevant `IdentityFile` entry from your `~/.ssh/config` but if it can't make a match, it will rely on your key being added to the `ssh-agent`.
Due to a limitation in our implementation, `abra` uses 2 methods of making SSH connections, the main `abra` -> `remote docker` connection using `/usr/bin/ssh` which can seamlessly pick up loaded SSH keys. However, for SSH host key checking, `abra` uses an SSH library & Golang SSH internals. We're working on resolving this to a single implementation but it is tricky work.
## "abra server ls" shows the wrong details?
You can use `abra server rm` to remove the incorrect details. Make sure to take a backup of your `~/.abra/servers/<domain>` first. You can then try to re-create by using `abra server add ...` again.
You can use `abra server rm` to remove the incorrect details. Make sure to take a backup of your `~/.abra/servers/<domain>` first. You can then try to re-create by using `abra server add ...` again, making sure to take care if you need to use `<user> <port>`, see `abra server add -h` for more help on this.
However, if you have Docker installed on the same machine you have `abra`, then there might be some confusion. If you run `docker context ls` you'll see that Docker uses context connection strings also. `abra` simply uses this approach. Sometimes, your Docker defined context details & your `abra` context details can get out of sync. You can use `docker context rm` to resolve this.
@ -38,48 +62,12 @@ If you need to create a new context from Docker, you can do:
docker context create <domain> --docker "host=ssh://<user>@<domain>:<port>"
```
This is what we used to before we wrote `abra` to make it more convenient.
(This is what we used to before we wrote `abra` to make it more convenient.)
## Command-line flag handling is weird?
Unfortunately, there is a limitation in our underlying command-line library implementation for `abra` ([ref](https://github.com/urfave/cli/issues/1113)) (and more fundamentally in the design of flags in the Go programming language itself ([ref](https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/programming/GoFlagUIImportance))). We're aiming to work with upstream to resolve the flag handling but this it is not yet clear when this will be resolved.
Currently, the following example of flexible flag usage is supported:
```
abra app new gitea -S # generate secrets, after args
abra app new -S gitea # generate secrets, before args
```
But something like the following does not work as expected:
```
abra app new -S gitea -p
```
Where the position of flags is mixed before & after args. `-p` is ignored :cry:
We're still waiting for upstream patch which resovles this.
## Why can't `abra` support multiline in `.env` files?
## Why can't `abra` support multiline definitions in the `.env` files?
We're sorry, it's an issue with an upstream dependency. See [`#291`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/291) for more.
## I need some feature from the old deprecated bash abra?
There is an archive of the [old code here](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra-bash).
You can install it alongside the [supported version of Abra](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra) by using these commands:
```bash
git clone https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra-bash ~/.abra/bash-src
ln -s ~/.abra/bash-src/abra ~/.local/bin/babra
```
## "Network not found" when deploying?
This appears to be an upstream issue for which we can't do much in `abra` to solve. See [`coop-cloud/organising#420`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/420) for more info. The work-around is to leave more time in between undeploy/deploy operations so the runtime can catch up.
## Caller path in debug stacktrace doesn't exist
Debug stacktrace currently begins with `/drone/` due to CI. Remove the initial `/drone/` and the path is relative to the abra project root.

View File

@ -18,87 +18,11 @@ abra upgrade --rc
## Migration guides
> General release notes are [here](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/releases/)
### `0.8.x-beta` -> `0.9.x-beta`
None at this time.
### `0.7.x-beta` -> `0.8.x-beta`
- We now have an `--offline` flag instead of relying on internal logic to try
to decide when offline/online works best. It's up to you! A lot of `abra`
operations require network access, so it is not really truly "offline". The
logic prefers local filesystem access when this flag is passed. E.g. if there
is a local copy of the catalogue, then don't `git pull`.
- There is more `--chaos`! There is more consistent flag handling for manually
overriding when to update the local recipe or leave it alone when hacking on
changes.
- Secrets are now only generated by reading the recipe config, not the env
vars. This should hopefully not affect you. If you're seeing weird behaviour,
please see [`#464`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/464).
- There is a new linting rule for catching invalid tags in recipe versions.
This is an seemingly unavoidable issue that requires some maintenance work.
If you run into the error, here's some
[docs](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/maintainers/handbook/#r014-invalid-lightweight-tag)
to help work through it.
- `~/.abra/catalogue` is now *only* updated via `git pull`. You may need to
`cd ~/.abra/catalogue && git checkout .` to get `abra` to stop complaining about
unstaged changes.
- `abra record ...` & `abra server new` have been removed! Following a usage poll, these
features were not being relied on. They were also alpha prototypes which we
feel can be reconsidered once other more critical parts of Abra are more
stable.
### `0.6.x-beta` -> `0.7.x-beta`
- **ALERTA, ALERTA**, security related issue: all `$domain.env` env vars are now exposed to the deployment via the `app` service container. Each `FOO=BAR` is exported within the context of the container. If you have any privately committed secrets in your `.env` files, please migrate them to the `secrets: ...` configuration in the recipe. This change was made to facilitate tooling which can support auto-upgrading of apps in a deployment.
- `abra` can no longer install Docker, initialise swarm mode and the proxy network. It will check if a Docker install exists and is in swarm mode or not and error out accordingly. We leave the provisioning to tools that are designed for that and reduce the command-line surface that we have to maintain going forward.
- `abra server add <host> <args>` 👉 `abra server add <host>`. We have finally removed the custom SSH handling code and now solely rely on invoking `/usr/bin/ssh` directly and reading from the `~/.ssh/config`. The `<host>` argument should correspond to a `Host <host>` entry in your `~/.ssh/config` or in an `Include <file>` statement (hosts are retrieved via `ssh -G <host>`). This means "how does `abra` interact with SSH is 1) do you have an `~/.ssh/config` entry for `<host>` 2) can you `ssh <host>` successfully? 3) there is no 3. It's an easier mental model and also the way `abra-bash` works, hence, less weird obscure errors. `<host>` being public a domain name is still required.
- `abra` no longer tries to do the TOFU host key verification prompt. We follow the praxis of the Docker CLI and just give up when host keys are not validated. We leave it to folks to SSH in and verify themselves.
- Digests have been removed from the catalogue generation. They are not being used elsewhere and were significantly slowing down generation.
### `0.5.x-beta` -> `0.6.x-beta`
- Using `{{ .Domain }}` in recipe `.envrc.sample` files went away because it
was portable enough. We revert to replacing e.g `gitea.example.com` with the
domain. See
[`8fad34e`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/commit/8fad34e) for
more.
- If your `abra.sh` scripts depend on `/bin/sh` and `/bin/bash` is available in
the container then `/bin/bash` will be used from now on. `/bin/sh` is only
now used if `/bin/bash` is not available. See
[`7f745ff`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/commit/7f745ff) for
more.
### `v0.4.x` -> `v0.5.x`
- The only breaking change was making `abra` understand that the JSON dump for the recipes listing lives on [recipes.coopcloud.tech/recipes.json](https://recipes.coopcloud.tech) instead of [recipes.coopcloud.tech](https://recipes.coopcloud.tech).
### `v0.3.x` -> `v0.4.x`
Make sure to back up your `~/.abra/servers` configurations first for safety.
- Please run `mv ~/.abra/apps ~/.abra/recipes`.
- `mv ~/.abra/apps ~/.abra/recipes`
- `find ~/.abra/servers/ -type f -exec sed -i "s/^TYPE=/RECIPE=/g" {} \;`
- "app name" as a concept went away, `abra` now uses the domain name of an app as the identifier. However, we don't expect to see breaking behaviour if you have `.env` files like `~/.abra/servers/foo.com/mycoolapp.env` and you still want to run `abra app ps mycoolapp`. `abra` still reads the filename to figure out the identifier. When running `abra app new <recipe>`, `abra` will now take the domain name as the name of the `.env` file.
- `abra` has a new SSH implementation which enforces SSH host key checking. You may run into connection issues as a result of this code churn, please see [this entry](/abra/trouble/#ssh-connection-issues) for help navigating a fix.
- CLI flag/args handling has been made more flexible. We're working within the constraints of an upstream library issue but have hopefully made it easier to mange passing flags to commands with `abra`. See [this troubleshooting entry](/abra/trouble/#command-line-flag-handling-is-weird) for the full review.
- A number of short style flags have been re-mapped and/or added. This is again related to an issue with the upstream CLI library which sometimes understands short style flags as long style flags. E.g. `--ch` instead of `-ch` for `--chaos`. As a concrete example, `--ch` is now `-C` on `abra app deploy`.
- `abra app backup` & `abra app restore` are ready for alpha-testing! See [this entry](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/maintainers/handbook/#how-do-i-configure-backuprestore) and [that entry](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/operators/handbook/#how-do-i-backuprestore-my-app) for more.
- `abra server add --traefik` went away, it was too unreliable & hard to maintain.

View File

@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
---
title: Bylaws
---
The following are the bylaws which the _Co-op Cloud: Federation_ has decided
democratically and layout our governance processes :classical_building: :fist:
## What is the Co-op Cloud Federation?
> We're still working things out, here's what know so far!
* It's membership based
* It's operates democratically
* It's about mutualising resources and sharing
* We want to do nice things together
## How many votes makes quorom for a Large Decision?
According to [Resolution 001](/federation/resolutions/passed/001), large decisions can pass when:
> more than 50% of total number of federation members :+1: votes
Please see [the membership docs](/federation/membership) to get the up-to-date membership listing and find the final count for quorom.
## How do I join the federation?
According to [Resolution 002](/federation/resolutions/passed/002):
> To join the federation an existing member must create a large decision to approve of the new member (paid or solidarity).
So, please [get in touch](/intro/contact) if you'd like to join!

View File

@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
---
title: Code of Co-operation
---
> Huge thanks to the folks at [Varia](https://varia.zone/) &
> [LURK](https://lurk.org) who carefully prepared wonderful Code of Conduct
> documents which we have adapted for our needs (with permission). See the
> original documents [here](https://varia.zone/en/pages/code-of-conduct.html)
> and [there](https://lurk.org/TOS.txt).
Co-op Cloud is used by several communities coming from a variety of cultural,
ethnic and professional backgrounds. We strive for to be welcoming to people of
these various backgrounds and provide a non-toxic and harassment-free
environment.
The Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines that help establish shared values
and ensure that behaviour that may harm participants is avoided.
We acknowledge that we come from different backgrounds and all have certain
biases and privileges. Therefore, this Code of Conduct cannot account for all
the ways that people might feel excluded, unsafe or uncomfortable. We commit to
open dialogues, and as such this Code of Conduct is never finished and should
change whenever needed. We amend this document over time so it reflects the
priorities and sensitivities of the community as it changes.
It is a collective responsibility for all of us to enact the behaviour
described in this document.
## Expected behaviour
We expect each other to:
### Be considerate...
...of each other, the space we enter, the Co-op Cloud community and the
practices that it houses.
### Be open and generous...
...while trying not to make assumptions about others. This can include
assumptions about identity, knowledge, experiences or preferred pronouns. Be
generous with our time and our abilities, when we are able to. Help others, but
ask first. There are many ways to contribute to a collective practice, which
may differ from our individual ways.
### Be respectful...
...of different viewpoints and experiences. Respect physical and emotional
boundaries. Be respectful of each others' limited time and energy. Take each
other and each other's practices seriously. Acknowledge that this might lead to
disagreement. However, disagreement is no excuse for poor manners.
### Be responsible....
...for the promises we make, meaning that we follow up on our commitments. We
take responsibility for the good things we do, but also for the bad ones. We
listen to and act upon respectful feedback. We correct ourselves when
necessary, keeping in mind that the impact of our words and actions on other
people doesn't always match our intent.
### Be dedicated...
...which means not letting the group happen to us, but making the group
together. We participate in the group with self-respect and don't exhaust
ourselves. This might mean saying how we feel, setting boundaries, being clear
about our expectations. Nobody is expected to be perfect in this community.
Asking questions early avoids problems later. Those who are asked should be
responsive and helpful.
### Be empathetic...
..by actively listening to others and not dominating discussions. We give each
other the chance to improve and let each other step up into positions of
responsibility. We make room for others. We are aware of each other's feelings,
provide support where necessary, and know when to step back. One's idea of
caring may differ from how others want to be cared for. We ask to make sure
that our actions are wanted.
### Foster an inclusive environment...
...by trying to create opportunities for others to express views, share skills
and make other contributions. Being together is something we actively work on
and requires negotiation. We recognize that not everyone has the same
opportunities, therefore we must be sensitive to the context we operate in.
There are implicit hierarchies that we can challenge, and we should strive to
do so. When we organize something (projects, events, etc.), we think about how
we can consider degrees of privilege, account for the needs of others, promote
an activist stance and support other voices.
## Unacceptable behaviour
### No structural or personal discrimination
Attitudes or comments promoting or reinforcing the oppression of any groups or
people based on gender, gender identity and expression, race, ethnicity,
nationality, sexuality, sexual orientation, religion, disability, mental
illness, neurodiversity, personal appearance, physical appearance, body size,
age, or class. Do not claim “reverse-isms”, for example “reverse racism”.
### No harrassment
Neither public nor private. Also no deliberate intimidation, stalking,
following, harassing photography or recording, disruption of events,
aggressive, slanderous, derogatory, or threatening comments online or in person
and unwanted physical or electronic contact or sexual attention. No posting or
disseminating libel, slander, or other disinformation.
### No violation of privacy
Namely publishing others private information, such as a physical or electronic
address, without explicit permission. Do not take or publish photos or
recordings of others after their request to not do so. Delete recordings if
asked.
### No unwelcome sexual conduct
Including unwanted sexual language, imagery, actions, attention or advances.
### No destructive behaviour
Or any other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate. This
includes (but is not exclusive to) depictions of violence without content
warnings, consistently and purposely derailing or disrupting conversations, or
other behaviour that persistently disrupts the ability of others to engage in
the group or space.
## Intervention procedure
**Immediate intervention (help is needed now!)**
If you are feeling unsafe, you can immediately contact the Co-op Cloud members
who are tasked with making sure the code of co-operation is respected.
These contact people are members of Co-op Cloud who will do their best to help,
or to find the correct assistance if relevant/necessary. Here is the list so
far. If you would like to help in this task, please also feel free to volunteer
to be a support member.
> handle: `sordidwhiskey` contact:
> [helo@coopcloud.tech](mailto:helo@coopcloud.tech) handle: `3wc` contact:
> [helo@coopcloud.tech](mailto:helo@coopcloud.tech)
For example, something happened during a still-ongoing online event and needs
to be acted upon right away. Action is taken immediately when this violation of
the code of co-operation is reported. This could involve removing an attendee
from said event.
## Non-immediate intervention (a situation that requires more time)
Other violations need to be considered and consulted upon with more people or
in a more measured way. For example: If you experience an ongoing pattern of
harrassment; if you witness structurally unacceptable behaviour; if somebody
keeps "accidentally" using discriminatory language, after being asked to stop.
If you feel comfortable or able, discuss the issues with the involved parties
before consulting a mediator. We prefer to constructively resolve disagreements
together and work to right the wrong, when it is possible and safe to do so.
However, if the problems still persist, those who are responsible for enforcing
the code of co-operation can help you deal with these kinds of problems.
Contact the members listed above. Information will be handled with sensitivity.

View File

@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
---
title: Finance
---
> If you have any questions or run into problems, please chat with us on
> `#coopcloud-finance:autonomic.zone`
## Agreeing to spend money (Budgets)
## Sending and receiving money
It's slightly complicated, because money is complicated, but here's how it works. There are two moving parts:
* The Co-op Cloud Open Collective
* The Autonomic Wise account
Autonomic is [the fiscal host](https://docs.opencollective.com/help/fiscal-hosts/fiscal-hosts) for the Co-op Cloud Open Collective (OC).
OC helps us make all expenses and transfers transparent to the Federation. No actual money is handled via the OC interface. All payments are done via the Autonomic [Wise](https://wise.com) account. The total sum of the available funds shows on the OC page is the actual amount that is held in the Autonomic Wise account.
Autonomic Co-op members commit to support the federation by doing the financial adminstration work for the time being. Autonomic is publicy registered, has a bank account, files taxes etc. All financial comings/goings are kept on the books internally at Autonomic. This could be further mutualised or another collective could pick this up in the future.
Autonomic does not eat the transfer costs from the Wise account when paying out expense for members. That is charged to the Federation common fund.
### How to get paid via Open Collective
* [Create an account on Open Collective](https://opencollective.com/create-account)
* Go to the [Co-op Cloud Open Collective](https://opencollective.com/coop-cloud)
* Click [SUBMIT EXPENSE](https://opencollective.com/coop-cloud/expenses/new)
**Important** Please include bank details in your expense so that we can make a bank transfer. We do not currently support payments via Paypal and other platforms.
If you urgently need the money, please let us know on the Co-op Cloud Finance channel.
Finally, please let us know what your username/email is for your Open Collective account so we can add you to the team. This helps us build up the view of our community from the perspective of our Open Collective page.
### How to pay someone via Wise
> **Note**: only Autonomic Co-op members can do this
* First off, be wary of two things: 1) the currency conversion 2) the transaction fees of Wise. For 1) we have the complicating factor that the OC represents the common fund in GBP but our internal Wise jar is EUR. Then you're getting deeper into trouble if someone wants to get paid in e.g. USD.
* In order to cover the transaction fee, you need to fake do the transfer to see what you'll be charged and then add that to what you withdraw from the jar. This is because Autonomic does not eat the cost of the transfer from Wise, that is charged to the Federation.
* First step is to withdraw cash from the Co-op Cloud jar. It will automatically be transferred to the general EUR jar because the Co-op Cloud jar is also in EUR.
* To transfer to USD, you don't have to use USD, you can use GBP/EUR directly. It's easier to make the direct payment from the jar you transferred it to. This is purely because it is easier to follow it in the accounting bookkeeping later on.
* When making the payment, do the following:
* Select international transfer, choose your requird `$currency`
* Put correct amount in "recipient gets exactly" to get Wise to figure out the correct amount
* Open the invoice in Open Collective and look for the expense number, e.g. "Expense #132373" and put this in the reference number of the payment
* Note how long the transfer will take (Wise should tell you)
* Mark the expense as paid in Open Collective. Use the "manual" method.
* Let the member know the payment is on the way and how long it will take (if you have time).
#### FAQ
##### Where are the bank details of federation members?
Please see [`Finance.md` in the internal Federation Wiki](https://git.coopcloud.tech/Federation/organising/wiki/Finance)
##### What transfer type do we use for USD?
`ACH`. If you see `Abartn`, that is the `ACH routing number`.
### Tiers on Open Collective
* Infrastructure Sustainability: Folks who are making use of Co-op Cloud digital infrastructure (e.g. [git.coopcloud.tech](https://git.coopcloud.tech)) and want to help out with maintenance costs. All recurring donations are spent directly on running costs and system adminstration labour. Thanks for considering!
* Federation Membership: Dues paid by members of the Co-op Cloud Federation. Please see "Resolution 002: Membership/Dues 2023-03-22" for more information. There may be further decisions made around dues, please refer to the Federation documentation on [docs.coopcloud.tech/federation](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation).

View File

@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
---
title: Federation
---
Welcome to the Co-op Cloud Federation documentation!
This is the public facing page where we publish all things federation in the open.
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- __Resolutions__
Our drafts, in-progress and passed resolutions ✊
[Read More](/federation/resolutions){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Finance__
Learn about how we deal with money and how to get paid 💸
[Read More](/federation/finance){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Membership__
See who's already joined us 🥰
[Our Members](/federation/membership){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Minutes__
All minutes from our meetings 📒
[Past Meetings](/federation/minutes){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Digital Tools__
Tools we use to organise online 🔌
[Tools We Use](/federation/tools){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Code of Co-operation__
Be excellent to each other 💝
[Read More](/federation/code-of-coop){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
</div>

View File

@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
---
title: Membership
---
> Are you also interested in joining the federation? Please see [Resolution 002](/federation/resolutions/passed/002/) for our process on how to join. If you have any questions, [drop us a line](/intro/contact/) with us for a chat
| Name | Dues Paid | Notes | Contact |
| --------- | --------- | -------- |-------- |
| Agaric | - | - | `@wolcen:matrix.org` |
| [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone) | - | - | `@3wc`, `@cas`, `@knoflook`, `@travvy`, `@aadil` |
| [Bonfire](https://bonfirenetworks.org) | - | - | `@mayel:matrix.org` + Ivan (`@cambriale:matrix.org`) |
| [Doop.coop](https://doop.coop) | - | - | `@yusf:gottsnack.net` |
| [EOTL](https://eotl.supply) | - | - | `@basebuilder:pub.solar` |
| [Karrot](https://karrot.world) | - | - | `@nicksellen:matrix.org` |
| [Klasse & Methode](https://codeberg.org/Klasse-Methode) | - | - | `@p4u1_f4u1:matrix.org` |
| [Local IT](https://local-it.org/) | - | - | Philipp (`@yksflip:matrix.kaputt.cloud`) + `@moritz:matrix.local-it.org` |
| Mirsal ™ | - | - | `@mirsal:1312.media` |
| [UTAW](https://utaw.tech) | - | - | `@javielico:matrix.org` |
| [BeWater](https://bewater.contact) | Waiver | - | `@decentral1se` |
| [ruangrupa](https://ruangrupa.id) | - | - | Henry `@babystepper:matrix.org` |

View File

@ -1,319 +0,0 @@
---
title: 2022-03-03
---
## Co-op Cloud Federation Bootstrapping
_Please add any suggested agenda items here. We'll add meeting notes to this page after the meeting has happened_
## Metadata
* Time / date: March 3 @ 1500-1630 UTC https://time.is/0300PM_3_Mar_2023_in_UTC
* Location: https://meet.jit.si/coop-cloud-federation-bootstrap-meeting
* Real-time note taking will happen at: https://pad.autonomic.zone/XVhRKvAaRHmaEIR14KBxLA# (and be migrated here after the meeting)
## Agenda
(All times UTC, as sharp as possible)
| Start | End | Topic | Time |
| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
| 1500 | - | Meeting opens | - |
| 1500 | 1510 | introductions | 10m |
| 1510 | 1520 | confirming the agenda | 10m |
| 1520 | 1540 | decision-making process | 20m |
| 1540 | 1450 | break | 10m |
| 1450 | 1610 | small-group discussions | 20m |
| 1610 | 1630 | report-back / next steps | 20m |
Suggested topics for small-group discussions:
1. What software tools do we want to use for our organising?
2. How should the finances of the federation work?
3. Where else can we promote Co-op Cloud?
4. Development priorities
## Meeting notes
### Agenda
(All times UTC, as sharp as possible)
| Start | End | Topic | Time |
| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
| 1500 | - | Meeting opens | - |
| 1500 | 1510 | introductions | 10m |
| 1510 | 1520 | confirming the agenda | 10m |
| 1520 | 1540 | decision-making process | 20m |
| 1540 | 1450 | break | 10m |
| 1450 | 1610 | small-group discussions | 20m |
| 1610 | 1630 | report-back / next steps | 20m |
Suggested topics for small-group discussions:
1. What software tools do we want to use for our organising?
2. How should the finances of the federation work?
3. Where else can we promote Co-op Cloud?
4. Development priorities
### Introductions
- name
- pronouns
- co-op you're part of
- favorite natural place
Attending:
* Trav (Autonomic) [facilitation]
* dc1 (Autonomic)
* Phillip (Local-IT)
* kawaiipunk (Autonomic)
* V (Flancia [coop] - https://anagora.org [software platform])
* Cas (Autonomic) [main notes]
* Josef (Doop-Coop)
* Wolcen (Agaric)
* Ivan (Bonfire)
* Mayel (Bonfire)
* Calix (Autonomic) [facilitation]
* Jamie (FarmOS)
* Mirsal
### Confirming Agenda
- V: Question about overall objective.
- Calix: Any suggested answers?
- dc1: To see who wants to come with on setting up the fed. Getting going making descisions together. Also how people see themselves participating on an ongoing basis.
- Calix: Any other intentions?
[Mirsal joins]
Recap:
- How to make Decisions
- Wolcen: Is there an existing org or is this the start?
- Trav: This is the kick off. We start here.
- dc1: Points to proposal. Mostly from Autonomic's viewpoint, which we hope to build on.
- V: Asking about transcription bots.
- Calix: Suggests that we table for now for later discussion.
### decision-making process
proposal: https://git.coopcloud.tech/Federation/Federation/wiki/Proposals
- Trav: We adapted an old proposal for descision making process.
- https://pad.autonomic.zone/s/MLafJE2jC#Overview
- https://coopcloud.tech/blog/federation-proposal/
- Trav: We consider this an important step in group formation. Summary: Proposal is written up and posted on channel, voting occurs via emoji reactions and after a time period it is passed.
- dc1: Context: Autonomic has been initiating the project heretofor and has made all descisions, but we want the community to have that power rather than Autonomic.
- Calix: We are in bootstraps as far as descision making so we have hope we can do it ad hoc this time.
- V: Question about using Loomio.
- kawaiipunk: Loomio while it is good seems to have a lot of bloat to it and the complexity of the forum functionality. Proposes we try to the most minimal mechanics possible. Autonomic uses this process.
Calix: We don't have SSO for Coopcloud that we all have access. Gitea is a good platform for bootstrapping since it has its own accounts and almost everyone already has accounts on it for functional reasons.
Wolcen: keeping things in as few places as possible seems better.
- dc1: +1 for minimal. We are at the start, and all things are vague so we perhaps just do the minimal possible and keep going with what we have
- V: As a member of not autonomic lacking context. tnx to dc1 for clarifying.
- Wolcen: Asks about technology for automating the gitea+wiki->matrix crossover.
- dc1: No automation current we can always change that later
- kawaiipunk: Would the voting proposal come into effect after this meeting. Propose that it should. - Explanation that we operate more on a consent basis than exactly a consensus and this proposal continues that.
- Wolcen: Asks about how to determine the magnitude of a descision and when the proposal can be acted on based on votes.
- dc1: General descions are made as more than one person. This informs how to do the calculation for the magnitude.
- kawaiipunk: Medium descisions can pass without everyone interacting with them. Good descisions are transparent and reversable. Controversial things generally have more than one blocker.
### break time
### Roundup about breakouts
### Checking on qualified yes answers on poll about descision making
1 qualified yes. Giving space for the qualifications. No takers.
- V: Suggests that Autonomic lead that choice.
- kawaiipunk: Agrees. If we're following consensus, unless anyone blocks it passes.
**We pass the descision making process.**
### Breakouts
* Calix: Suggestions for other breakout topics?
* Wolcen: 1 & 4 seem closely tied and should be merged.
* dc1: Membership should be a topic.
* We vote on poll now.
#### Breakout 1 + 3 (technology and technology)
> (See notes below)
We summarized where we're at, what technologies are being used for organizing, what are the dependencies for coop cloud, and what is being developed.
A couple of little things that are interesting from the perspective of development priorities:
- debug / entrypoint tools
- catalog normalization
#### Breakout 2 (finances)
> (See notes below)
Summary: Federation model has tried and failed several times. Priority should be getting some money in. Give what you can should be the main thing and we can see if we need to tweak that.
#### Breakout 4 (membership)
> (See notes below)
Broke down what membership means. Three classes of membership and what their powers are.
- Community member (individual level)
- Recipe maintainer
- Federation members - which is the main descion making member.
Discussed the processes involved in creating members, as in notes.
MVP is protection from capital interest. Existing members vote on new members? Minimal and lean.
### We vote on next meeting time
### Checkout process
> How do you feel? What about future?
* Calix: Feeling inspired. Topics would love to talk about: Working groups? What comms channels are needed?
* V: Feeling amazing. In one month?
* dc1: Feeling great, very productive. Looking forward to future.
* Trav: Great! THink this works well. Good that we can actually make descisions. Excited and optimistic for future.
* Mayel: Feel good about meeting. Really good to see energies. Great awesome keep going.
* Wolcen: Feels great. Good to see it making progress. Missed meeting pad - having official links for future meetings would be nice to have.
* Cas: Great. Looking forward to nitty gritty stuff.
* kawaiipunk: Tired, but good. Good discussions. Excited to have it open up to other people. Maybe we could hack on technical stuff. Interested in recipes and doing more formal organization.
* Phillipp: Excited this was really great. Language barrier made it a little challenging. Next meeting has a lot of questions and things to do.
### Poll
* 1 month wins for next meeting.
### Breakout room minutes
#### Breakout room #1
We have a rambling discussion about things related to software.
List of technologies currently in use:
- gitea [wiki, source repo, kanban?]
- matrix [chat, community organization]
Technologies under development/coop cloud
- Abra
- Recipes
- Recipe catalog
Technology dependencies
- Docker + swarm
Technology decision considerations
- What about using other 'containers', 'virtual instances', etc?
- Part of the value proposition is that it operates on current standards.
Development priorities
- Standardizing recipe catalog acquisition
- Debug/other hooks/entrypoints
#### Breakout room #2
Breakout Room #2: How should the finances of the federation work?
* Present: Trav, Mayel, yksflip, d1, V
* trav taking notes
* d1: want to map what we're already doing. At first unpaid then back-paid. Grant money is gone. Now asking clients to contribute 50% of fee towards Co-op Cloud development. Have not dumped money into OC yet.
* V: why tell clients? Transparency?
* d1: yeah transparency, helps get paid out and helps groups understand what they're contributing to.
* m: some part of revenue goes back to maintain commons. we know theres more than the config, we have admin, meetings, more services/tools/etc. besides membership dues, I would draft some suggestions/templates for how hosters can split revenue between infra/config/upstream project development...
* yksflip: contribute time to co-op cloud atm. but happy to shuffle money directly to open collective. main funding is public funding, funders need to see who is working on what, transparency/overview stuff. they also have money to give to freelancers. could we have ways to say we give % of the project to the open collective of the fedi. still trying to make local-it sustainable. funding until july and then open question how to go on sustainably.
* t: concern on finances is, having enough. paying for meetings is noble but we'll lose money fast. having a prioritisation of where money goes would be great. then as we have cash we put it where we want.
* d1: contribute comensurate to number of members in co-op? what would be a practical model? do we attach it to membership (dues?).
* v: dues and per-x contribution? are these two differen things?
* d1: 2 approaches, end goal is the same, have members contribute to the project
* V: we are amalgum, hard to quantify member #s
* yksflip: best to start with something easy. Co-ops of this size/# of instance, guidelines. Try it and then discuss again in a few months. Compensating meetings is great but maybe some things are more urgent.
* V: how does Autonomic do this currently?
* d1: simpler for us as 1 org vs fed. All funds into 1 pot. Tricky to get right. Did call with Co-op Cycle, bike delivery. Start with financial contribution from the start. Money makes things happen.
#### Breakout #3 did not happen
#### Breakout #4: Membership
* Jamie (facilitating)
* Kawaiipunk
* Calix (notes)
What are we hoping to learn / decide?
* kp: 3 levels of membership:
* community member
* maintainers of recipes
* federation members
* question: boundaries around co-operativeness. open to organisations / individuals? what org. structures permitted for members. co-ops only? worker co-ops only? allied orgs? capitalist orgs? do we allow co-ops
* calix: Q: what is the process for deciding any of above questions? new members, dues, etc.
* j: is there a way for e.g. corporate members to be community members? any previous steps towards decision-making with co-op cloud?
* Calix: Cooperative Technologists [...] when someone wants to joing it's a network-wide process, case-by-case, open to anyone to in the group; then w/ Autonomic, it's a 2-step process where someone joins provisionally, then as full member after a period of time.
* j: B-Corp, somewhat controversial category at this point as to whether it means anything or not. Consideration to take network approach to avoid "legalistic" approach, strict "by the books".
* kp: might also be a problem of assessing what counts as a cooperative for international members, different legal formations around the world.
* c: Proposal: the 3 cats, fed-members should be cooperatively run, and aligned with values of the federation. Large decision among federation members to add a new one.
* J: Like it. Open it as a question.
* c: Could use our new decision making process? Ask for comments before it goes live.
* kp: Seems quite fundamental. Best to keep simple and iterate.
* calix: should there be a federation members only matrix channel to discuss federation decisions?
* kp: guess there'd have to be under current plans. or does it set up too much of an "in group"? proposals could be posted publicly, voting could be in secret, results public? emoji voting in a private channel. transparency = positive.
* jamie: public "who voted how"
* kp: maybe literally just collecting of voting

View File

@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
---
title: 2023-05-03
---
# Co-op Cloud Federation Meeting 2023-05-03
Notes from last meeting: https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/minutes/2022-03-03/
Metadata
* Time / date: May 3 @ 1500-1630 UTC https://time.is/0330PM_3_May_2023_in_UTC
* Location: https://meet.jit.si/coop-cloud-federation-meeting
* Attending: Autonomic (trav, 3wc), Local-IT (yksflip, Moritz), decentral1se (🐺 /free agent)
* Facilitation: Calix
* Notes: trav
Agenda
_(All times UTC, as sharp as possible)_
* Introductions / checkins (5m)
* How you're doing
* Which organisation are you attached to? (if applicable)
* a fun (or terrible) Co-op Cloud experience you've had recently
* Packaging Rustdesk server 🥳
* Realising backupbot labels didn't work 😱
* Upgrading with missing backups 😅 Deployed 18-20 apps at once, wrote a script 🤯
* Immovable force meets unstoppable bug, no deployments ⛔
* Decisions - what passed, any new proposals? (10m) https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/
* we review the existing resolutions
* Resolution 005 / process
* trav: sticking to 2 week deadline for proposals?
* d1: there was a meeting where we talked about it being a small decision but then it became medium. G
* trav: ahh mixups happen, I don't feel strongly ultimately.
* yksflip: maybe check-in with cas but call it passed (?). 2 weeks is a good amount of time but can understand you'd want to move on more quickly.
* 3wc: 2 week default good. Very async coordination, espeically if folks have to go back to their co-op to check-in. Fewer people will see it the shorter it is.
* Moritz: how to know size of the decision?
* 3wc: smallest decision size that seems fair.
* d1 in chat: 'who is affected by the decision'
* d1: 2 weeks seems good, simpler to stick to that going forward. Super duper emergency budget
* What does the second point of Resolution 004 mean
* 3wc: first Budget is a budget for these meetings.
* Superduperemergencybudget
* Trav: For emergency work?
* d1: yes, but the part that's missing is to know what is super duper emergency. There are a lot of P1 bugs but they're not all show-stoppers. There are a number of things that need to be fixed quicker than 2 weeks
* 3wc: emergency firefighter. Up to whoever proposes the budget as to what the structure would look like.
* abra fixes Budget / proposal thingy
* https://pad.autonomic.zone/Fp6Zi846TNqATulYFqcJqw
* d1: if this was proposed today, wait 2 weeks and then I'd fix them. Or standing budget?
* trav: suggestion is wait 2 weeks then implement? or agree standing budget?
* 3wc: yes, but also passing emergency budget would also take 2 weeks, no?
* d1: propose this and do 10 hours or do a "10 hours" proposal and fit this into it. Not show-stopping bugs but 2 weeks wont kill us.
* trav: might be worth passing 10h/mo, something/month for fixes, maintenance / emergency. non-binding poll / gitea voting → what to work on. vs having to package bug work together. less bureaucracy.
* d1: can re-work decision 6 into a maintenance budget. Curious how we want to bubble-up the bugs. Board? Label?
* yksflip: standing maintenance makes sense to me.
* federation bootstrap funds 🤑
* trav: there's money leftover from donor
* d1: 6k in the pot, get the work funded.
* trav: buffer tho?
* Moritz: I'm paid from Local IT. How to decide who is doing which fixes?
* d1: people tend to do stuff they want to see done. Some way to share would be good....?
* 3wc: tags. Tickets labeled as part of maintenance budget. If assigned to someone, they are point person. Plot twist: time expectation. Someone takes something on and it's unclear when that's going to happen. Claim things for up to a week or 2 but don't claim it until you're ready to work on it.
* ** we love it **
* **d1 to roll into maintenance proposal**
* doop coop dues waiver https://pad.autonomic.zone/xgd7lLxzT520O4KRXuWyuQ#
* 3wc: yusef posted, side project, low income, would like to participate. 1 year waiver of dues. They seem enthusiastic and helpful person to be around.
* trav: can decide now? " Individuals/groups wanting to join Co-op Cloud who arent able to make a financial contribution may request a solidarity free membership." doesn't say how to make decision
* d1: medium seems fine
* Moritz: instead of dues perhaps doing some abra fixes
* Philip: agree on waiving fees for them. How to define time to spend on project. Alternative membership fee, donate time?
* 3wc: part of inspiration for fedration is Co-op Cycle: too complicated to track work and money. Have to track money so wont track work. Like the simplicity. Wage is €20/h, in-kind work contribution would be 30 minutes of work contribution per month.
* d1: reflecting on unions etc, pay dues and also contribute. Something to think about.
* Checkouts
didn't get to:
* Breakout groups?
* Software tools
* Finances
* Outreach
* Development
* next meeting? Is it monthly? I forget.

View File

@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
---
title: 2024-02-01
---
# Co-op Cloud Federation meeting 2024-02
Date poll: https://crab.fit/coop-cloud-federation-february-2024-576238
Previous notes: https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/minutes/2023-05-03/
## Agenda
- check-in
- name
- pronouns
- organisation
- how we're feeling
- anything we want to get out of today
- emotional support for abra bugs
- missed october 2023 membership dues review ([R002](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/002/)), what now?
- [backup restore / testing update](https://pad.riseup.net/p/UEC2JUPGb6tmRCZ7RX9X-keep)
- collective abra next release planning
- ✅ bonfire co-op network hosting proposal
- ✅ next meeting
- check-out
- how was the meeting?
- recommendations for next meeting
- what are you doing for the rest of the day?
## Notes
Here: Calix, Mayel, Moritz, p4u1, d1
Facilitating: Calix
Notes: Mayel
- local-it has test framework with Playwright to test deployment, eg. testing customised configs or modified recipes - not testing app functionality but rather customisation or integrations between apps, eg. SSO - so can check if an upgrade would break - would be nice to integrate the tests into the recipes to they can be linked to the version (ie. update recipe when updating a recipe/app) - in future want to automate into CI (eg drone runner) to auto-update recipes and check for failure - will publish test framework next week on coopcloud gitea - run them first on test deployments to check in advance if update works but also then run in prod to make sure thing runs correctly in prod (eg. if email notifs are working in each app) - this does require extra thinking (eg. deleting data created by tests)
- sounds really cool! going to look into playwright. could be handy for federated apps
- sounds like something that orgs like nlnet may fund, maybe can merge these into a proposal to fund this + the more boring coopcloud maintainance
## organise meeting schedule
- would be nice to find a regular rythm for federation meetings instead of needing date polls
- same time? once a month?
- in social.coop TWG they've been getting 2-3 people showing up, maybe just because haven't polled for new regular meeting time for a while
- need someone with capacity to organise (coordination role), whether it's setting up poll or prompting people to join, to get us all in the room
- will someone set up a date poll for march? or re. meeting frequency / how we decide -> Moritz volunteered
### bonfire co-op network hosting proposal
- https://bonfirenetworks.org/hosting/
what co-op cloud combined with servers.coop would do. idea comes from a need from bonfire team, people who are looking to adopt bonfire, individuals, small collectives, large organisations who might not have tech savvy to set up and maintain own hosting / instances, would rather have as a service .. but we decided early on we didn't want to offer hosting ourselves. and we don't want to host any flagship instances (because centralisation). calls for easy way for people to set up and maintain instances. not just infrastructure, labour, savvy, mnaintenance and support, backups. like community-supported agriculture, "community-supported software" = community gets a say in software, have a say in prioritising. large part of funds goes into infra and labour of maintaining / operating. split among participants.
last funding from NLNet, included milestone. prototype instance setup wizard and management dashboard. €3k to start. small tech component, organisational and infra.
what would m like from CC at this stage?
participants help with prototyping
start small - organisational & infrastructural side is
communities already want instances!
not setup wizard required, just send us an email etc. do it by hand
budget avail now
one group focused on open science, one on digital radios, online communities around music. possibilities of them finding grants, other sources of income. donations from community members? assume = there would be funds eventually. might have to be a bit of upfront freebie service, especially as we're prototyping. closed beta as we're trying things out.
### missed october 2023 membership dues
- we were going to review who's paying, how's the amount. we didn't! what to do.
### backup restore / testing update
- after meeting about backup bot in januarry, need to document what already exists and what has been decided, there was a proposal - will followup async
### collective abra next release planning
- some are in process of improving backup/restore (still WIP) and some bugs were also found, so now it's difficult to make a release - many are self-building abra so not an issue for them, but would be good to make a plan first (next time) to avoid large refactors that block releases
- also plan around how long features take to implement, maybe during federation meetings
- proposal for next abra release: some bugs are fixed in main branch but release blocked by backup stuff, so could create a new branch from point where backup stuff was not merged and create release from there, so don't need to worry about incomplete backup stuff, should be pretty easy, that way can finish backup with no rush
- if we do so, need 1 or 2 people to run integration tests + fix any bugs that appear and then do the release - ideally 1 person who has released before (d1 volunteers) + another who hasn't (p4u1 volunteers)
## check out
- in future need to talk about how long meeting can go before starting + agenda prioritisation

View File

@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
---
title: 2024-03-29
---
## Meta
* Time: 29-03-2024
* Present: d1, p4u1, mo
* Call: https://vc.autistici.org/CoopCloudFederationMeeting
## Agenda
- checking in
- abra release planning https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/583
- reforms to fedi process
- symptoms
- eotl vote delayed weeks
- many members not paying dues, no waiver agreed
- vera / Flancia left all chats?
- proposals
- [define fedi member reponsibilities](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/579)
- exit criteria for fedi members
- delay x quorom decision making
- rolling "credit system" for doing work
## Notes
### Checking in
d1: last release was gnarly, was tired but now looking forward to coordinating new release
mo: travelling, pretty busy, alakazam presentation/docs/feedback energies
p4: release hell, good progress, happy to see automation for new release. backupbot spec is underway, to discuss soon...
### Release planning
Note about previous release: goreleaser refused to to release on a branch previously, so we reverted the backup changes and reverted the revert after the release
#### Catalogue
why catalogue?
- advantage: git repository
- disadvantage: overhead, CI/CD system, people don't understand it, several bugs
proposal: rely on tags in the repository. clone everything to .abra/recipes/... pull tags locally on-the-fly.
if i create a new version of a recipe, the catalogue is not even at all. it just looks locally. the update happens afterwards
precomputing means saving resources later on
With the operator collaboration topic, it will be possible to specificy an app recipe with a git location, it is then possible to skip the catalogue.
https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/533#issuecomment-19038
recipes.coopcloud.tech (the Elm app) is reading the JSON
in an ideal post-catalogue abra, you could just ref a git org where `RECIPE=<recipe>` would find `https://git.example.com/<org>/<recipe>` and even `RECIPE=<org>/<recipe>`
Backwards compatiblibility will be key. For next next release 🎉
#### Automation test suite
Computing power from somewhere? Local-IT doing migration atm so not ideal timing. Maybe again after a month or so, can check-in again then.
Can also ask Autonomic and/or whoever else feels like they can help.
#### Cli Argument Handling
https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/581
Upgrade to `urfave/cli` version 2 will enforce `abra app command command [command options] <domain> [<service>] <command> [-- <args>]`
Maybe we need a poll to see how people are using it? `@mo` using the strict format anyway, `@d1` not minding, `@p4` in favour...
adding a good/clear warning/error that if using e.g. `--chaos` on the end, it's not possible anymore...
> How do you use flag options (e.g. `--chaos`) with Abra?
> At the beginning: abra app deploy --chaos app.example.com
> At the end: abra app deploy app.example.com --chaos
> How annoyed will you be if, we enforce it at the beginning?
> Not annoyed
> Slighty annoyed
> Very annoyed
> If you are *annoyed, what can we do to help this process? e.g. docs, warning, etc.
Decision vs. poll? It's not really a choice. the lib is broken / enforces this. its ambigous now and just causes issues / questions / confusion.
Hack to re-order options transparently? Some pre-processor which would special case the `[-- ARGS]` for `abra app cmd`.
Doing it one way is just clear for everyone.
Plan: make proposal, get votes. if voted against, try to make new with adaptions / more work/money etc. but compromises with needs. (TODO: `@d1`)
Btw emoji polls are actually broken for some clients 😱
### Fedi process reforms
https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/579
- pay yearly dues or get waiver (don't pay)
- actively participate in voting
- actively participate in monthly federation meetings. if you can't make it, please send your updates by text
- agree to code of conduct
exit criteria?
- no yearly dues arragement
- no/less voting/participation in meetings
TODO: proposal, pass, check in with people in the "exit criteria" area, are they OK?
### Goals of Federation?
- what is the purpose of the fedi?
- in relation to theory, ideology, strategy
- Co-op Cloud Conf !!!
- let's think about this and check back in
### Next meeting
`@mo` does next poll

View File

@ -1,73 +0,0 @@
---
title: 2024-04-17
---
## Meta
* Poll: https://poll.local-it.org/invite/Q828kjlYLNwW
* Call: https://talk.local-it.org/rooms/nyy-z5y-yrh-sc2/join
* Present: Local IT (moritz), EOTL (BaseBuilder, blu), BeWater(d1), Autonomic (Lai), Klasse & Methode (p4u1)
## Agenda
### First
* Fixed monthly Federation meeting (3rd Mon, etc) `@basebuilder`
* Project re-organisation (recipes, tools, fedi repos) `@d1`
* Backup specification `@p4u1`
### The Rest
* Non-Federation tasks specific bounty / funding `@basebuilder`
* Website and docs work to better showcase federation - `@kawaiipunk`
* https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/milestone/43
* Recipe maintainence proposal - `@kawaiipunk`
* "Hacking velocity = slow & money" (RE: recent fedi orga chat) `@d1`
* Continuing budget 001 for meeting attendance, resolution 004 technically only covered 6 months to oct 2023 `@3wc` (but I won't be there)
## Notes
### Fixed monthly Federation meeting (3rd Mon, etc)
Talked about it couple of times, back and forth.
- People who want to do regular can do that
- Other people can do polled meeting
- Poll every month is time consuming
- Timezones is an issue
Poll options for meeting
1. fix time/date every month
1. fixed time/date with timezone wraparound (can be merged with 1. :)
1. flexible every month (poll)
1. fixed week with poll (day of week, crab.fit)
> crab.fit - software with heatmap of availability
### Project re-organisation (recipes, tools, fedi repos)
Problem: All projects are under one organisation (coop-cloud). Abra has to do a lot of work to figure out what is a recipe repo and what not. This got fixed but made recipe generation really slow
Proposal: 3 Organisations in gitea:
- Recipes
- Tools
- Projects
What to look out for:
- Redirects (mainly for recipes)
- SSH will break though -> could make a migration script for that?
https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/milestone/45
https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/569
Maybe "tools" / "projects" not needed, only "recipes" / "other".
### Backup Specification
Needing to write operators and matainers guide
- [ ] should abra implement backup and restore or only provide an integration?
- [ ] should we add a specification version?
## Next Meeting
* Who: ???

View File

@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
---
title: Minutes
---

View File

@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 013"
---
!!! note
This resolution has been amended! The main change was to remove automatic
git synchronisation; please see [the file
history](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/docs.coopcloud.tech/commits/branch/main/docs/federation/resolutions/in-progress/013.md) for a full run-down.
- Budget 007: Operator sync
- Date: 2024-01-??
- Deadline: 2024-01-XX
- Size: Large
### Summary
As highlighted in several tickets (e.g. [`#434`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/434), [`#467`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/467)), several operators working together on the same server routinely run into deployment instability. This is due to the fact that we do not store the deployment version of the apps.
With this proposal, we would like to address the synchronisation of app deployment versions. This is being called "Operator sync". What follows is the design proposal which has already received feedback from operators on [this pad](https://pad.riseup.net/p/IebZQkpe3OOpYyVT8f1j-keep).
### Details (Budget 007)
We add support a config file (`$ABRA_DIR/config.yml`) which has these defaults:
We also add a `abra config` command which has the following shape:
```
🌻 ./abra config -h
NAME:
abra config - Manage system-wide Abra configuration
USAGE:
abra config command [command options]
COMMANDS:
generate, g Generate default configuration
OPTIONS:
--help, -h show help
```
If there is no `$ABRA_DIR/config.yml` or `sync: false`, nothing changes. When `sync: true`, *only* the `abra app deploy / upgrade / rollback` commands have new behaviour.
There is also a new command `abra app sync <domain>` which triggers a synchronisation.
When `abra app deploy/upgrade/rollback/sync` is run, here's what we do:
* Read the `OPERATOR_SYNC_VERSION` env var as the version to deploy / upgrade from / rollback from
* upgrade: if deployed version does not match `OPERATOR_SYNC_VERSION`, warn before overview
* rollback: same as above!
* Run the deployment
* if successful, record a new `OPERATOR_SYNC_VERSION`
* if unsuccessful, do not record a `OPERATOR_SYNC_VERSION` and ask operator to resolve
If `--chaos` is passed, we use the short commit hash instead of the version label.
Here's an example of the `OPERATOR_SYNC_VERSION` env var:
```
# in ~/.abra/servers/example.com/matrix.example.com.env
TYPE=matrix-synapse
OPERATOR_SYNC_VERSION=4.0.0+v1.93.0 # managed by Abra
```
Operator documentation will also be provided.
**Budget amount**: 200 EUR (10 hrs * 20 EUR/hr)
**Who will implement this**: (someone?)
**When will the money be spent**: Before mid-February 2024
**What is the money for**: Implementing the first steps of operator sync.

View File

@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 022"
---
- Topic: Budget 10: Abra integration suite automation
- Date: 04-04-2024
- Deadline: 18-04-2024
- Size: Large
### Summary
Motivated by the collective release planning:
[`#583`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/583) under
"Automate Integration Test Suite".
The latest `abra` release (`0.9.x`) was heavily delayed due to several issues.
One of those was the need to fix the integration test suite which wasn't run in
some time. Many breakages had crept into the test suite over time. This can
avoided in the future by automating the running of the integration test suite.
This proposal describes a way to do this and includes a budget for doing so.
### Details (Budget 10)
The `abra` test suite takes around 1.30 hrs to run on a modest machine.
Therefore, we propose to run it only once daily. Some parts of the tests are
slow, fast and only a few require public DNS. This means we can break up the
tests and run them in separate "builds" to speed things up. This involves some
research & experimentation.
A server has been provided by `@mirsal` on donation (💘). This machine will be
be wiped clean each day (`docker <command> prune ....`) and will have the usual
DNS machinery attached to it, e.g. `int.coopcloud.tech`, `*.int.coopcloud.tech`.
Once that is all wired up, we can implement the CI/CD configuration to make the
test suite run automatically once a day. This will be triggered via the
`.drone.yml` in the `abra` Git repository.
Budget details:
| Item | Cost | Who? |
| ---- | ---- | ---- |
| Server | Free (on donation) | `@mirsal` |
| Server setup & docs | 1 hour | `@d1` |
| R & D for breaking up tests | 5 hours | `@d1` |
| Implementing CI/CD configs | 10 hours | `@d1` |
**Total: 16 hrs * 20 EUR = 320 EUR**

View File

@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
---
title: Resolutions
---
### Resolution Template
``` yaml
---
title: Resolution <number>
---
- Topic: <title>
- Date: 13-12-2023
- Deadline: Date
- Size: large or medium
### Summary
Who this affects, and what it does...
### Details
A narrative with details...
```

View File

@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 001"
---
- Topic: Decision Making Process
- Date: 2023-03-03
- Deadline: 2023-03-03 (live voting)
- Size: large
### Summary
Institute descision making process as per below. Special consensus voting in organization meeting rather than the below process.
### Decision Making Process
* Write up a proposal using the below template, and add to the [Proposals wiki page](https://git.coopcloud.tech/Federation/Federation/wiki/Proposals).
* Specify if they are a large or medium proposal
* Votes are done via emoji-reaction in the Community Organising Matrix channel (<https://matrix.to/#/#coopcloud-comm-org:autonomic.zone>)
* List the decision on the [decisions page](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions) on our documentation
* Decisions can be split intro three categories: Small, Medium and Large.
* Votes can be in favour :+1:, against :-1: (block), or abstain :shrug:
* Announce the result in the [Federation chat (#coop-cloud-fedi:autonomic.zone)](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/intro/contact/#matrix) and record it on the [decisions page](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions) of the documentation
### Types of Proposals
#### Small - “Get on and do a thing”
* Up to individual members to decide if they should just make the decision, or share it with the rest of the members to seek consensus.
#### Medium - “consensus pending objections”
* Potentially about shared tools, recipes, abra, etc.
* Doesnt have an effect on the direction or operation of Co-op Cloud as a whole.
* If any member of Co-op Cloud thinks its a Large decision, achieve Maximum Consensus™ (see [below](https://pad.autonomic.zone/PtNbWo-7Tt-CKXvC6kxvZQ?view#Large---Maximum-Consensus-%E2%84%A2))
* proposals must have a minimum deadline of 2 weeks from when they are proposed
* Pass requirements:
* at least one :+1: vote
* no :-1: votes
#### Large - “Maximum Consensus ™”
* Important decisions affecting the operation, direction, working conditions and finances of Co-op Cloud.
* proposals must have a minimum deadline of 2 weeks from when they are proposed
* Pass requirements:
* more than 50% of total number of federation members :+1: votes
* no :-1: votes
### Proposal Template
```javascript
## Resolution <number>: <title> - <date>
- Deadline: Date
- Size: large or medium
### Summary
Who this affects, and what it does
### Details
A narritive with details
```

View File

@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 002"
---
* Topic: Membership/Dues
* Date: 2023-03-22
* Deadline: 2023-04-11
* Passed on 2023-04-13
* Size: Large
### Summary
1. Set membership dues for the Co-op Cloud Federation at EUR 10/month, to be reviewed in 6 months time, in October 2023.
2. Approval of new members requires a Large decision
3. Groups who had a member attend the first federation meeting are all founding members (are already in the federation, do not require a decision to be added)
### Details
Obviously this plan is not long-term financially sustainable. The idea is to use Autonomics remaining funds for the federation to collectivise the process of working this out over the next few months.
#### Dues
Members are required to make a minimum monthly EUR 10 (or EUR 60/year) donation through Open Collective. Members who are able are encouraged to donate more. Individuals/groups wanting to join Co-op Cloud who arent able to make a financial contribution may request a solidarity free membership.
#### Membership
To join the federation an existing member must create a large decision to approve of the new member (paid or solidarity). All collectives who attended the first federation meeting are already granted membership and are asked to setup recurring donations as soon as possible.

View File

@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 003"
---
* Topic: Paid work
* Date: 2023-03-22
* Deadline: 2023-04-11
* Passed on 2023-04-13
* Size: Large
### Summary
1. Set the wage for Co-op Cloud Federation work at €20/h. Review these numbers in 6 months time, in October 2023.
### Details
Work is paid at EUR 20/hour. This may be increased via future decisions if so desired by the collective.
Members must do their own taxes for wages earned. To get paid, worker members must invoice via the Co-op Cloud Open Collective. Invoices need to include times and descriptions.

View File

@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 004"
---
* Topic: Budget 001: Budgeting
* Date: 2023-03-22
* Deadline: 2023-04-11
* Passed on 2023-04-13
* Size: Large
### Summary
1. All paid work must be within a Budget
2. The first Budget as 8 hours / month, for member groups participation in organising meetings
### Details
All paid work must be within a Budget, agreed using a Large Decision. Budgets are ideally clumped as much as possible to reduce decision fatigue. Budgets include “who will do the work”. The agreed person can give the task to another Federation member.
Participation in organising meetings is paid for up to one person per member organisation. Additional people are welcome to attend; we encourage member organisations to pay for their additional attendees time themselves, if possible.
#### Budget: Monthly meetings
> **Budget amount:** EUR 960
>
> **Who will implement this:** Up to 1 person from each member organisation
>
> **When will the money be spent:** Over the next 6 months, until the meeting in October 2023.
>
> **What is the money for:** Paying attendees of monthly organising meetings
#### Budget template:
```
**Budget name:** Buying ponies
**Budget amount:** EUR 100,000
**Who will implement this:** Ade from Ponies.coop
**When will the work happen:** Tomorrow
**What is the money for:: Buying one pony for each member organisation
```

View File

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 005"
---
* Topic: Public federation membership, notes and decisions
* Date: 2023-04-14
* Deadline: 2023-04-17
* Passed: 2023-04-18
* Size: medium
### Summary
The following federation info will be made public on [`docs.coopcloud.tech/federation`](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/):
- Federation membership
- Meeting minutes
- Decisions which have passed
### Details
This will make the process of documenting easier to mutualise and increase transparency for those interested in joining. The [`git.coopcloud.tech/Federation`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/Federation/Federation/wiki/) wiki can still be used for storing private details such as bank account information. If members do not want to be listed, they can do so even when this decision passes.

View File

@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 006"
---
- Budget 002: Resolution Writing-up
- Date: 2023-05-29
- Deadline: 2022-06-12
- Size: Large
### Summary
Agree Budget 002, for €100 for @decentral1se to write up 2 resolutions.
### Details (Budget YYY)
**Budget amount**: EUR 100
**Who will implement this**: @decentral1se
**When will the money be spent**: By 2023-07-03
**What is the money for**: Writing up two Resolutions:
1. A buffer for federation common fund.
2. To set up a standing critical fixes budget each month until the buffer in (1) is hit

View File

@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 007"
---
- Topic: 1 year dues waiver for Doop.coop
- Date: 2023-06-19
- Deadline: 2023-07-03
- Size: Medium
### Summary
Waive membership dues for Doop.coop for the first year of their membership, from July 2023 to June 2024.
### Details
Yusf said:
> Hai! As our coop is a side gig, we've had a very low turnaround in the coop last fiscal. As such we've hadn't had the time to raise our revenue yet in this cycle so my question for the federation is:
> Is it possible for us (already joined), Doop Coop, to apply for this solidarity free membership the first year after which we'll be able to put in the fee?

View File

@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 008"
---
- Topic: Budget 003 Paying invoices
- Date: 2023-06-19
- Deadline: 2022-07-03
- Size: Large
### Summary
Agree Budget 003, for up to €20/month for an Autonomic member to pay invoices submitted for Co-op Cloud Federation work.
### Details (Budget 003)
**Budget amount**: EUR €20/month
**Who will implement this**: Autonomic
**When will the money be spent**: Monthly
**What is the money for**: Paying for the work involved in paying invoices submitted via OpenCollective.
## A note about decentralisation
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a good way to open this task to other Co-op Cloud Federation members, until we get a dedicated bank account for the Federation, but if anyone has ideas about this, please let us know!

View File

@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 009"
---
- Topic: Federation common fund buffer
- Date: 2023-07-03
- Deadline: 2023-07-17
- Size: Large
### Summary
The Co-op Cloud Federation has [a common fund](https://opencollective.com/coop-cloud#category-BUDGET) which can be used by federation members by proposing [budgets](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/004/).
With Resolution 009, we want to introduce the idea of a common fund buffer.
This buffer is proposed to be set at 1,500 EUR. When the buffer is reached, no more budgets can be proposed. When the fund increases once more, budgets can resume.
The buffer is in place to reserve funds for critical collective spending when we have limited income.
### Details
1,500 EUR is fairly arbitrarily chosen but seems to be a reasonable amount of money to cover situations where, e.g. we need to pay for servers, domains, mail accounts or other common critical infrastructure.

View File

@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 010"
---
- Topic: Budget 004: Critical fixes
- Date: 2023-07-03
- Deadline: 2023-07-17
- Size: Large
### Summary
We propose to have a standing budget of 10 hrs / month available for fixes in Abra, Co-op Cloud recipes and other critical tools (e.g. recipes.coopcloud.tech) in the Co-op Cloud ecosystem.
A fix is deemed critial when it is listed on this coop-cloud/organising board:
> https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/projects/24
This board is collectively gardened by Co-op Cloud participants (both federation members and not). The process for adding a ticket to the board requires getting confirmation from at least one other member of the federation.
This budget can be claimed by any volunteer who would like to develop the fix. If the volunteer is not a Co-op Cloud federation member, they must first be "vouched for" by a federation member. This is an informal process which can be arranged via the Matrix chat. This aims to assure agreement on timing and what the fix should contain beforehand.
Fixes can be claimed by assiging yourself to the ticket. If within 1 week there is no updates on the ticket, another volunteer can propose to take over. This process is also informal: please @ the original volunteer and give some reasonable time for them to reply (suggested: 1 day).
If the fix is urgent and things need to move faster, please state so on the ticket. Please consult with at least one other member of the federation to confirm that there is indeed agreement on the urgency of the fix.
### Details (Budget 004)
This budget stands open and available for use until the common fund buffer is reached. Please see [Resolution 009](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/009/) for further details on the buffer.
Please see [Resolution 003](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/003/) for details on the hourly rate for this work.
Invoices can be submitted via the Co-op Cloud Open Collective. Please see [these docs](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/finance/#how-to-get-paid-via-open-collective) for how to do that.

View File

@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 011"
---
- Topic: Budget 005: Backup improvements
- Date: 2023-07-23
- Deadline: 2022-08-06
- Size: Large
### Summary
Agree Budget 005, for up to 10 hours (€200) to implement changes to the Co-op Cloud backup system, including `abra`, and `backup-bot-two`.
More information, including background to the changes, and breakdown of the work, can be found here: https://pad.local-it.org/4chDYXkBQZywXKj0zs_Ymg#
### Details (Budget 005)
**Budget amount**: Up to EUR €200
**Who will implement this**: Calix/3wc, decentral1se, Philipp and Moritz
**When will the money be spent**: Before the end of August 2023.
**What is the money for**: Improvements to Co-op Cloud backup tools

View File

@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 012"
---
- Budget 006: Abra integration test suite
- Date: 2023-09-09
- Deadline: 2023-09-23
- Size: Large
### Summary
Recent attempts to continue developing features and fixes have lead to several regressions in Abra. It's more difficult to make progress and it's unclear if changes will create more bugs. Abra has always had bugs and we've relied on user testing to smoke those out.
However, we're reaching a scale where it's very difficult to test all changes with just user testing. Also, there is only so far you can go with user testing before bug fatigue and frustration is the norm.
It's time to build a robust Abra integration test suite which can help us stop regressions from happening and rely less on user testing. This will help us move forward with larger changes in Abra which we can then test and have confidence that the base functionality is not broken.
### Details (Budget 006)
References so far:
- [3wc & myself (d1) have had a planning meeting](https://pad.autonomic.zone/kdLrPXMSSb2TZezCBhdYtw?edit)
- [The first PR and proof of concept has landed in Abra](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/pulls/347)
- [Initial documentation has been written](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/abra/hack/#integration-tests)
With some further experimentation, I'm relatively confident that this approach will allow us to implement an integration test suite which covers the majority of the Abra functionality. It's *a lot* of work. I'm estimating this to come in at 30 hours of work.
**Budget amount**: 600 EUR (30 hrs * 20 EUR/hr)
**Who will implement this**: decentral1se
**When will the money be spent**: Before the end of October 2023.
**What is the money for**: Implementing an Abra integration test suite.

View File

@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 014"
---
- Topic: Budget 008: Critical Fixes
- Date: 2023-12-06
- Deadline: 2023-12-24
- Size: Large
## Summary
We (decentral1se, wykwit, moritz, knoflook) have identified bugs and lacking features that are a big obstacle to using abra.
We have roughly estimated the work to fix the bugs to take between 27 and 75 hours. We would also like to request onboarding budget for two new developers to smoothly get started on the bug fixes (10 hours per person).
We'd like to request no more than 1900€ of budget to cover the labor and onboarding. If less than 95 hours is spent, the remaining budget will not be paid out.
## Details
estimating: small (1-3 hours), medium (3-8 hours), large (8-15 hours) & order is priority.
| NAME | estimation |
| ---- | ----- |
| [#535 Comment parsing and modifiers](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/535) | Large |
| [#519 abra app new `[<recipe>]` `[<version>]`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/519) | Medium |
| [#518 Abra fails silently if required image doesn't exist](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/518) | Medium |
| [#527 abra catalogue generate `<recipe name>` ignores the specified recipe](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/527) | Small |
| [#509 abra app remove could wait until volume is not in use](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/509) | Medium |
| [#530 abra recipe fetch can only fetch a single recipe](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/530) | Medium |
| [#525 prevent abra app cp from applying file permissions.](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/525) | Medium |
| [#537 Fix the operators tutorial](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/537) | Medium |
Estimation: best case: (8 * 1) + (3 * 6) + (1 * 1) = 27 hours
Estimation: worst case: (15 * 1) + (8 * 6) + (1 * 3) = 73 hours
+ 10 hours for onboarding * 2 people = 47-93 hours
**Budget amount**: 1900€/95 hours at maximum
**Who will implement this:** p4u1, wykwit, moritz, knoflook
**When will the money be spent:** Before the end of February 2024.
**What is the money for:** Fixing bugs and improving operator docs.

View File

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 015"
---
- Topic: Klasse & Methode joins the Co-op Cloud Federation
- Date: 25-01-2024
- Deadline: 08-02-2024
- Size: Large
### Summary
[Klasse & Methode - IT Kollektiv Stuttgart](https://codeberg.org/Klasse-Methode).
`@p4u1` has been active in Abra hacking & coordination on several issues. K & M
manage a Co-op Cloud deployment with 9 apps running at the time of the
proposal.
### Details
K & M is volunteer based and are unable to pay the membership fees at this time
and ask for a waiver for 1 year. To be revisited on 25-01-2025.

View File

@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 016"
---
- Topic: Budget 008: Backup-bot-two Documentation and Specification
- Date: 27-01-2024
- Deadline: 10th February 2024
- Size: Large
### Summary
> (Co-written by p4u1 & d1)
The new backup-bot-two implementation is nearly finished. The only remaining step is to implement restore functionality. In a recently meeting with Moritz, p4u1 & d1, we discussed how to design and implement it. The mintues are [here](https://pad.riseup.net/p/UEC2JUPGb6tmRCZ7RX9X-keep).
In this meeting, we realised that there is already a lot of implicit, undocumented knowledge about how backup-bot-two & abra work together. How the restore interface will work is more or less designed in the meeting, with general agreement.
In order to communicate that design, we feel we need to have clear documentation and a specification on how things work. This will make sure we have consensus before commiting more budget to implementing the final step. It will also help operators pick up, use & extend backup-bot-two in the future.
In this resolution, we want to propose to write the initial documentation and specification for the new [backup-bot-two](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/backup-bot-two/).
The existing documentation for the old backupbot should be taken into account wherever possible.
### Details (Budget 008)
Documentation should be for:
- Operators using the backup-bot-two
- Maintainers of recipes
The documentation should have:
- Examples on using Abra with the backupbot
- Examples of recipe configurations
- Detailed explanation of features and their limitations
The Specification should include:
- Detailed specification on how annotations work
- With the specification it should be possible to implement backup and restore
without looking at the backupbot-two code
---
- Budget amount: 200 EUR (10 hrs * 20 EUR/hr)
- Who will implement this: p4u1
- When will the money be spent: Before the end of February
- What is the money for: Writing documentation and specification for backup-bot-two

View File

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 017"
---
- Topic: BeWater joins the Co-op Cloud Federation
- Date: 30-01-2024
- Deadline: 21-02-2024
- Size: Large
### Summary
> [BeWater Co-op](https://bewater.contact).
`@decentral1se` is a member and has been active in Abra hacking & coordination
on several issues. BeWater maintains several small-scale Co-op Cloud
deployments.
### Details
BeWater is just starting and we're currently unable to pay the membership fees
at this time and ask for a waiver for 1 year. To be revisited on 30-01-2025.

View File

@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 018"
---
- Topic: EOTL joins the Co-op Cloud Federation
- Date: 12-03-24
- Deadline: 26-03-2024
- Size: Large
### Summary
> [EOTL](https://codeberg.org/eotl)
[@basebuilder](https://git.coopcloud.tech/basebuilder) has been active in contributions
to the Co-op Cloud documentation and Abra testing.
### Details
N/A.

View File

@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Resolution 019"
---
- Topic: Karrot joins the Co-op Cloud Federation
- Date: 25-03-24
- Deadline: 08-04-2024
- Size: Large
### Summary
> [Karrot](https://karrot.world) / [Docs](https://docs.karrot.world)
[@nicksellen](https://git.coopcloud.tech/nicksellen) is a Karrot Team member and has:
- Used Co-op Cloud for [bath.social](https://bath.social)
- Supported Foodsharing Luxembourg to self-host Karrot using Co-op Cloud
- Participated in [`#coopcloud-tech:autonomic.zone`](https://matrix.to/#/#coopcloud-tech:autonomic.zone) chat
- Some small contributions/fixes/bug reports for some Co-op Cloud stuff
### Details
We, the Karrot Team, consented to apply to join during our weekly meeting ([minutes](https://community.karrot.world/t/weekly-call-about-karrot-development-2024/1510/10)) and are happy to contribute 60€/year.
We would enjoy a video call if our application is successful to introduce members of our wider team and connect a little more 🤗♥️

View File

@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
---
title: Digital tools
---
- [Public documentation](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation)
- [Organising repository (private)](https://git.coopcloud.tech/Federation/organising)
- [Wiki (private)](https://git.coopcloud.tech/Federation/organising/wiki)
- [Git hosting](https://git.coopcloud.tech/)
- [Matrix Space](https://matrix.to/#/#coop-cloud-space:autonomic.zone)
- [Website](https://coopcloud.tech/)
- [Drone CI/CD](https://build.coopcloud.tech)

View File

@ -6,17 +6,21 @@ title: Get Involved
> :trumpet: **You don't have to be a programmer to contribute to this project!** :trumpet:
Firstly, come say hello in our [chat room](/intro/contact/) if you'd like to help out or are interested to learn how :wave:
Firstly, come say hello in our [chat room](/intro/contact/) if you'd like to help out or re interested to learn how :wave:
We are happy to have designers, critical thinkers, artists, hackers, documenters, etc. involved in this project! There is a lot of work to do, if you find this project interesting, we want to have you working with us.
There are a number of "roles" such as "operator", "maintainer", "organiser" which we've tried to come up with to make it more clear how you can relate to the project and how you can find ways to be involved which suit your interests. If you don't fit one of these roles, that is fine.
We have [an irregular online check-in](/organisers/handbook/#kite-flying-hours) for contributors of this project to let each other know what we're working on, how much time we've spent on it and how to coordinate further work.
We have [a weekly check-in](/get-involved/#kite-flying-hours) for contributors of this project to let each other know what we're working on, how much time we've spent on it and how to coordinate further work.
We have a [status page](/intro/bikemap) showing what we are aiming to achieve in the near future. That gives a good overview of where we're going together.
We use [issue trackers](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues) and [project boards](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/projects) to keep track of what we're working on right now. We collectively review these, to keep track of our time spent vs. budget available.
From this status page, we use an [issue tracker](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues) where we hold discussions about what we want to do. We categorise these issues according to the bike map using these [milestones](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/milestones). Finally, use this [board](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/projects/8) to keep track of what we're working on right now. We collectively review these things on a weekly/monthly basis to keep track of our time spent vs. budget available.
Once you've found something to work on and are introduced, we'll give you an account on our [time tracking infrastructure](https://kimai.autonomic.zone) where you can log your times. This helps us reduce the burden of financial and time keeping admin falling on one person.
We have received funding via [the ECF](https://culturalfoundation.eu/initiatives/culture-of-solidarity-fund) and can offer £16 hourly rate for your work. We've written more on why we think it is important to compensate all contributions for this project below.
## Compensation

View File

@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Support Us"
---
If you like what you see whilst browsing Co-op Cloud and would like to
contribute financially, as opposed to with code, we currently receive donations
via an [Open Collective account](https://opencollective.com/coop-cloud).
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- __Infrastructure Support__
If you make use of our digital infrastructure and want to help out with
maintenance costs, we wold be grateful :heart:
[Donate Now](https://opencollective.com/coop-cloud/contribute/infrastructure-sustainability-29878/checkout){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Join The Federation__
If you want to be more actively involved as a supporter, consider joining
our Federation :handshake_tone2:
[Learn More](/federation/){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
</div>

View File

@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ An app is a libre software that you use, e.g. Wordpress, Gitea, Jitsi, Nextcloud
## Container
A [Docker](#docker) term: a running instance of an [image](#image), running processes that are isolated from the host system.
A [Docker](/glossary#docker) term: a running instance of an [image](/glossary#image), running processes that are isolated from the host system.
## Deployment
When you run `abra app deploy <domain>`, `abra` reads a [recipe](#recipe) configuration and creates an [app](#app).
When you run `abra app deploy <domain>`, `abra` reads a [recipe](/glossary#recipe) configuration and creates an [app](/glossary#app).
## Docker
@ -24,36 +24,36 @@ When you run `abra app deploy <domain>`, `abra` reads a [recipe](#recipe) config
## Environment variables
Variables passed from the shell to processes invoked by it. They are used for configuring [services](#service).
Variables passed from the shell to processes invoked by it. They are used for configuring [services](/glossary#service).
## Environment file
A file contained in a [recipe](#recipe) describing the contents of [environment variables](#environment-variables).
A file contained in a [recipe](/glossary#recipe) describing the contents of [environmental variables](/glossary#environment-variables).
## Image
A [Docker](#docker) term: a template for creating [containers](#container), describing their file structure and installed binaries.
A [Docker](/glossary#docker) term: a template for creating [containers](/glossary#container), describing their file structure and installed binaries.
## Proxy network
A [Docker](#docker) related concept: a virtual network created on the server machine used for communicating between [services](#service). Any [service](#service) can be plugged into more than one [network](#network), allowing for control over data sharing between them.
A [Docker](glossary#docker) related concept: a virtual network created on the server machine used for communicating between [services](/glossary#service). Any [service](/glossary#service) can be plugged into more than one [network](/glossary#network), allowing for control over data sharing between them.
## Recipe
A recipe is what we call the configuration files that are used to deploy an [app](#app). When you run `abra app deploy <domain>`, `abra` is reading a recipe configuration, such as [the gitea recipe](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/gitea), in order to know how to deploy a new Gitea instance. When we speak of a "digital configuration commons", we're primarily referring to the [growing collection of recipes](https://recipes.coopcloud.tech).
A recipe is what we call the configuration files that are used to deploy an [app](/glossary#app). When you run `abra app deploy <domain>`, `abra` is reading a recipe configuration, such as [the gitea recipe](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/gitea), in order to know how to deploy a new Gitea instance. When we speak of a "digital configuraiton commons", we're primarily referring to the [growing collection of recipes](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud).
## Secret
A [Docker](#docker) related concept: A way to store passwords encrypted on disk and mounted inside the [containers](#container) as files that can be read that contain the secret. See the [Docker secrets documentation for more](https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/secrets/). `abra` makes use of this approach to store secrets for deployed [apps](#app).
A [Docker](/glossary#docker) related concept: A way to store passwords encrypted on disk and mounted inside the [containers](/glossary#container) as files that can be read that contain the secret. See the [Docker secrets documentation for more](https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/secrets/). `abra` makes use of this approach to store secrets for deployed [apps](/glossary#app).
## Service
A [Docker](#docker) term: a single [container](#container) that is a part of a [stack](#stack).
A [Docker](glossary#docker) term: a single [container](/glossary#container) that is a part of a [stack](glossary#stack).
## Stack
A [Docker](#docker) term: one or more [services](#service) running together to provide a functionality.
A [Docker](glossary#docker) term: one or more [services](/glossary#service) running together to provide a functionality.
## Volume
A [Docker](#docker) term: a directory that can be mounted inside a [container](#container) to store data. Because [containers](#container) are meant to be non-changeable and disposable, any data that is supposed to not be lost between updates or restarts is stored in volumes.
A [Docker](/glossary#docker) term: a directory that can be mounted inside a [container](/glossary#container) to store data. Because [containers](/glossary#container) are meant to be non-changeable and disposable, any data that is supposed to not be lost between updates or restarts is stored in volumes.

View File

@ -16,15 +16,15 @@ We'd be happy to hear feedback about our documentation, if it was helpful, what
!!! danger "Here be dragons"
This project is still [beta quality software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta) :bomb: Please take that into consideration if you are thinking about using this system in production. We're working hard to make Co-op Cloud stable. In the meantime, this is a good time to help us out with initial testing, feedback, ideas or [join in with development](/get-involved/).
This project is still [alpha quality software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Alpha) :bomb: Please take that into consideration if you are thinking about using this system in production. We're working hard to make Co-op Cloud stable. In the meantime, this is a good time to help us out with initial testing, feedback, ideas or [join in with development](/get-involved/).
- [Operators guide](/operators/): You run a Co-op Cloud based deployment or want to do so :computer:
- [Operators guide](/operators/): You run a Co-op Cloud deployment or want to do so :computer:
- [Maintainers guide](/maintainers/): You maintain recipes and ensure things run smoothly for operators :tools:
- [Organisers guide](/organisers): You run meetings, write guidelines & shape our democratic process :fist:
- [Recipes](/abra/recipes/): You want to know what recipes are packaged so you can deploy them as apps :nerd:
- [Recipes](/recipes/): You want to know what recipes are packaged so you can deploy them as apps :nerd:
- [Abra](/abra): You want to install the command-line client and hack the planet :unicorn:

View File

@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
title: Bike map
---
- The project is currently in a [beta quality](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta) release state.
- The project is currently in an [alpha quality](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Alpha) release state.
- We are working towards a stable `1.0.0` release.
- We are working towards a [beta release](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta). Our public Beta goals are listed in the following pad: [Beta Bike Map](https://pad.autonomic.zone/s/C3uuqfSCk).
- What we're currently working on is listed on this issue tracker: [`coop-cloud/organising`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues).
- What we're currently working on is listed on this issue tracker: [`coop-cloud/organising`](https://git.autonomic.zone/coop-cloud/organising/issues).

View File

@ -1,180 +0,0 @@
---
title: Comparisons
---
We think it's important to understand that *Co-op Cloud* is more than just
software and technical configurations. It is also a novel organization of *how*
to [create technology socially](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation).
However, strictly technically speaking you may be wondering:
### What about `$alternative`?
We have various technical critiques of other similar projects which are already up-and-running in the ecosystem, as they don't necessarily meet our needs as a small tech co-op. However, Co-op Cloud isn't meant to be a replacement for these other projects.
Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and needs.
### Cloudron
[Cloudron](https://www.cloudron.io) is complete solution for running apps on your own server
**Pros**
- 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management.
- 👍 Large library of apps.
- 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth.
- 👍 Apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team.
**Cons**
- 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software.
- 👎 Libre tier has a single app limit.
- 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid visual editor for Mediawiki) are a non-starter.
- 👎 Difficult to extend apps.
- 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu LTS.
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user.
- 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps.
- 👎 Bit of a [black box](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_box).
### YunoHost
[YunoHost](https://yunohost.org) is an operating system aiming for the simplest administration of a server
**Pros**
- 👍 Lovely web interface for app, domain & user management.
- 👍 Bigger library of apps.
- 👍 Awesome backup / deploy / restore continuous integration testing.
- 👍 Supports hosting apps in subdirectories as well as subdomains.
- 👍 Doesn't require a public-facing IP.
- 👍 Supports system-wide mutualisation of resources for apps (e.g. sharing databases by default)
**Cons**
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Uninstalling apps leaves growing cruft.
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Not intended for use by hosting providers.
### Caprover
[CapRover](https://caprover.com) is an easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for applications
**Pros**
- 👍 Bigger library of apps.
- 👍 Easy set-up using a DigitalOcean one-click app.
- 👍 Works without a domain name or a public IP, in non-HTTPS mode (good for homeservers).
- 👍 Deploy any app with a `docker-compose.yml` file as a "One Click App" via the web interface.
- 👍 Multi-node (multi-server) set-up works by default.
**Cons**
- 👎 Single-file app definition format, difficult to tweak using entrypoint scripts.
- 👎 Nginx instead of Traefik for load-balancing.
- 👎 Command-line client requires NodeJS / `npm`.
- 👎 [Requires 512MB RAM for a single app](https://github.com/caprover/caprover/issues/28).
- 👎 [Backup/restore is "experimental"](https://caprover.com/docs/backup-and-restore.html), and doesn't currently help with backing up Docker volumes.
- 👎 Exposes its bespoke management interface to the internet via HTTPS by default.
### Ansible
[Ansible](https://www.ansible.com) mature automation and deployment tool.
**Pros**
- 👍 Includes server creation and bootstrapping.
**Cons**
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles.
- 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates.
### Kubernetes
[Kubernetes](https://kubernetes.io) (or K8s) is a system for automating deployment, scaling, and
management of containerized applications.
**Pros**
- 👍 Helm charts are available for some key apps already.
- 👍 Scale all the things.
**Cons**
- 👎 Too big -- requires 3rd party tools to run a single-node instance.
- 👎 Not suitable for a small to mid size hosting provider.
### Docker-compose
[Docker Compose](https://docs.docker.com/compose/) is a tool for defining and running multi-container applications.
**Pros**
- 👍 Quick to set up and familiar for many developers.
**Cons**
- 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring.
- 👎 Secret storage not available yet.
- 👎 Swarm is the new best practice.
### Doing it Manually (Old School)
If you are an absolute Shaman in a Shell and learning new gadgets just slows you down,
have it, but maybe ask how old [is old enough](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing_press)?
**Pros**
- 👍 Simple - just follow upstream instructions to install and update.
**Cons**
- 👎 Loads of manual work required for app isolation and backups.
- 👎 Array of sysadmin skills required to install and maintain apps.
- 👎 Hard to share configurations into the commons.
- 👎 No idea who has done what change when.
### Stackspin
[Stackspin](https://www.stackspin.net) deployment and management stack for a
handful of popular team collaboration apps.
**Pros**
- 👍 Easy instructions to install & upgrade multiple tightly integrated apps.
- 👍 Offers a unified SSO user experience.
- 👍 Offers tightly integrated logging, monitoring, and maintenance.
- 👍 Has a strong focus and attention to security.
**Cons**
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 It is not designed to be a general specification.
- 👎 Hard to share configurations into the commons.
- 👎 Significantly limited library of eight apps.
- 👎 Additional apps are treated as "External Apps" with only OAuth2/OpenID integration.
- 👎 Requires a Kubernetes cluster.
### Maadix
[Maadix](https://maadix.net) managed hosting and deployment of popular privacy preserving applications.
**Pros**
- 👍 Nice looking web interface for app, domain & user management.
- 👍 Offers a paid hosting service to get up and running easily.
**Cons**
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 It is not designed to be a general specification.
- 👎 Hard to share configurations into the commons.
- 👎 Limited library of apps.
- 👎 Uses *OpenNebula*, *Ansible*, and *Puppet* as underlying technologies.
- 👎 Appears to be only a team of two people.
- 👎 Appears to be inactive on Mastodon and limited GitLab activity.

View File

@ -2,33 +2,24 @@
title: Get in touch
---
We welcome developers, sys-admins, designers, UX folks, Q&A testers, and passionate users to join us.
Pick the right medium for your interests.
## Email
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
[`helo@coopcloud.tech`](mailto:helo@coopcloud.tech)
- __Chat__
## Chat
[Matrix](https://matrix.org) is our chat platform of choice, we are happy to hear from you there :speech_left:
### Matrix
[Join Chats](https://matrix.to/#/!xSMwGbdVehScXcIFwS:autonomic.zone?via=autonomic.zone&via=matrix.org&via=1312.media){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
Here is a link to the [Matrix space](https://matrix.to/#/!xSMwGbdVehScXcIFwS:autonomic.zone?via=autonomic.zone&via=matrix.org&via=1312.media) to see all channels.
- __Codebases__
- [`#coopcloud:autonomic.zone`](https://matrix.to/#/!JSVYWCRXSVMrAzgeKB:autonomic.zone?via=autonomic.zone) General chat and announcements (low traffic)
- [`#coopcloud-tech:autonomic.zone`](https://matrix.to/#/!IFazIpLtxiScqbHqoa:autonomic.zone?via=autonomic.zone) Technical discussions (some techno babble)
- [`#coopcloud-dev:autonomic.zone`](https://matrix.to/#/!IFazIpLtxiScqbHqoa:autonomic.zone?via=autonomic.zone) Intense developer chat (a lot of techno babble)
Get straight to looking at our code or filing issues, hop to our Gitea instance :sunglasses:
### XMPP
[Browse Code](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
> Coming Soon :tm:
- __Forum__
## Forum
If you prefer communicating asynchronously with topical categories :tropical_drink:
[Our Forum](https://community.coops.tech/){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Email__
If you like it old school, feel free to fire up port 25 and send us a `HELO` message :email:
[Email Us](mailto:helo@coopcloud.tech){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
</div>
[`community.coops.tech`](https://community.coops.tech/)

View File

@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ title: Credits & thanks
Special thanks to:
- [Doop Coop](mailto:cluck@doop.coop), for making a transparent version of the Co-op Cloud logo, Matrix room avatars and helping with OSX alpha testing.
- [Doop Coop](mailto:cluck@doop.coop), for making a transparent version of the Co-op Cloud logo, and helping with OSX alpha testing.
- [Social.coop](https://social.coop), for warmly welcoming us onto [`social.coop/@coopcloud`](https://social.coop/@coopcloud).
- [Servers.coop](https://servers.coop), for hosting our digital infrastructure (website, builds, git hosting, etc.).
- Every single last one of you heroic & patient beta testers, you are all comrades of the highest order of kropotkin :heart:
- [`egonelbre/gophers`](https://github.com/egonelbre/gophers) for the rad gopher logos
- Every single last one of you heroic & patient alpha/beta testers, you are all comrades of the highest order of kropotkin :heart:

View File

@ -8,43 +8,146 @@ Co-op Cloud aims to make hosting libre software apps simple for small service pr
## Who is behind the project?
The project was started by workers at [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone/) which
is a [worker-owned co-operative](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative) who provides
technologies and infrastructure to empower users to make a positive impact on
the world. Numerous other like minded co-ops have since joined our
[Federation](/federation/) and rely *Co-op Cloud* in production.
The project was started by workers at [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone/) which is a [worker-owned co-operative](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative). We provide technologies and infrastructure to empower users to make a positive impact on the world. We're using Co-op Cloud in production, amongst other systems.
## Why Co-op Cloud?
#### Pros
- 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling.
- 👍 Extremely modular.
- 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos.
- 👍 Focussed on hosting providers.
- 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging).
- 👍 Now and always libre software.
- 👍 Command line focussed.
- 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling.
- 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling
- 👍 Extremely modular
- 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos
- 👍 Focussed on hosting providers
- 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging)
- 👍 Now and always libre software
- 👍 Command line focussed
- 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling
#### Cons
- 👎 Still a very young project.
- 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps.
- 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use.
- 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more).
- 👎 Still a very young project
- 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps
- 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use
- 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more)
## Why start another project?
We think our carefully chosen blend of technologies and our [social approach](/federation/) is quite unique in today's technology landscape.
Please read our [initial project announcement post](https://autonomic.zone/blog/co-op-cloud/) for more on this.
Also see our [strategy page](../strategy/).
## How do I make a recipe for (package) an app?
Also see our [strategy page](/strategy/).
Head on over to **Maintainers** section and see ["Package your first recipe"](/maintainers/tutorial/#package-your-first-recipe) for more.
## How do I package an app?
See [the packager guide documentation](/packager-guide/#package-your-first-application) for more.
## What about `$alternative`?
We have various technical critiques of other similar projects which are already up-and-running in the ecosystem, as they don't necessarily meet our needs as a small tech co-op. However, Co-op Cloud isn't meant to be a replacement for these other projects.
Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and needs.
### Cloudron
#### Pros
- 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management.
- 👍 Large library of apps.
- 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth.
- 👍 apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team.
#### Cons
- 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software.
- 👎 libre tier has a single app limit.
- 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid visual editor for Mediawiki) are a non-starter.
- 👎 Difficult to extend apps.
- 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu LTS.
- 👎 Upstreams libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user.
- 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps.
- 👎 Bit of a [black box](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_box).
### YunoHost
#### Pros
- 👍 Lovely web interface for app, domain & user management.
- 👍 Bigger library of apps.
- 👍 Awesome backup / deploy / restore continuous integration testing.
- 👍 Supports hosting apps in subdirectories as well as subdomains.
- 👍 Doesn't require a public-facing IP.
- 👍 Supports system-wide mutualisation of resources for apps (e.g. sharing databases by default)
#### Cons
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Uninstalling apps leaves growing cruft.
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Not intended for use by hosting providers.
### Caprover
#### Pros
- 👍 Bigger library of apps.
- 👍 Easy set-up using a DigitalOcean one-click app.
- 👍 Works without a domain name or a public IP, in non-HTTPS mode (good for homeservers).
- 👍 Deploy any app with a `docker-compose.yml` file as a "One Click App" via the web interface.
- 👍 Multi-node (multi-server) set-up works by default.
#### Cons
- 👎 Single-file app definition format, difficult to tweak using entrypoint scripts.
- 👎 Nginx instead of Traefik for load-balancing.
- 👎 Command-line client requires NodeJS / `npm`.
- 👎 [Requires 512MB RAM for a single app](https://github.com/caprover/caprover/issues/28).
- 👎 [Backup/restore is "experimental"](https://caprover.com/docs/backup-and-restore.html), and doesn't currently help with backing up Docker volumes.
- 👎 Exposes its bespoke management interface to the internet via HTTPS by default.
### Ansible
#### Pros
- 👍 Includes server creation and bootstrapping.
#### Cons
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles
- 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates
### Kubernetes
#### Pros
- 👍 Helm charts are available for some key apps already.
- 👍 Scale all the things.
#### Cons
- 👎 Too big -- requires 3rd party tools to run a single-node instance.
- 👎 Not suitable for a small to mid size hosting provider.
### Docker-compose
#### Pros
- 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring.
- 👎 Secret storage not available yet.
- 👎 [Swarm is the new best practice](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8#issuecomment-367575011).
### Doing it Manually (Old School)
#### Pros
- 👍 Simple - just follow upstream instructions to install and update.
#### Cons
- 👎 Loads of manual work required for app isolation and backups.
- 👎 Array of sysadmin skills required to install and maintain apps.
- 👎 Hard to share configurations into the commons.
- 👎 No idea who has done what change when.
## Which technologies are used?
@ -73,13 +176,13 @@ This means that we can patch our app containers directly in conversation with up
We definitely recommend using best-in-class security auditing tools like [docker-bench-security](https://github.com/docker/docker-bench-security), IDS systems like [OSSEC](https://www.ossec.net/), security profiles like [Apparmor](https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/apparmor/) and hooking these into your existing monitoring, alert and update maintenance flows.
It's up to you how you want to arrange your system. For example, Co-op Cloud also allows you to compartmentalise different apps onto different servers. You could stack a bunch of apps on one big server or you could deploy one app per server.
It's up to how you want to arrange your system. For example, Co-op Cloud also allows you to compartmentalise different apps onto different servers. You could stack a bunch of apps on one big server or you could deploy one app per server.
These are organisational concerns that Co-op Cloud can't solve for you which any software system will require. See this [additional question](/intro/faq/#what-is-important-to-consider-when-running-containers-in-production) for further information.
These are organisational concerns that Co-op Cloud can't solve for you which any software system will require. See this [additional question](/faq/#what-is-important-to-consider-when-running-containers-in-production) for further information.
## What is important to consider when running containers in production?
The Co-op Cloud uses [containers](#why-containers) as a fundamental building block. Therefore it is important to be aware of some general principles for container management in production environments. These are typically things that you will want to discuss within your co-op or democratic collective about how to prioritise and build up process for.
The Co-op Cloud uses [containers](/faq/#why-containers) as a fundamental building block. Therefore it is important to be aware of some general principles for container management in production environments. These are typically things that you will want to discuss within your co-op or democratic collective about how to prioritise and build up process for.
However, as the Co-op Cloud project is still very young, we're also still thinking about how we can make the platform itself mitigate problematic issues and make the maintenance of containers a more stable experience.
@ -107,28 +210,13 @@ We are happy to see the compose specification emerging as a new open standard be
## Why Docker Swarm?
While many have noted that "swarm is dead" it is in fact [not dead](https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-support-and-develop-docker-swarm/) (2020). As detailed in the [architecture overview](/intro/strategy/#container-orchestrator), *Swarm* offers an appropriate feature set which allows us to support zero-down time upgrades, seamless app rollbacks, automatic deploy failure handling, scaling, hybrid cloud setups and maintain a decentralised design.
While many have noted that "swarm is dead" it is in fact [not dead](https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-support-and-develop-docker-swarm/). As detailed in the [architecture overview page](/overview/#container-orchestrator), swarm offers an appropriate feature set which allows us to support zero-down time upgrades, seamless app rollbacks, automatic deploy failure handling, scaling, hybrid cloud setups and maintain a decentralised design.
While the industry is bordering on a [k8s](https://kubernetes.io/) obsession and the need to [scale down](https://microk8s.io/) a tool that was fundamentally built for massive scale, we are going with *Swarm* because it is the tool most suitable for [small technology](https://small-tech.org/).
While the industry is bordering on a [k8s](https://kubernetes.io/) obsession and the need to [scale down](https://microk8s.io/) a tool that was fundamentally built for massive scale, we are going with swarm because it is the tool most suitable for [small technology](https://small-tech.org/).
The _Co-op Cloud Communitys_ forecast at the start of 2024 for the future of *Docker Swarm* is positive after five years after *Mirantiss* acquisition of Docker Enterprise
in 2018. Since then, their strategy has developed towards using *Docker Swarm* as an intermediary step between Docker/Docker-Compose, and *Kubernetes* where
previously it seemed like their aim was to migrate all their customers [deployments to Kubernetes](https://www.mirantis.com/blog/kubernetes-vs-swarm-these-companies-use-both) (Oct, 2022).
*Mirantis* acquired Docker Enterprise in 2019 and today delivers enterprise-grade Swarm—either as a managed service or with enterprise support through Mirantis Kubernetes Engine.
There is reasonably healthy activity in their issue tracker with label [`area/swarm`](https://github.com/moby/moby/issues?q=+label%3Aarea%2Fswarm+).
Additionally, we see it as reassuring that *Mirantis* has a growing number of pages relating to *Docker Swarm*:
- [Mirantis' Product Page](https://www.mirantis.com/software/swarm/)
- [What's next for Swarm: New features, the same world-class support](https://www.mirantis.com/blog/what-s-next-for-swarm) (Oct, 2022)
- [Docker Swarm Still Thriving Three Years after Mirantis Acquisition](https://www.mirantis.com/company/press-center/company-news/docker-swarm-still-thriving-three-years-after-mirantis-acquisition-often-running-side-by-side-with-kubernetes/) (Nov, 2022)
Lastly, its worth mentioning that much of the configuration involved in setting up *Docker Swarm*, particularly in terms of preparing images, and in managing the conceptual side, are transferable to other orchestration engines.
We hope to see a container orchestrator tool that is not directly linked to a for-profit company emerge soon but for now, this is what we have.
If you want to learn more, see [dockerswarm.rocks](https://dockerswarm.rocks/) for a nice guide.
See also this list of [`awesome-swarm`](https://github.com/BretFisher/awesome-swarm) by Bret Fisher.
## What licensing model do you use?
@ -138,7 +226,7 @@ The Co-op Cloud is and will always be available under [copyleft licenses](https:
It is true that if you install 3 apps and each one requires a MySQL database, then you will have 3 installations of MySQL on your system, running in containers.
Systems like [YunoHost](#yunohost) mutualise every part of the system for maximum resource efficiency - if there is a MySQL instance available on the system, then just make a new database there and share the MySQL instance instead of creating more.
Systems like [YunoHost](/faq/#yunohost) mutualise every part of the system for maximum resource efficiency - if there is a MySQL instance available on the system, then just make a new database there and share the MySQL instance instead of creating more.
However, as we see it, this creates a tight coupling between apps on the database level - running a migration on one app where you need to turn the database off takes down the other apps.
@ -160,18 +248,4 @@ Yes! Horizontal scaling is one of the ways Co-op Cloud can really shine. `abra`
## Why only x86 support?
We would love to do ARM support and hope to get there! We've been testing this and [ran into some issues](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/25). The TLDR; is that a lot of upstream libre app developer communities are not publishing container builds that support ARM. If they are, there are typically subtle differences in the conventions used to build the image as they are mostly done by community members and not directly taken on by the upstream project themselves. Since one of the core goals is to coordinate and reuse upstream packaging work, we see that ARM support requires a lot of organising and community engagement. Perhaps projects themselves will not want to take on this burden? It is not the role of the Co-op Cloud to set up an entire ARM publishing work flow at this moment in time. We see the benefits of supporting ARM and if you've got ideas / thoughts / approaches for how to make progress here, [please get in touch](/intro/contact/).
Update: [Can I run Co-op Cloud on ARM?](/operators/handbook/#can-i-run-co-op-cloud-on-arm)
## Why would an activist group use Co-op Cloud infrastructure over private cloud infrastructure (e.g. AWS, Azure, GCP)?
If your group is powerful enough to have generated opposition, it's not implausible that some law enforcement body may be trying to stymie your group's advances. To do this, law enforcement bodies may and probably will collaborate with big tech. Indeed, Big Tech has consistently shown a quick willingness to cooperate with Law Enforcement agencies (a la Snowden-revealed NSA subpoenas, [disallowing Signal to domain front](https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/02/signal-could-get-kicked-out-of-amazon-web-services/) and other such incidents where [Big Tech aided governments in hunting activists](http://discourse.leagueofconcernedusers.org/t/activist-infrastructures/69?u=themoonisblue)).
If your group has ambitions that generate enough fury in your opposition, you should think twice about where you store your data and whose services you rely on to store your data.
By using Co-op Cloud infrastructure over private cloud infrastructure, you create a few possibilities:
- You may interact with a server provider that is more ethical than Big Tech. Although the server provider may still succumb to law enforcement, you might place more trust in some providers than in private cloud providers (e.g. AWS).
- You may be able to situate your servers in locations that are relatively more impervious to law enforcement attempts to dismantle your infrastructure. Indeed, if you deployed your infrastructure in a relatively secure setting such as Switzerland, then you would weather a greater chance of keeping your infrastructure alive than if you deployed it in, say, the United States. Protonmail and [Extinction Rebellion (XR)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_O3zj3p52A) choose Switzerland for their servers, for reasons along these lines.
We would love to do ARM support and hope to get there! We've been testing this and [ran into some issues](https://git.autonomic.zone/coop-cloud/organising/issues/25). The TLDR; is that a lot of upstream libre app developer communities are not publishing container builds that support ARM. If they are, there are typically subtle differences in the conventions used to build the image as they are mostly done by community members and not directly taken on by the upstream project themselves. Since one of the core goals is to coordinate and reuse upstream packaging work, we see that ARM support requires a lot of organising and community engagement. Perhaps projects themselves will not want to take on this burden? It is not the role of the Co-op Cloud to set up an entire ARM publishing work flow at this moment in time. We see the benefits of supporting ARM and if you've got ideas / thoughts / approaches for how to make progress here, [please get in touch](/intro/contact/).

View File

@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
---
title: Inspirations
---
* [Dmytri Kleiner: "You can't code away their wealth"](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=FEU632_Em3g). Also, [The Telekommunist Manifesto](https://www.networkcultures.org/_uploads/%233notebook_telekommunist.pdf). Reading / checking out Kleiners work is a must IMHO -- `@decentral1se`.
* [CoopCycle](https://coopcycle.org/en/) - heavily inspired the Federation model and how we shaped the first decisions on how to do it. -- `@decentral1se`

View File

@ -6,8 +6,6 @@ title: Managed hosting
If you're a co-operative or a tech collective who wants to appear on this list, please [get in touch](/intro/contact/)! We want to expand the number of service providers using the Co-op Cloud so that project is more widely available to end-users and organisations who can influence the direction and co-fund the development.
The Co-op Cloud is still [beta quality software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta) :bomb: but you can still work with a tech co-op or collective to host some part or all of your online digital services with it. Organisations who want to support the project can get in touch with Co-op Cloud service providers via the following list for a quote on what they're looking for and how much it will cost. Service providers can then factor in some percentage of the cost to co-fund the development of this project.
The Co-op Cloud is still [alpha quality software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Alpha) :bomb: but you can still work with a tech co-op or collective to host some part or all of your online digital services with it. Organisations who want to support the project can get in touch with Co-op Cloud service providers via the following list for a quote on what they're looking for and how much it will cost. Service providers can then factor in some percentage of the cost to co-fund the development of this project.
- [Autonomic Co-op](https://autonomic.zone) (contact: [`helo@autonomic.zone`](mailto:helo@autonomic.zone))
- [Local-IT](https://local-it.org/) (contact [`info@local-it.org`](mailto:info@local-it.org))
- [Solisoft](https://solisoft.top) (contact [`contact@solisoft.top`](mailto:contact@solisoft.top))

View File

@ -1,105 +1,19 @@
---
title: Project Strategy
title: Project strategy
---
From our experiences working and organising as Autonomic, the tech co-op who [initiated Co-op Cloud](https://autonomic.zone/blog/co-op-cloud/), we know that the progressive tech movement lack reliable and cost-effective technical means for providing a sustainable alternative to _Big Tech_© services which are marketed as "[cloud computing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing)".
!!! note "Yes, we are blog"
## Technological Saviors?
Some leading thoughts are outlined in the [project launch blog post](https://autonomic.zone/blog/co-op-cloud/) also.
From our experiences working and organising as Autonomic, the tech co-op who initiated Co-op Cloud, we know that the progressive tech movement lack reliable and cost-effective technical means for providing an alternative to “Big Tech” cloud services.
The urgency for providing an alternative comes out of the understanding that the concentration of our digital lives within the private sphere of corporate providers (e.g. [GAFAM](https://degooglisons-internet.org/en/)) represents a loss of freedom due to the threat to our privacy and self-determination through surveillance and monopolisation.
As a movement, we cannot compete with corporate providers in terms of cost and scale. Their network effects and available capital means that no one project, product or organisation can create the required shift to a more widespread public interest technology.
> Technology alone will not save us
>
> Simply deploying libre software is not enough.
Technology alone will not save us. Simply deploying libre software is not enough.
Our strategy is to mutualise our resources to facilitate this shift. _Co-op Cloud_ is an attempt to create a new shared resource - an open and democratically managed, open standards based, copyleft licensed, libre software infrastructure project.
Our strategy is to mutualise our resources to facilitate this shift. Co-op Cloud is an attempt to create a new shared resource - an open and democratically managed, open standards based, copyleft licensed, libre software infrastructure project.
From this base, we can focus on the urgent and necessary social organising work that goes beyond the technical question.
## The Moving Parts
_Co-op Cloud_ is made up of a few simple, composable pieces. The system does not rely on any one specific implementation: each part may be replaced and/or extended as needed. We want to build a resilient and long-term sustainable project and that means allowing for different implementations, open formats and a diverse project organisation. Here are the main technical concepts listed below,
``` mermaid
graph LR
A[Libre Software\n Apps] --> B{Recipe Packaging};
B --> C[CLI Tool];
C --> D[Container\n Orchestrator];
```
Once you [grok](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok) this, you grok the moving parts of the entire project. You can then move on to [deploying your first app](/operators/tutorial/#deploy-your-first-app).
### Libre Software Apps
Libre software apps are tools- they take the shape of websites, mobile apps, and software clients that you may already use in your daily life, for example...
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- :simple-nextcloud: __Nextcloud__
- :simple-jitsi: __Jitsi__
- :simple-wikimediacommons: __Mediawiki__
- :fontawesome-solid-rocket: __Rocket.chat__
</div>
...and many more. These apps are also often referred to as _open-Source_ or _Free-Software_. These are tools that are created by volunteer communities who use [free software licenses] in order to build up the public software commons and offer more digital alternatives to [proprietary systems].
The communities who develop these softwares also publish them using [containers]. For example, here is the [Nextcloud hub.docker.com account] which allows end-users to quickly deploy a new Nextcloud instance.
There is a growing consensus in the free software community that containers are a useful and time saving format for distribution.
!!! question "Why did you choose to use containers?"
Learn more [in the FAQ section](/intro/faq/#why-containers).
[free software licenses]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
[nextcloud hub.docker.com account]: https://hub.docker.com/_/nextcloud
[proprietary systems]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software
[containers]: https://www.docker.com/resources/what-container
### Recipe Packaging Format
However, just having a container of an app is often not enough. The work required to deploy that app in a "production ready" setup is still too time intensive and often involves a duplication of effort.
Each service provider needs to deal with the same problems: stable versioning, backup plan, secret management, upgrade plan, monitoring and the list goes on.
Individual free software projects can't take on all this responsibility. They provide the containers as is, in a secure and ready-to-go manner but it is up to service providers to worry about how the app is deployed.
Therefore, Co-op Cloud proposes a packaging format, which we refer to as a recipe, that describes the entire production state of the app in a single place. This format uses the existing [standards based compose specification].
This is a file format which is most commonly used by the [Docker compose] tool but Co-op Cloud **does not** require the use of Docker compose itself. Furthermore, as described below, we also don't rely on the actual Docker CLI itself either. We do however use a lot of the underlying libraries.
!!! question "Why did you choose to use the compose specificiation?"
Learn more [in the FAQ section](/intro/faq/#why-use-the-compose-specification).
[Each recipe] that Co-op cloud provides is described using the compose specification and makes use of the upstream project published container when possible (sometimes they don't publish one!).
This is the core of our approach to working with the ecosystem of free software communities. We want to maximise the chances of sharing work, knowledge and build solidarity through concrete co-operation.
[standards based compose specification]: https://compose-spec.io
[docker compose]: https://docs.docker.com/compose/
[each recipe]: /recipes/
### Container Orchestrator
Once we have our app packaged as a recipe, we need a deployment environment (e.g. a server & something to keep the containers running). Production deployments are typically expected to support a number of features which give hosters and end-users guarantees for stability.
The Co-op cloud makes use of [Docker swarm] as a deployment environment. It offers an approriate feature set which allows us to support zero-down time upgrades, seamless app rollbacks, automatic deploy failure handling, scaling, hybrid cloud setups and maintain a decentralised design.
!!! question "Why did you choose to use Docker Swarm?"
Learn more [in the FAQ section](/intro/faq/#why-docker-swarm).
[docker swarm]: https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/
### Command-line tool
Finally, we need a tool to read the recipe package format and actually deploy the app. For this, we have developed and published the [abra] command-line tool.
`abra` aims at providing a simple command-line interface for managing your own Co-op Cloud. You can bootstrap machines with the required tools, create new apps and deploy them. `abra` is written in [Go](https://go.dev/) and uses a lot of the libraries that the `docker` and `docker-compose` CLIs use but does not rely on those interfaces directly.
`abra` is our flagship command-line client but it does not need to be the only client. `abra` was designed in such a way that it complements a workflow which can still be done completely manually. If Co-op Cloud goes away tomorrow, our configuration commons would still be useful and usable.
[abra]: /abra/

View File

@ -6,19 +6,6 @@ title: Packaging handbook
You can run `abra recipe new <recipe>` to generate a new `~/.abra/recipes/<recipe>` repository. The generated repository is a copy of [`coop-cloud/example`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/example).
## Hacking on an existing recipe
!!! warning
It is *very advisable* to disable any `healthcheck: ...` configuration
while hacking on new recipes. This is because it is very easy to mess up
and it will stop Traefik or other web proxies routing the app. You can
enable a specific healthcheck later when your recipe is stable. The default
"unconfigured" healthcheck behaviour is much less strict and it's faster to
get something up and running.
If you want to make changes to an existing recipe then you can simply edit the files in `~/.abra/recipes/<recipe-name>` and run pass `--chaos` to the `deploy` command when deploying those changes. `abra` will not deploy unstaged changes to avoid instability but you can tell it to do so with `--chaos`. This means you can simply hack away on the existing recipe files on your local file system and then when something is working, submit a change request to the recipe upstream.
## How is a recipe structured?
### `compose.yml`
@ -27,7 +14,7 @@ This is a [compose specification](https://compose-spec.io/) compliant file that
### `.env.sample`
This file is a skeleton for environmental variables that should be adjusted by the user. Examples include: domain or PHP extension list. Whenever you create a new app with `abra app new` this file gets copied to the `~/.abra/servers/<server-domain>/<app-domain>.env` and when you run `abra app config <app-domain>` you're editing this file.
This file is a skeleton for environmental variables that should be adjusted by the user. Examples include: domain or php extention list. Whenever you create a new app with `abra app new` this file gets copied to the `~/.abra/servers/<server-domain>/<app-domain>.env` and when you run `abra app config <app-domain>` you're editing this file.
### `abra.sh`
@ -39,7 +26,7 @@ After docker creates the filesystem and copies files into a new container it run
For a simple example check the [entrypoint.sh for `croc`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/croc/src/commit/2f06e8aac52a3850d527434a26de0a242bea0c79/entrypoint.sh). In this case, `croc` needs the password to be exported as an environmental variable called `CROC_PASS`, and that is exactly what the entrypoint does before running vendor entrypoint.
If you write your own entrypoint, it needs to be specified in the `config` section of compose.yml. See [this handbook entry](/maintainers/handbook/#how-do-i-set-a-custom-entrypoint) for more.
If you write your own entrypoint, it needs to be specified in the `config` section of compose.yml. See [this handbook entry](http://localhost:8000/maintainers/handbook/#entrypoints) for more.
### `releases/` directory
@ -88,26 +75,13 @@ export NGINX_CONFIG_VERSION=v1
## Manage environment variables
!!! warning
Please read this section carefully to avoid deployment footguns for the
operators who deploy your recipe configuration. It's important to
understand how to add new env vars into the recipe configuration in a
non-breaking manner. Thanks for reading!
When you define an environment variable in an `.env.sample` for a recipe, such as:
When you define an environment variable in a `.env.sample` for a recipe, such as:
```bash
FOO=123
```
This defines an env var which then needs to be added by an operator to their app env file. If you would like to add an env var which is optional, you can do:
```bash
#FOO=123
```
In order to expose this env var to recipe configuration, you pass this via the `environment` stanza of a service config in the recipe like so:
And you pass this via the `environment` stanza of a service config in the recipe like so:
```yaml
service:
@ -124,16 +98,6 @@ You can also access it in your configs using the following syntax:
{{ env "FOO" }}
```
### Global environment variables
- `TYPE`: specifies the recipe name
- `DOMAIN`: specifies the app domain
- `LETS_ENCRYPT_ENV`: TODO
- `TIMEOUT`: specifies the time in seconds to wait until all services have started and passed the health checks
- `ENABLE_AUTO_UPDATE`: if set to `true`, the auto-updater `kadabra` can update this app (see [this auto updater entry](/operators/tutorial/#automatic-upgrades) for more)
- `POST_DEPLOY_CMDS="<container> <command> <arguments>|<container> <command> <arguments>|... "` specifies commands that should be executed after each `abra app deploy`
- `POST_UPGRADE_CMDS="<container> <command> <arguments>|<container> <command> <arguments>|... "` specifies commands that should be executed after each `abra app upgrade`
## Manage secret data
Adding a secret to your recipe is done:
@ -256,11 +220,11 @@ file_env "DB_PASSWORD"
Sometimes the containers don't even have Bash installed on them. You had better just use `/bin/sh` or, in your entrypoint script, install Bash :upside_down: The entrypoint secrets hack listed above doesn't work in this case (as it requires Bash), so instead you can just do `export FOO=$(cat /run/secrets/<secret-name>)`.
## How do I reference services in configs?
## Reference services in configs?
When referencing an `app` service in a config file, you should prefix with the `STACK_NAME` to avoid namespace conflicts (because all these containers sit on the traefik overlay network). You might want to do something like this `{{ env "STACK_NAME" }}_app` (using the often obscure dark magic of the Golang templating language). You can find examples of this approach used in the [Peertube recipe](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/peertube/src/commit/d1b297c5a6a23a06bf97bb954104ddfd7f736568/nginx.conf.tmpl#L9).
## How are recipes versioned?
## How are recipes are versioned?
We'll use an example to work through this. Let's use [Gitea](https://hub.docker.com/r/gitea/gitea).
@ -391,18 +355,12 @@ If you don't have time or are not an operator, reach out on our communication ch
In the root of your recipe repository, run the following (if the folder doesn't already exist):
```
mkdir -p release
mkdir -p releases
```
And then create a text file which corresponds to the version release, e.g. `1.1.0+5.9.0` and write some notes. `abra` will show these when another operator runs `abra app deploy` / `abra app upgrade`.
You can also add release notes for the next release into a special file `releases/next`. This file will be used when running `abra recipe release`.
!!! warning "Not available previous versions of Abra"
Using `releases/next` is only available in > 0.9.x series of `abra`.
## How do I generate the recipe catalogue
## Generate the recipe catalogue
To generate an entire new copy of the catalogue:
@ -431,35 +389,7 @@ You can pass `--publish` to have `abra` automatically publish those changes.
In order to have `abra` publish changes for you automatically, you'll have to have write permissons to the git.coopcloud.tech repository and your account must have a working SSH key configuration. `abra` will use the SSH based URL connection details for Git by automagically creating an `origin-ssh` remote in the repository and pushing to it.
## How is I make the catalogue automatically regenerate after new versions are published?
"I'd like to make it so that whenever I push a new git tag to the
[`coop-cloud/rallly` repository](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/rallly)
(probably [using `abra recipe
release`](#how-do-i-release-a-new-recipe-version)), it automatically does the
[recipe catalogue generation steps](#how-do-i-generate-the-recipe-catalogue)"
1. Check whether tag builds are already trying to run: go to
https://build.coopcloud.tech, search for the recipe name (in this case taking
you to https://build.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/rallly/settings). If there are
failing builds, or if you see builds succeeding but catalogue regeneration
doesn't seem to be happening, then either dive in and try and fix it, or ask
for help in [`#coopcloud-tech`](https://matrix.to/#/#coopcloud-tech:autonomic.zone)
2. Otherwise, click "activate repository". You probably want to set the "disable pull
requests" and "disable forks" options; they won't work anyway, but the
failures might be confusing.
3. Make sure there is a `generate recipe catalogue` step in the recipe's
`.drone.yml` -- if there isn't, you can copy [the one from
`coop-cloud/rallly`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/rallly/src/branch/main/.drone.yml#L24-L38) unchanged.
4. That's it! Now, when you push a new tag, the recipe catalogue will regenerate
automatically. You can test this by re-pushing a tag (e.g. `git push origin
:0.5.0+3.5.1 && git push 0.5.0+3.5.1`)
## How does automatic catalogue regeneration work?
TODO
## How do I enable healthchecks
## Enable healthchecks
A healthcheck is an important and often overlooked part of the recipe configuration. It is part of the configuration that the runtime uses to figure out if a container is really up-and-running. You can tweak what command to run, how often and how many times to try until you assume the container is not up.
@ -476,7 +406,7 @@ If you're just starting off with packaging a recipe, you can use `healthcheck: d
`abra app errors -w <domain>` will show what errors are being reported from a failing healtcheck setup.
## How do I tune deploy configs?
## Tuning deploy configs
A bit like healtchecks, there is no universal setup. A good default seems to be the following configuration:
@ -497,13 +427,13 @@ Setting a restart policy is also good so that the runtime doesn't try to restart
Best to [read](https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#healthcheck) [the docs](https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/compose-file-v3/#healthcheck) on this one.
## How do I tune resource limits?
## Tuning resource limits
If you don't place resource limits on your app it will assume it can use the entire capacity of the server it is on. This can cause issues such as Out-Of Memory errors for your entire swarm.
If you don't place resource limits on your app it will assume it can use the entire capacity of the server it is on. This can cause issues such as OOM eerors for your entire swarm.
See the [Docker documentation](https://docs.docker.com/config/containers/resource_constraints/) to get into this topic and check the other recipes to see what other maintainers are doing.
## How do I enable A+ SSL ratings?
## Enable A+ SSL ratings
If you want to get the highest rating on SSL certs, you can use the following traefik labels which use a tweaked Traefik configuration.
@ -514,7 +444,7 @@ If you want to get the highest rating on SSL certs, you can use the following tr
See [this PR](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/traefik/pulls/8/files) for the technical details
## How do I change secret generation length?
## Tweaking secret generation length
It is possible to tell `abra` which length it should generate secrets with from your recipe config.
@ -532,250 +462,3 @@ When using this length specifier, `abra` will not use the "easy to remember
word" style generator but instead a string of characters to match the exact
length. This can be useful if you have to generate "key" style values instead
of passwords which admins have to type out in database shells.
## How are recipes added to the catalogue?
> This is so far a manual process which requires someone who's been added to the
> `coop-cloud` "Organisation" on https://git.coopcloud.tech. This is a temporary
> situation, we want to open out this process & also introduce some automation
> to support making thie process more convenient. Please nag us to move things
> along.
- Publish your new recipe on the [git.coopcloud.tech](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud) "Organisation"
- Run `abra catalogue generate <recipe> -p`
- Run `cd ~/.abra/catalogue && make`
These minimal steps will publish a new recipe with no versions. You can also do
the [recipe release publishing dance](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/maintainers/handbook/#how-do-i-release-a-new-recipe-version)
which will then extend the `versions: [...]` section of the published JSON in the catalogue.
Recipes that are not included in the catalogue can still be deployed. It is not
required to add your recipes to the catalogue, but this will improve the
visibility for other co-op hosters & end-users.
For now, it is best to [get in touch](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/intro/contact/) if you want to add your recipe to the catalogue.
In the future, we'd like to support [multiple catalogues](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/139).
## How do I configure backup/restore?
From the perspective of the recipe maintainer, backup/restore is just more
`deploy: ...` labels. Tools can read these labels and then perform the
backup/restore logic.
### Tools
Two of the current "blessed" options are
[`backup-bot-two`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/backup-bot-two) &
[`abra`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra).
#### `backup-bot-two`
Please see the [`README.md`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/backup-bot-two#backupbot-ii) for the full docs.
#### `abra`
`abra` will read labels and store backups in `~/.abra/backups/...`.
### Backup
For backup, here are the labels & some examples:
- `backupbot.backup=true`: turn on backup logic
- `backupbot.backup.pre-hook=mysqldump -u root -pghost ghost --tab /var/lib/foo`: command to run before backing up
- `backupbot.backup.post-hook=rm -rf /var/lib/mysql-files/*`: command to run after backing up
- `backupbot.backup.path=/var/lib/foo,/var/lib/bar`: paths to back up
You place these on your recipe configuration and then tools can run backups.
### Restore
Restore, in this context means, "moving a compressed archive back to the
container backup paths". So, if you set
`backupbot.backup.path=/var/lib/foo,/var/lib/bar` and you have a backed up
archive, tooling will unzip files in the archive back to those paths.
In the case of restoring database tables, you can use the `pre-hook` &
`post-hook` commands to run the insertion logic.
## Can I override a service within a recipe?
You can use [this `docker-compose` trick](https://docs.docker.com/compose/extends/#understanding-multiple-compose-files) to do this.
If you have a recipe that is using a `mysql` service and you'd like to use `postgresql` instead, you can create a `compose.psql.yml`!
An example of this is the [`selfoss`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/selfoss) recipe. The default is `sqlite` but there is a `postgresql` compose configuration there too.
## How do I set a custom entrypoint?
For more context, see the [`entrypoint.sh`](/maintainers/handbook/#entrypointsh) section. The following configuration example is ripped from the [`coop-cloud/peertube`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/peertube) recipe but shortened down. Here are more or less the steps you need to take:
Define a config:
```yaml
app:
...
configs:
- source: app_entrypoint
target: /docker-entrypoint.sh
mode: 0555
...
configs:
app_entrypoint:
name: ${STACK_NAME}_app_entrypoint_${APP_ENTRYPOINT_VERSION}
file: entrypoint.sh.tmpl
template_driver: golang
```
Define a `entrypoint.sh.tmpl`:
```
#!/bin/bash
set -e
file_env() {
local var="$1"
local fileVar="${var}_FILE"
local def="${2:-}"
if [ "${!var:-}" ] && [ "${!fileVar:-}" ]; then
echo >&2 "error: both $var and $fileVar are set (but are exclusive)"
exit 1
fi
local val="$def"
if [ "${!var:-}" ]; then
val="${!var}"
elif [ "${!fileVar:-}" ]; then
val="$(< "${!fileVar}")"
fi
export "$var"="$val"
unset "$fileVar"
}
file_env "PEERTUBE_DB_PASSWORD"
{{ if eq (env "PEERTUBE_SMTP_ENABLED") "1" }}
file_env "PEERTUBE_SMTP_PASSWORD"
{{ end }}
{{ if eq (env "PEERTUBE_LIVE_CHAT_ENABLED") "1" }}
apt -y update && apt install -y prosody && apt -y clean
mkdir -p /run/prosody && chown prosody:prosody /run/prosody
{{ end }}
# Copy the client files over to a named volume
# so that they may be served by nginx directly
cp -ar /app/client/dist /srv/client
# upstream entrypoint
# https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube/blob/66f77f63437c6774acbd72584a9839a7636ea167/support/docker/production/entrypoint.sh
/usr/local/bin/entrypoint.sh "$@"
```
Please note:
1. The `file_env` / `_FILE` hack is to pass secrets into the container runtime without exposing them in plaintext in the configuration. See [this entry](/maintainers/handbook/#exposing-secrets) for more.
1. In order to pass execution back to the original entrypoint, it's a good idea to find the original entrypoint script and run it from your own entrypoint script. If there is none, you may want to reference the `CMD` definition or if that isn't working, try to actually specify `cmd: ...` in the `compose.yml` definition (there are other recipes which do this).
1. If you're feeling reckless, you can also use the Golang templating engine to do things conditionally.
Then, wire up the vendored config version:
```
# abra.sh
export APP_ENTRYPOINT_VERSION=v5
```
You should be able to deploy this overriden configuration now.
## Linting rules
### R015: "long secret names"
Due to limitations placed by the Docker runtime, secret names must be < 64
characters long. Due to convetions in recipe configuration and how `abra`
works, several characters are appended to secret names during a deployment.
This means if you have a domain `example.org` and a secret `foo_pass`, you'll
end up with something like `example_org_foo_pass_v1` being used for the secret
name.
Based on a discussion in
[`#463`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/463) and
looking on what is implemented currently in existing recipes, we came up with a
general rule of thumb that secret names in recipe configurations should be < 12
characters long to avoid errors on deployment.
### R014: "invalid lightweight tag"
This is an issue related to the way Git/`go-git` handle Git tags internally. We
need to use "annotated tags" and not "lightweight tags" for our recipe versions
tags. Otherwise, `abra` has a hard time parsing what is going on.
The `R01O4` linting error happens because the recipe in question has a
lightweight tag. This needs to be replaced. This is a manual process. Here's a
practical example with the Gitea recipe when we had this issue.
You can validate what kind of tag is which by running the following:
```
git for-each-ref refs/tags
734045872a57d795cd54b1992a1753893a4934f1 tag refs/tags/1.0.0+1.14.5-rootless
b2cefa5ccf2f2f77dae54cf6c304cccecb3547ca tag refs/tags/1.1.0+1.15.0-rootless
6d669112d8caafcdcf4eb1485f2d6afdb54a8e30 tag refs/tags/1.1.1+1.15.3-rootless
64761ad187cc7a3984a37dd9abd4fa16979f97b9 tag refs/tags/1.1.2+1.15.6-rootless
1ccb1cb6a63a08eebf6ba5508b676eaaccba7ed8 tag refs/tags/1.1.3+1.15.10-rootless
b86e1f6dfef3c464b16736274b3cd95f8978f66b tag refs/tags/1.2.0+1.16.3-rootless
b1d22f3c39ca768a4efa1a0b9b9f780268c924b3 tag refs/tags/1.2.1+1.16.8-rootless
85a45aa749427822a73ef62b6362d57bae1a61af tag refs/tags/1.3.0+1.17.2-rootless
f35689989c0b57575b8362e1252476d8133dc961 commit refs/tags/1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless
df015fae592fca7728a3f0835217e110da4dbafc tag refs/tags/2.0.0+1.18.0-rootless
71920adb0c25a59f7678894e39f1a705f0ad08dd tag refs/tags/2.0.1+1.18.2-rootless
1ab9a96922341c8e54bdb6d60850630cce4b9587 tag refs/tags/2.1.0+1.18.5-rootless
1e612d84a2ad7c9beb7aa064701a520c7e91eecc commit refs/tags/2.1.2+1.19.3-rootless
0bee99615a8bbd534a66a315ee088af3124e054b tag refs/tags/2.2.0+1.19.3-rootless
699378f53501b2d5079fa62cc7f8e79930da7540 tag refs/tags/2.3.0+1.20.1-rootless
c0dc5f82930d875c0a6e29abc016b4f6a53b83dd tag refs/tags/2.3.1+1.20.1-rootless
```
Where `f35689989c0b57575b8362e1252476d8133dc961` &
`1e612d84a2ad7c9beb7aa064701a520c7e91eecc` need to be removed ("commit"). We
will deal with `refs/tags/1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless` in this example.
```
# find the tag hash
git show 1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless
commit f35689989c0b57575b8362e1252476d8133dc961 (tag: 1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless)
Merge: af97db8 1d4dc8e
Author: decentral1se <decentral1se@noreply.git.coopcloud.tech>
Date: Sun Nov 13 21:54:01 2022 +0000
Merge pull request 'Adding Oauth2 options and up on versions' (#29) from javielico/gitea:master into master
Reviewed-on: https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/gitea/pulls/29
# delete the tag locally / remotely
git tag -d 1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless
git push origin 1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless --delete
# re-tag, this time with `-a` (annotated)
git checkout f35689989c0b57575b8362e1252476d8133dc961
git tag -a 1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless
# push new tag
git checkout master # might be main on other recipes!
git push origin master --tags
# check everything works
git for-each-ref refs/tags | grep 1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless
964f1680000fbba6daa520aa8d533a53ad151ab8 tag refs/tags/1.3.1+1.17.3-rootless
```
That's it! Spread the word, use `-a` when tagging recipe versions manually! Or
just use `abra` which should handle this issue automagically for you in all
cases 🎉

View File

@ -1,23 +1,8 @@
---
title: Maintainers
title: Maintainers guide
---
Welcome to the maintainers guide! Maintainers are typically individuals who have a stake in building up and maintaining our digital configuration commons, the recipe configurations. Maintainers help keep recipes configurations up to date, respond to issues in a timely manner, help new users within the community and recruit new maintainers when possible.
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- __New Maintainers Tutorial__
If you want to package a recipe and/or become a maintainer, start here :rocket:
[Get Started](/maintainers/tutorial){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Packaging Handbook__
One-stop shop for all you need to know to package recipes :package:
[Read Handbook](/maintainers/handbook){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
</div>
Maintainers are encouraged to submit documentation patches! Sharing is caring :sparkling_heart:
- [New maintainers tutorial](/maintainers/tutorial): If you want to package a recipe and/or become a maintainer, start here :rocket:
- [Packaging handbook](/maintainers/handbook): One-stop shop for all you need to know to package recipes :package:

View File

@ -8,20 +8,18 @@ title: New maintainers tutorial
Packaging a recipe is basically knowing a bag of about 20 tricks. Once you learn them, there is nothing more to learn. It can seem daunting at first but it's simple and easy to do once you know the tricks.
The nice thing about packaging is that only one person has to do it and then we all benefit. We've seen that over time, the core of the configuration doesn't really change. New options and versions might come but the config remains quite stable. This is good since it means that your packaging work stays relevant and useful for other maintainers & operators as time goes on.
Depending on your familiarity with recipes, it might be worth reading [how a recipe is structured](/maintainers/handbook/#how-is-a-recipe-structured) and making clear you understand [what a recipe is](/glossary/#recipe) before continuing.
The nice thing about packaging is that only one person has to do it and then we all benefit. We've seen that over time, the core of the configuration doesn't really change. New options and versions might come but the config remains quite stable. This is good since it meand that your packaging work stays relevant and useful for other maintainers & operators as time goes on.
### Making a plan
The ideal scenario is when the upstream project provides both the packaged image and a compose configuration which we can build from. If you're in luck, you'll typically find a `Dockerfile` and a `docker-compose.yml` file in the root of the upstream Git repository for the app.
The idea scenario is when the upstream project provides both the packaged image and a compose configuration which we can build from. If you're in luck, you'll typically find a `Dockerfile` and a `docker-compose.yml` file in the root of the upstream Git repository for the app.
- **Tired**: Write your own image and compose file from scratch :sleeping:
- **Wired**: Use someone else's image (& maybe compose file) :smirk_cat:
- **Inspired**: Upstream image, someone else's compose file :exploding_head:
- **On fire**: Upstream image, upstream compose file :fire:
- **Tired**: Write your own image and compose file from scratch
- **Wired**: Use someone else's image (& maybe compose file)
- **Inspired**: Upstream image, someone else's compose file
- **On fire**: Upstream image, upstream compose file
### Writing / adapting the `compose.yml`
### Writing the `compose.yml`
Let's take a practical example, [Matomo web analytics](https://matomo.org/). We'll be making a Docker "swarm-mode" `compose.yml` file.
@ -43,9 +41,9 @@ wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/matomo-org/docker/master/.examples/apache
Open the `compose.yml` in your favourite editor and have a gander &#129442;. There are a few things we're looking for, but some immediate changes could be:
1. Let's bump the version to `3.8`, to make sure we can use all the latest swarm coolness.
2. We load environment variables separately via [`abra`](/abra/), so we'll strip out `env_file`.
3. The `/var/www/html` volume definition on L21 is a bit overzealous; it means a copy of Matomo will be stored separately per app instance, which is a waste of space in most cases. We'll narrow it down according to the documentation. The developers have been nice enough to suggest `logs` and `config` volumes instead, which is a decent start.
1. Let's bump the version to `3.8`, to make sure we can use all the latest swarm coolness
2. We load environment variables separately via [`abra`](/abra/), so we'll strip out `env_file`
3. The `/var/www/html` volume definition on L21 is a bit overzealous; it means a copy of Matomo will be stored separately per app instance, which is a waste of space in most cases. We'll narrow it down according to the documentation. The developers have been nice enough to suggest `logs` and `config` volumes instead, which is a decent start
4. The MySQL passwords are sent as variables which is fine for basic use, but if we replace them with Docker secrets we can keep them out of our env files if we want to publish those more widely.
5. The MariaDB service doesn't need to be exposed to the internet, so we can define an `internal` network for it to communicate with Matomo.
6. Lastly, we want to use `deploy.labels` and remove the `ports:` definition, to tell Traefik to forward requests to Matomo based on hostname and generate an SSL certificate.
@ -66,8 +64,8 @@ abra app new matomo --secrets \
--server swarm.example.com
```
Depending on whether you defined any extra environment variables -- we didn't so
far, in this example -- you might want to run `abra app config swarm.example.com`
Depending on whether you defined any extra environment variables, we didn't so
far, in this example, you might want to run `abra app config swarm.example.com`
to check the configuration.
Otherwise, or once you've done that, go ahead and deploy the app:
@ -80,4 +78,4 @@ Then, open the `DOMAIN` you configured (you might need to wait a while for Traef
### Finishing up
You've probably got more questions, check out the [packaging handbook](/maintainers/handbook)!
You've probably got more questions, check out the [maintainers handbook](/maintainers/handbook)!

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
title: Operators Handbook
title: Operations handbook
---
## Understanding `~/.abra`
@ -82,23 +82,11 @@ Then, tell your collaborators (e.g. in the repository's `README.md`), to run `ma
We don't currently recommend this, because it might set inaccurate expectations about the security model remember that, by default, **any user who can deploy apps to a Docker Swarm can manage _any_ app in that swarm**.
### Migrating a server into a repository
Even if you've got your existing server configs in version control, by default, `abra server add` will define the server locally. To move it -- taking the example of `newserver.example.com`:
```
mv ~/.abra/servers/newserver.example.com ~/coop-cloud-apps/
cd ~/coop-cloud-apps
git add newserver.example.com
git commit
make link
```
## Running abra server side
If you're on an environment where it's hard to run Docker, or command-line programs in general, you might want to install `abra` on a server instead of your local work station.
To install `abra` on the same server where you'll be hosting your apps, just follow [getting started guide](/operators/tutorial#deploy-your-first-app) as normal except for one difference. Instead of providing your SSH connection details when you run `abra server add ...`, just pass `--local`.
To install `abra` the same server where you'll be hosting your apps, just follow [getting started guide](/operators/tutorial#deploy-your-first-app) as normal except for one difference. Instead of providing your SSH connection details when you run `abra server add ...`, just pass `--local`.
```
abra server add --local
@ -116,7 +104,7 @@ Co-op Cloud uses [Docker Secrets](https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/secrets/)
`abra` includes several commands to make it easier to manage secrets:
- `abra app secret generate <domain>`: to auto-generate app secrets
- `abra app secret generate <domain>`: to auto-generate a app secrets
- `abra app secret insert <domain>`: to insert a single secret
- `abra app secret rm <domain>`: to remove secrets
@ -163,11 +151,11 @@ So, given how [secret versions](/operators/handbook/#secret-versions) work, here
1. Find out the current version number of the secret, e.g. by running `abra app config <domain>`, and choose a new one. Let's assume it's currently `v1`, so by convention the new secret will be `v2`
2. Generate or insert the new secret: `abra app secret generate <domain> db_password v2` or `abra app secret insert <domain> db_password v2 "foobar"`
3. Edit the app configuration to change which secret version the app will use: `abra app config <domain>`
4. Re-deploy the app with the new secret version: `abra app deploy <domain>`
4. Re-reploy the app with the new secret version: `abra app deploy <domain>`
### Storing secrets in `pass`
The Co-op Cloud authors use the [UNIX `pass` tool](https://www.passwordstore.org) to share sensitive data, including Co-op Cloud secrets, and `abra app secret ...` commands include a `--pass` option to automatically manage generated / inserted secrets:
The Co-op Cloud authors use the [UNIX `pass` tool][pass] to share sensitive data, including Co-op Cloud secrets, and `abra app secret ...` commands include a `--pass` option to automatically manage generated / inserted secrets:
```
# Store generated secrets in `pass`:
@ -191,275 +179,55 @@ This functionality currently relies on our specific `pass` storage conventions;
### Traefik networking
[Traefik](https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/) is our core web proxy, all traffic on a Co-op Cloud deployment goes through a running Traefik container. When setting up a new Co-op Cloud deployment, `abra` creates a "global" [overlay network](https://docs.docker.com/network/overlay/) which traefik is hooked up to. This is the network that other apps use to speak to traefik and get traffic routed to them. Not every service in every app is also included in this network and hence not internet-facing (by convention, we name this network `internal`, see more below).
[Traefik](https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/) is our core web proxy, all traffic on a Co-op Cloud deployment goes through a running Traefik container. When setting up a new Co-op Cloud delpyment, `abra` creates a "global" [overlay network](https://docs.docker.com/network/overlay/) which traefik is hooked up to. This is the network that other apps use to speak to traefik and get traffic routed to them. Not every service in every app is also included in this network and hence not internet-facing (by convention, we name this network `internal`, see more below).
### App networking
By convention, the main `app` service is wired up to the "global" traefik overlay network. This container is the one that should be publicy reachable on the internet. The other services in the app such as the database and caches should not be publicly reachable or visible to other apps on the same instance.
By convention, the main `app` service is wired up to the "global" traefik overlay network. This container is the one that should be publicy reachable on the internet. The other services in the app such as the database and caches should be not be publicly reachable or visible to other apps on the same instance.
To deal with this, we make an additional "internal" network for each app which is namespaced to that app. So, if you deploy a Wordpress instance called `my_wordpress_blog` then there will be a network called `my_wordpress_blog_internal` created. This allows all the services in an app to speak to each other but not be reachable on the public internet.
## Multiple apps on the same domain?
At time of writing (Jan 2022), we think there is a limitation in our design which doesn't support multiple apps sharing the same domain (e.g. `example.com/app1/` & `example.com/app2/`). `abra` treats each domain as unique and as the single reference for a single app.
At time of writing (Jan 2022), we think there is a limitation in our design which doesn't support multiple apps sharing the same domain (e.g. `example.com/app1/` & `example.com/app2/`). `abra` treats each domain as unique and as the singler reference for a single app.
This may be possible to overcome if someone really needs it, we encourage people to investigate. We've found that often there are limitations in the actual software which don't support this anyway and several of the current operators simply use a new domain per app.
This may be possible to overcome if someone really needs it, we encourage people to investigate. We've found that often, there are limitations in the actual software which don't support this anyway and several of the current operators simply use a new domain per app.
## How do I bootstrap a server for running Co-op Cloud apps?
## Validating `abra` binary checksums
The requirements are:
1. Docker installed
1. User in Docker user group
1. Swarm mode initialised
1. Proxy network created
!!! warning "You may need to log in/out"
When running `usermod ...`, you may need to (depending on your system) log
in and out again of your shell session to get the required permissions for
Docker.
```
# docker install convenience script
wget -O- https://get.docker.com | bash
# add user to docker group
usermod -aG docker $USER
# setup swarm
docker swarm init
docker network create -d overlay proxy
# on debian machines as of 2023-02-17
apt install apparmor
systemctl restart docker containerd
```
## How do I persist container logs after they go away?
This is a big topic but in general, if you're looking for something quick & easy, you can use the [journald logging driver](https://docs.docker.com/config/containers/logging/journald/). This will hook the container logs into systemd which can handle persistent log collection & managing log file size.
You need to add the following to your `/etc/docker/daemon.json` file on the server:
```json
{
"log-driver": "journald",
"log-opts": {
"labels":"com.docker.swarm.service.name"
}
}
```
And for log size management, edit `/etc/systemd/journald.conf`:
```
[Journal]
Storage=persistent
SystemMaxUse=5G
MaxFileSec=1month
```
Tne restart `docker` & `journald`:
```
systemctl restart docker
systemctl restart systemd-journald
```
Now when you use `docker service logs` or `abra app logs`, it will read from the systemd journald logger seamlessly! Some useful `journalctl` commands are as follows, if you're doing some more fine grained logs investigation:
- `journalctl -f`
- `journalctl CONTAINER_NAME=my_git_com_app.1.jxn9r85el63pdz42ykjnmh792 -f`
- `journalctl COM_DOCKER_SWARM_SERVICE_NAME=my_git_com_app --since="2020-09-18 13:00:00" --until="2020-09-18 13:01:00"`
- `journalctl CONTAINER_ID=$(docker ps -qf name=my_git_com_app) -f`
Also, for more system wide analysis stuff:
- `journalctl --disk-usage`
- `du -sh /var/log/journal/*`
- `man journalctl` / `man systemd-journald` / `man journald.conf`
## How do I specify a custom user/port for SSH connections with `abra`?
`abra` uses plain 'ol SSH under the hood and aims to make use of your existing SSH configurations in `~/.ssh/config` and interfaces with your running `ssh-agent` for password protected secret key files.
The `server add` command listed above assumes that that you make SSH connections on port 22 using your current username. If that is not the case, pass the new values as positional arguments. See `abra server add -h` for more on this.
You can download `abra` yourself from the [releases page](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/releases) along with the `checksums.txt` file.
```bash
abra server add <domain> <user> <port> -p
grep $(sha256sum abra_[version]_[platform]) checksums.txt > /dev/null && echo "checksum OK"
```
Running `server add` with `-d/--debug` should help you debug what is going on under the hood. It's best to take a moment to read [this troubleshooting entry](/abra/trouble/#ssh-connection-issues) if you're running into SSH connection issues with `abra`.
If "checksum OK" appears in your terminal - you're good to go!
## How do I attach to a running container?
Otherwise, you have downloaded a corrupted file.
If you need to run a command within a running container you can use `abra app run <domain> <service> <command>`. For example, you could run `abra app run cloud.lumbung.space app bash` to open a new bash terminal session inside your remote container.
## Creating a new server
## How do I attach on a non-running container?
`abra server new` can create servers if you have an account with a supported 3rd party integration. We currently support [Servers.coop](https://servers.coop) & [Hetzner](https://hetzner.com). The process of creating a new server usually goes like this:
If you need to run a command on a container that won't start (eg. the container is stuck in a restart loop) you can temporarily disable its default entrypoint by setting it in `compose.yml` to something like ['tail', '-f', '/dev/null'], then redeploy the stack (with `--force --chaos` so you don't need to commit), then [get into the now running container](#how-do-i-attach-to-a-running-container), do your business, and when done revert the compose.yml change and redeploy again.
1. Create an account with a server hosting provider
2. Generate an API client key which you'll give to `abra`
3. Run `abra server new` & fill in the values
## Can I run Co-op Cloud on ARM?
`abra` supports creating, listing and removing servers if the 3rd party integration supports it.
`@Mayel`:
If you want to teach `abra` how to support your favourite server hosting provider, we'd glady accept patches.
> FYI I've been running on ARM for a while with no troubles (as long as images
> used support it of course, `abra` doesn't work yet!) 😀 ... in cases where I
> couldn't find a multiarch image I simply have eg. image: ${DB_DOCKER_IMAGE}
> in the docker-compose and set that to a compatible image in the env config
> ... there was really nothing to it, apart from making sure to use multiarch
> or arm images
## Managing DNS entries
See [`#312`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/312) for more.
`abra record ...` can help you manage your DNS entries if you have an account with a supported 3rd party provider. We currently support [Gandi](https://gandi.net). The process of managing DNS with `abra` usually goes like this:
## How do I backup/restore my app?
1. Create an account with a DNS service provider
2. Generate an API client key which you'll give to `abra`
3. Run `abra record ls` to check everything works
If you're app [supports backup/restore](/maintainers/handbook/#how-do-i-configure-backuprestore) then you have two options: [`backup-bot-two`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/backup-bot-two) & [`abra`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra).
`abra` supports creating, listing and removing DNS entries if the 3rd party integration supports it.
With `abra`, you can simply run the commands:
```
$ abra app backup <domain>
$ abra app restore <domain>
```
Pass `-h` for more information on the specific flags & arguments.
If your app Recipe *does not support backups* you can do it manually with the
`abra cp` command. See the exact commands in [abra
cheetsheet](/abra/cheat-sheet/#manually-restoring-app-data).
## How do I take a manual database backup?
MySQL / MariaDB:
```
abra app run foo.bar.com db mysqldump -u root <database> | gzip > ~/.abra/backups/foo.bar.com_db_`date +%F`.sql.gz
```
Postgres:
```
abra app run foo.bar.com db pg_dump -u root <database> | gzip > ~/.abra/backups/foo.bar.com_db_`date +%F`.sql.gz
```
If you get errors about database access:
- Make sure you've specified the right database user (`root` above) and db name
- If you have a database password set, you might need to load it from a secret,
something like this:
```
abra app run foo.bar.com db bash -c 'mysqldump -u root -p"$(cat /run/secrets/db_oot_password)" <database>' | gzip > ~/.abra/backups/foo.bar.com_db_`date +%F`.sql.gz
```
## Can I deploy a recipe without `abra`?
Yes! It's a design goal to keep the recipes not dependent on `abra` or any
single tool that we develop. This means that the configuration commons can
still be useful beyond this project. You can deploy a recipe with standard
commands like so:
```
set -a
source example.com.env
cd ~/.abra/recipes/myrecipe
docker stack deploy -c compose.yml example_com
```
`abra` makes all of this more convenient.
## Proxying apps outside of Co-op Cloud with Traefik?
It's possible! It's actually always been possible but we just didn't have
spoons to investigate. Co-op Cloud can co-exist on the same server as bare
metal apps, non-swarm containers (plain `docker-compose up` deployments!),
Nginx installs etc. It's a bit gnarly with the networking but doable.
Enable the following in your Traefik `$domain.env` configuration:
```
FILE_PROVIDER_DIRECTORY_ENABLED=1
```
You must also have host mode networking enabled for Traefik:
```
COMPOSE_FILE="$COMPOSE_FILE:compose.host.yml"
```
And re-deploy your `traefik` app. You now have full control over the [file
provider](https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/providers/file/#directory)
configuration of Traefik. This also means you lost the defaults of the
`file-provider.yml.tmpl`, so this is a more involved approach.
The main change is that there is now a `/etc/traefik/file-providers` volume
being watched by Traefik for provider configurations. You can re-enable the
recipe defaults by copying the original over to the volume (this assumes you've
deployed `traefik` already without `FILE_PROVIDER_DIRECTORY_ENABLED`, which is
required for the following command):
```
abra app run $your-traefik app \
cp /etc/traefik/file-provider.yml /etc/traefik/file-providers/
```
You don't need to re-deploy Traefik, it should automatically pick this up.
You can route requests to a bare metal / non-docker service by making a
`/etc/traefik/file-providers/$YOUR-SERVICE.yml` and putting something like this in
it:
```yaml
http:
routers:
myservice:
rule: "Host(`my-service.example.com`)"
service: "myservice"
entryPoints:
- web-secure
tls:
certResolver: production
services:
myservice:
loadBalancer:
servers:
- url: "http://$YOUR-HOST-IP:8080/"
```
Where you should replace all instances of `myservice`.
You must use your host level IP address (replace `$YOUR-HOST-IP` in the
example). With host mode networking, your deployment can route out of the swarm
to the host.
If you're running a firewall (e.g. UFW) then it will likely block traffic from
the swarm to the host. You can typically add a specific UFW to route from the
swarm (typically, your `docker_gwbridge`) to the specific port of your bare
metal / non-docker app:
```
docker network inspect docker_gwbridge --format='{{( index .IPAM.Config 0).Gateway}}'
172.18.0.1
ufw allow from 172.18.0.0/16 proto tcp to any port $YOUR-APP-PORT
```
Notice that we turn `172.18.0.1` into `172.18.0.0/16`. It's advised to open the
firewall on a port by port case to avoid expanding your attack surface.
Traefik should handle the usual automagic HTTPS certificate generation and
route requests after. You're free to make as many `$whatever.yml` files in your
`/etc/traefik/file-providers` directory. It should Just Work ™
Please note that we have to hardcode `production` and `web-secure` which are
typically configurable when not using `FILE_PROVIDER_DIRECTORY_ENABLED`.
## Can I use Caddy instead of Traefik?
Yes, it's possible although currently Quite Experimental! See
[`#388`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/388) for more.
If you want to teach `abra` how to support your favourite server hosting provider, we'd glady accept patches.
## Running an offline coop-cloud server

View File

@ -1,23 +1,8 @@
---
title: Operators
title: Operators Guide
---
Welcome to the operators guide! Operators are typically individuals, members of tech co-ops or collectives who provide services powered by Co-op Cloud. This documentation is meant to help new & experienced operators manage their deployments as well as provide a space for sharing tricks & tips for keeping things running smoothly.
Welcome to the operators guide! Operators are typically individuals, members of tech co-ops or collectives who provide services powered by Co-op Cloud. This documentation is meant to help new & experienced operators manage their deployments as well as provide a space for sharing tricks & tips for keeping things running smoothly. Operators are encouraged to submit documentation patches! Sharing is caring :sparkling_heart:
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- __New Operators Tutorial__
If you want to become an operator, start your journey here :rocket:
[Get started](tutorial.md){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Operators Handbook__
One-stop shop for all you need to know to manage a deployment :ribbon:
[Read Handbook](handbook.md){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
</div>
Operators are encouraged to submit documentation patches! Sharing is caring :sparkling_heart:
- [New operators tutorial](/operators/tutorial): If you want to become an operator, start here :rocket:
- [Operations handbook](/operators/handbook): One-stop shop for all you need to know to manage a deployment :ribbon:

View File

@ -1,8 +1,83 @@
---
title: New Operators Tutorial
title: New operators tutorial
---
This tutorial assumes you understand the [frequently asked questions](/intro/faq/) as well as [the moving parts](/intro/strategy/) of the technical problems _Co-op Cloud_ solves. If yes, proceed :smile:
## The moving parts
Co-op Cloud is made up of a few simple, composable pieces. The system does not rely on any one specific implementation: each part may be replaced and/or extended as needed.
We want to build a resilient and long-term sustainable project and that means allowing for different implementations, open formats and a diverse project organisation.
Here are the main technical concepts listed below, once you [grok](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok) this, you grok the moving parts of the entire project. You can then move on to [deploying your first app](/operators/tutorial/#deploy-your-first-app).
### Libre software apps
Libre software apps are tools, websites & software clients that you may already use in your daily life: [Nextcloud], [Jitsi], [Mediawiki], [Rocket.chat] and [many more]!
These are tools that are created by volunteer communities who use [free software licenses] in order to build up the public software commons and offer more digital alternatives to [proprietary systems].
The communities who develop these softwares also publish them using [containers]. For example, here is the [Nextcloud hub.docker.com account] which allows end-users to quickly deploy a new Nextcloud instance.
There is a growing consensus in the free software community that containers are a useful and time saving format for distribution.
!!! question "Why did you choose to use containers?"
Learn more [in the FAQ section](/intro/faq/#why-containers).
[nextcloud]: https://nextcloud.com
[jitsi]: https://jitsi.org
[mediawiki]: https://mediawiki.org
[rocket.chat]: https://rocket.chat
[many more]: /recipes/
[free software licenses]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
[nextcloud hub.docker.com account]: https://hub.docker.com/_/nextcloud
[proprietary systems]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software
[containers]: https://www.docker.com/resources/what-container
### The recipe packaging format
However, just having a container of an app is often not enough. The work required to deploy that app in a "production ready" setup is still too time intensive and often involves a duplication of effort.
Each service provider needs to deal with the same problems: stable versioning, backup plan, secret management, upgrade plan, monitoring and the list goes on.
Individual free software projects can't take on all this responsibility. They provide the containers as is, in a secure and ready-to-go manner but it is up to service providers to worry about how the app is deployed.
Therefore, Co-op Cloud proposes a packaging format, which we refer to as a recipe, that describes the entire production state of the app in a single place. This format uses the existing [standards based compose specification].
This is a file format which is most commonly used by the [Docker compose] tool but Co-op Cloud **does not** require the use of Docker compose itself. Furthermore, as described below, we also don't rely on the actual Docker CLI itself either. We do however use a lot of the underlying libraries.
!!! question "Why did you choose to use the compose specificiation?"
Learn more [in the FAQ section](/intro/faq/#why-use-the-compose-specification).
[Each recipe] that Co-op cloud provides is described using the compose specification and makes use of the upstream project published container when possible (sometimes they don't publish one!).
This is the core of our approach to working with the ecosystem of free software communities. We want to maximise the chances of sharing work, knowledge and build solidarity through concrete co-operation.
[standards based compose specification]: https://compose-spec.io
[docker compose]: https://docs.docker.com/compose/
[each recipe]: /recipes/
### Container orchestrator
Once we have our app packaged as a recipe, we need a deployment environment (e.g. a server & something to keep the containers running). Production deployments are typically expected to support a number of features which give hosters and end-users guarantees for stability.
The Co-op cloud makes use of [Docker swarm] as a deployment environment. It offers an approriate feature set which allows us to support zero-down time upgrades, seamless app rollbacks, automatic deploy failure handling, scaling, hybrid cloud setups and maintain a decentralised design.
!!! question "Why did you choose to use Docker Swarm?"
Learn more [in the FAQ section](/intro/faq/#why-docker-swarm).
[docker swarm]: https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/
### Command-line tool
Finally, we need a tool to read the recipe package format and actually deploy the app. For this, we have developed and published the [abra] command-line tool.
`abra` aims at providing a simple command-line interface for managing your own Co-op Cloud. You can bootstrap machines with the required tools, create new apps and deploy them. `abra` is written in [Go](https://go.dev/) and uses a lot of the libraries that the `docker` and `docker-compose` CLIs use but does not rely on those interfaces directly.
`abra` is our flagship command-line client but it does not need to be the only client. `abra` was designed in such a way that is complements a workflow which can still be done completely manually. If Co-op Cloud goes away tomorrow, our configuration commons would still be useful and usable.
[abra]: /abra/
## Deploy your first app
@ -11,46 +86,23 @@ In order to deploy an app you need two things:
1. a server with SSH access and a public IP address
2. a domain name pointing to that server
This tutorial tries to help you make choices about which server and which DNS setup you need to run a _Co-op Cloud_ deployment but it does not go into great depth about how to set up a new server.
The tutorial tries to help you make choices about which server and which DNS setup you need to run a Co-op Cloud deployment but it does not go into great depth about how to set up a new server.
??? question "Can `abra` help automate this?"
!!! question "Can `abra` help automate this?"
Our `abra` tool can help bootstrap new servers & configure DNS records for
you. We'll skip that for now since we're just getting started. For more on
these topics after you finish the tutorial see the [operators
handbook](/operators/handbook).
`abra` can help bootstrap new servers & configure DNS records for you. We'll skip that for now since we're just getting started. See the [operators handbook](/operators/handbook) for more on these topics after you finish the tutorial.
### Server setup
Co-op Cloud has itself near zero system requirements. You only need to worry about the system resource usage of your apps and the overhead of running containers with the docker runtime (often negligible. If you want to know more, see [this FAQ entry](/intro/faq/#isnt-running-everything-in-containers-inefficient)).
Co-op Cloud has itself near zero system requirements. You only need to worry about the system resource usage of your apps and the overhead of running containers with the docker runtime (often negligible. If you want to know more, see [this FAQ entry](/faq/#isnt-running-everything-in-containers-inefficient)).
We will deploy a new Nextcloud instance in this guide, so you will only need 1GB of RAM according to [their documentation](https://docs.nextcloud.com/server/latest/admin_manual/installation/system_requirements.html). You may also be interested in this [FAQ entry](/intro/faq/#arent-containers-horrible-from-a-security-perspective) if you are curious about security in the context of containers.
We will deploy a new Nextcloud instance in this guide, so you will only need 1GB of RAM according to [their documentation](https://docs.nextcloud.com/server/latest/admin_manual/installation/system_requirements.html). You may also be interested in this [FAQ entry](/faq/#arent-containers-horrible-from-a-security-perspective) if you are curious about security in the context of containers.
Most Co-op Cloud deployments have been run on Debian machines so far. Some experiments have been done on single board computers & servers with low resource capacities.
You need to keep port `:80` and `:443` free on your server for web proxying to your apps. Typically, you don't need to keep any other ports free as the core web proxy ([Traefik](https://traefik.io)) keeps all app ports internal to its network. Sometimes however, you need to expose an app port when you need to use a transport which would perform better or more reliably without proxying.
`abra` has support for creating servers (`abra server new`) but that is a more advanced automation feature which is covered in the [handbook](/operators/handbook). For this tutorial, we'll focus on the basics. Assuming you've managed to create a testing VPS with some `$hosting_provider`, you'll need to install Docker, add your user to the Docker group & setup swarm mode:
!!! warning "You may need to log in/out"
When running `usermod ...`, you may need to (depending on your system) log
in and out again of your shell session to get the required permissions for
Docker.
```
# docker install convenience script
wget -O- https://get.docker.com | bash
# add user to docker group
sudo usermod -aG docker $USER
# setup swarm
docker swarm init
docker network create -d overlay proxy
```
??? question "Do you support multiple web proxies?"
!!! question "Do you support multiple web proxies?"
We do not know if it is feasible and convenient to set things up on an existing server with another web proxy which uses ports `:80` & `:443`. We'd happily receive reports and documentation on how to do this if you manage to set it up!
@ -65,128 +117,97 @@ Your entries in your DNS provider setup might look like the following.
Where `116.203.211.204` can be replaced with the IP address of your server.
??? question "How do I know my DNS is working?"
!!! question "How do I know my DNS is working?"
You can use a tool like `dig` on the command-line to check if your server has the necessary DNS records set up. Something like `dig +short <domain>` should show the IP address of your server if things are working.
### Install `abra`
### Command-line setup
Now we can install [`abra`](/abra) locally on your machine and hook it up to
your server. We support a script-based installation method ([script source](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/scripts/installer/installer)):
#### Install `abra`
Now we can install [`abra`](/abra) locally on your machine and hook it up to your server.
We support a script-based installation method (script source [here](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/src/branch/main/scripts/installer/installer)):
```bash
curl https://install.abra.coopcloud.tech | bash
```
The installer will verify the downloaded binary checksum. If you prefer, you can
[manually verify](/abra/install/#manual-verification) the binary, and then
manally place it in one the directories in your `$PATH` variable. To validate
that everything is working try listing the `--help` command or `-h` to view
output:
```bash
abra -h
```
You may need to add the `~/.local/bin/` directory to your `$PATH` variable, in
order to run the executable.
The installer will verify the downloaded binary checksum. You may need to add the `~/.local/bin/` directory with your `$PATH` in order to run the executable. You can validate that everything is in working order by listing the default help output:
```bash
export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin
abra -h # check it works
```
If you run into issues during installation, [please report a ticket](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/new) :pray: Once you're all set up, we **highly** recommend configuring command-line auto-completion for `abra`. See `abra autocomplete -h` for more on how to do this.
If you run into issues during installation, [please report a ticket](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/issues/new) :pray: Once you're all set up, we **highly** recommend configuring command-line auto-completion for `abra`. See `abra autocomplete -h` for more on how to do this.
??? question "Can I install `abra` on my server?"
!!! question "Can I install `abra` on my server?"
Yes, this is possible. However, the instructions for this setup are different. For more info see [this handbook entry](/operators/handbook/#running-abra-server-side).
Yes, this is possible, see [this handbook entry](/operators/handbook/#running-abra-server-side) for more. The instructions for setup are a little different however.
### Add your server
#### Add your server
Now you can connect `abra` with your server. You should have a working SSH configuration before you can do this (e.g. a matching `Host <server-domain>` entry in `~/.ssh/config` with the correct SSH connection details). That means you can run `ssh <server-domain>` on your command-line and everything Works :tm:.
Now you can connect `abra` with your server. You need to have a working SSH configuration before you can do this. That means you can run `ssh <server-domain>` on your command-line and everything Works :tm:.
```bash
ssh <server-domain> # make sure it works
abra server add <server-domain>
abra server add <server-domain> -p
```
!!! warning "Beware of SSH dragons"
`abra` uses plain 'ol SSH under the hood and aims to make use of your existing SSH configurations in `~/.ssh/config` and interfaces with your running `ssh-agent` for password protected secret key files.
The `server add` command listed above assumes that that you make SSH connections on port 22 using your current username. If that is not he case, pass the new values as positional arguments. See `abra server add -h` for more on this.
abra server add <domain> <user> <port> -p
Running `server add` with `-d/--debug` should help you debug what is going on under the hood. It's best to take a moment to read [this troubleshooting entry](/abra/trouble/#ssh-connection-issues) if you're running into SSH connection issues with `abra`.
The `-p` or `--provision` flag means that `abra` will install Docker and initialise the [new single-host swarm](https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/key-concepts/) on your server.
It is important to note that `<domain>` here is a publicy accessible domain name which points to your server IP address. `abra` does make sure this is the case and this is done to avoid issues with HTTPS certificate rate limiting.
You will now have a new `~/.abra/` folder on your local file system which stores all the configuration of your Co-op Cloud instance.
By now `abra` should have registered this server as managed. To confirm this run:
`abra` should now register this server as managed in your server listing:
```
abra server ls
```
??? warning "Beware of SSH dragons :dragon_face:"
!!! question "How do I share my configs in `~/.abra`?"
Under the hood `abra` uses plain 'ol `ssh` and aims to make use of your
existing SSH configurations in `~/.ssh/config` and interfaces with your
running `ssh-agent` for password protected secret key files.
Running `server add` with `-d` or `--debug` should help you debug what is going
on under the hood. If you're running into SSH connection issues with `abra`
take a moment to read [this troubleshooting
entry](/abra/trouble/#ssh-connection-issues).
??? question "How do I share my configs in `~/.abra`?"
It's possible and quite easy, for more see [this handbook entry](/operators/handbook/#understanding-app-and-server-configuration).
It's possible and quite easy, see [this handbook entry](/operators/handbook/#understanding-app-and-server-configuration) for more.
### Web proxy setup
In order to have your Co-op cloud deployment serve the public internet, we need to install the core web proxy, [Traefik](https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/).
Traefik is the main entrypoint for all web requests (e.g. like NGINX) and
supports automatic SSL certificate configuration and other quality-of-life
features which make deploying libre apps more enjoyable.
Traefik is the main entrypoint for all web requests (e.g. like NGINX) and supports automatic SSL certificate configuration and other quality-of-life features which make deploying libre apps more enjoyable.
**1. To get started, you'll need to create a new app:**
To get started, you'll need to create a new app:
```bash
abra app new traefik
```
Choose your newly registered server and specify a domain name. By default `abra`
will suggest `<app-name>.server.org` or prompt you with a list of servers.
**2. Configure this new `traefix` app**
Choose your newly registered server and specify a domain name.
You will want to take a look at your generated configuration and tweak the `LETS_ENCRYPT_EMAIL` value. You can do that by running `abra app config`:
```bash
abra app config <traefik-domain>
abra app config traefik
```
Every app you deploy will have one of these `.env` files, which contains
variables which will be injected into app configurations when deployed. These
files exist at relevantly named path:
Every app you deploy will have one of these `.env` files, which contains variables which will be injected into app configurations when deployed. Variables starting with `#` are optional, others are required.
```bash
~/.abra/servers/<domain>/<traefik-domain>.env
```
Variables starting with `#` are optional, others are required. Some things to
consider here is that by default our *Traefik* recipe exposes the metric
dashboard unauthenticated on the public internet at the URL `<traefik-domain>`
it is deployed to, which is not ideal. You can disable this with:
```
DASHBOARD_ENABLED=false
```
**3. Now it is time to deploy your app:**
Now it is time to deploy:
```
abra app deploy <traefik-domain>
```
Voila. Abracadabra :magic_wand: your first app is deployed :sparkles:
### Deploy Nextcloud
And now we can deploy apps. Let's create a new Nextcloud app.
@ -197,7 +218,7 @@ abra app new nextcloud -S
The `-S` or `--secrets` flag is used to generate secrets for the app: database connection password, root password and admin password.
??? warning "Beware of password dragons :dragon:"
!!! warning "Beware of password dragons"
Take care, these secrets are only shown once on the terminal so make sure to take note of them! `abra` makes use of the [Docker secrets](/operators/handbook/#managing-secret-data) mechanism to ship these secrets securely to the server and store them as encrypted data. Only the apps themselves have access to the values from here on, they're placed in `/run/secrets` on the container file system.
@ -217,45 +238,8 @@ abra app errors -w <nextcloud-domain> # error catcher
Your new `traefik` instance will detect that a new app is coming up and generate SSL certificates for it. You can see what `traefik` is up to using the same commands above but replacing `<netcloud-domain>` with the `<traefik-domain>` you chose earlier (`abra app ls` will remind you what domains you chose :grinning:).
### Upgrade Nextcloud
To upgrade an app manually to the newest available version run:
```bash
abra app upgrade <nextcloud-domain>
```
### Automatic Upgrades
`kadabra` the auto-updater is still under development, use it with care and don't use it in production environments. To setup the auto-updater copy the `kadabra` binary to the server and configure a cronjob for regular app upgrades. The following script will configure ssmtp for email notifications and setup a cronjob. This cronjob checks daily for new app versions, notifies if any kind of update is available and upgrades all apps to the latest patch/minor version.
```bash
apt install ssmtp
cat > /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf << EOF
mailhub=$MAIL_SERVER:587
hostname=$MAIL_DOMAIN
AuthUser=$USER
AuthPass=$PASSWORD
FromLineOverride=yes
UseSTARTTLS=yes
EOF
cat > /etc/cron.d/abra_updater << EOF
MAILTO=admin@example.com
MAILFROM=noreply@example.com
0 6 * * * root ~/kadabra notify --major
30 4 * * * root ~/kadabra upgrade --all
EOF
```
Add `ENABLE_AUTO_UPDATE=true` to the env config (`abra app config <app name>`) to enable the auto-updater for a specific app.
## Finishing up
Hopefully you got something running! Well done! The [operators handbook](/operators/handbook) would probably be the next place to go check out if you're looking for more help. Especially on topics of ongoing maintenance.
If not, please [get in touch](/intro/contact) or [raise a ticket](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/issues/new/choose) and we'll try to help out. We want our operator onboarding to be as smooth as possible, so we do appreciate any feedback we receive.
If not, please [get in touch](/intro/contact) or [raise a ticket](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra/issues/new) and we'll try to help out. We want our operator onboarding to be as smooth as possible, so we do appreciate any feedback we receive.

View File

@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
---
title: Culture of Solidarity (ECF)
---
> **TODO**

View File

@ -1,535 +0,0 @@
---
title: Ford foundation
---
# Ford foundation
> Status: **pending**
* [Previous material](https://notes.bonfire.cafe/nlnet-bonfire-coopcloud-hosting)
* [Application](https://fordfoundation.forms.fm/2023-digital-infrastructure-insights-fund-rfp/forms/9724)
## Is this concept note primarily focused on research or implementation?
- Implementation
## What is your research question? (30 words)
How can an open co-operative ecosystem foster a sustainable, resilient
infrastructure for FLOSS (Free/Libre Open Source software) development,
hosting, and tech support, while enhancing data ownnership, transparency and
co-operation?
## Why is this question important to answer and how does it relate to our fund? (500 words)
This is a challenge of paramount importance as it aims to design and test a
model for a sustainable, resilient open co-operative ecosystem amidst a digital
landscape overshadowed by large centralized profit-driven entities.
The hegemony of a few colossal platforms has led to myriad challenges
including, but not limited to, data privacy infringements, misinformation
dissemination, and a significant digital divide. Such challenges thwart the
internet's potential to act as a public commons and hinder the growth of a
democratic, open, and inclusive digital infrastructure.
The envisioned open co-operative ecosystem is a step towards remedying the
prevalent issues of centralization and lack of inclusivity in the digital
domain. It proposes a holistic approach encompassing technical innovation,
co-operative economics, and community-centric governance - where software,
infrastructure and communities are not isolated entities, but are part of a
common ecosystem.
This aligns profoundly with this fund's objective of exploring and remedying
the issues of under-maintenance and occasional undermining of FLOSS. The
proposed self-sustaining economic model is aimed at ensuring the longevity and
resilience of both the open co-operative ecosystem and all the actors involved:
FLOSS developers and designers, sysadmins and hosting providers, and all the
other figures that struggle to reach sustainability by working in and for the
FLOSS sector.
Furthermore, the proposed project is not merely a technical endeavor but a
multi-dimensional initiative aimed at fostering a digital infrastructure that
is equitable, sustainable, secure, and entrenched in the public interest.
Our proposed integration aims to simplify the setup, hosting and operating of
FLOSS software, through an open dashboard that automates the whole software
life cycle. This dashboard will act as a gateway to an ecosystem of developers
and hosting providers, which will work together to provide users and
communities with:
- Openness: Designers, developers, and sysadmins can join the ecosystem to
provide services and receive compensation;
- Mutualism: Projects and communities that meet specific criteria may exchange
services in-kind, or benefit from special rates;
- Flexibility: From a personal instance to a large community, the open
ecosystem will guide the user based on their specific needs and budget;
- Inclusivity: Users and communities can collectively shape the ecosystem's
roadmaps, by co-designing and funding desired features.
From the other side, the dashboard will also operate as an economic network to
track each contribution and distribute the available funds according to value
equation formulas as democratically defined by the ecosystem stakeholders.
## What research methods will you use to answer this question? (Please describe the methodologies and scope of your proposed research (500 words))
To comprehensively address the research question, a blend of interdisciplinary
methods will be employed to ensure a thorough analysis, development, and
evaluation of the proposed integrated Bonfire and Co-op Cloud ecosystem. The
methodologies are outlined as follows:
- Literature Review:
An extensive literature review will be conducted to gather insights on existing
models of open co-operative ecosystems, challenges and best practices in FLOSS
development, hosting, and funding, and the impact of decentralized digital
infrastructures on promoting inclusivity and co-operation.
- Surveys & Interviews:
By using mixed methods we aim to gather insights from relevant parties such as
instance administrators, app maintainers, and FOSS contributors.
- User-Centered Design (UCD):
Utilizing UCD principles, we will engage potential users and stakeholders in
the design and development process. This will include conducting surveys,
interviews, and usability testing to gather user requirements, preferences, and
feedback on prototype iterations.
- Technical Development and Prototyping:
The core of the research involves the technical development and prototyping of
the integrated dashboard that facilitates the setup, hosting, and operation of
custom Bonfire instances (the first FOSS application to be integrated in the
open dashboard). Agile development methodologies, including iterative design
and development cycles, will be employed to ensure a user-centric approach and
to allow for continuous feedback and improvement.
- Case Studies:
Detailed case studies of relevant initiatives will be conducted to glean
insights into best practices, challenges, and success factors. Comparative
analysis will help in understanding the potential impact and sustainability of
the proposed ecosystem. We already have communities willing to participate in
these case studies, that span from citizen science projects
(https://niboe.info), hacker spaces (https://www.facebook.com/Zer081),
bioregional communities (driftless area), and more...
- Economic Modeling:
Economic modeling will be employed to devise a transparent value equation for
revenue distribution among stakeholders. This will also involve exploring
sustainable funding models that ensure the longevity and resilience of the
proposed ecosystem. We will make use of the ValueFlows protocol to test several
value equations: https://www.valueflo.ws/algorithms/equations/
- Policy and Legal Analysis:
An examination of the policy and legal frameworks that could impact, or be
impacted by, the proposed ecosystem will be conducted. This includes analyzing
data privacy laws, open-source licensing, and cooperative economic regulations.
- Dissemination and Feedback:
Sharing the findings and prototypes with the broader community through various
channels including conferences, blog posts, social media, and project websites
for feedback and further refinement.
## What data or other resources will you use to answer the question? (500 words)
- Domain Experts and Stakeholder Interviews:
Insights from domain experts in FLOSS development, digital co-operatives,
hosting solutions, and decentralized digital infrastructures. Interviews with
stakeholders including developers, hosting providers, and potential users of
the proposed ecosystem.
- Economic Models and Financial Data:
Economic models pertinent to revenue distribution, funding, and sustainability
of open cooperative ecosystems. Financial data of similar initiatives to
understand their economic sustainability and impact.
- Legal and Policy Documents:
Legal documents, open-source licenses, and policy frameworks relevant to data
privacy, digital rights, and co-operative economic structures.
- Technical Documentation:
Technical documentation of Bonfire, Co-op Cloud, and other open-source projects
pertinent to the research. Documentation on protocols, standards, and best
practices in FLOSS development, hosting, and support.
- Open Source Software Repositories:
Access to open-source software repositories to study existing solutions,
libraries, and frameworks that could be leveraged for the technical development
of the proposed ecosystem.
- Prototyping Tools and Development Platforms:
Utilization of prototyping tools and development platforms for designing,
developing, and testing the integrated dashboard and associated features.
## If applicable: What is the research finding that you are moving into practice? (500 words)
The findings we are acting upon highlight the pressing necessity for a digital
ecosystem that prioritizes sustainability, decentralization, and cooperation
while advancing open-source software development, hosting, support, and
funding.
Existing research and case studies have highlighted the challenges posed by the
large centralized and profit-driven digital platforms, which often compromise
data privacy, inclusivity, and the democratic ethos of the digital realm.
Noteworthy findings from prior researches that underpin our project include:
- Co-operative Ecosystems:
Research on co-operative models -- notably "Proposal for a Cooperative Model
for Digital Infrastructure and Recommendations to Adopt It" by Tierra Comun in
2022 -- has revealed the potential for fostering sustainable and equitable
digital ecosystems. Co-operative structures, grounded in principles of
mutualism and collective governance, have shown promise in promoting economic
sustainability and community-centric development.
- Need for Decentralization:
Studies have underscored the benefits of decentralized digital infrastructures
in promoting data sovereignty, reducing censorship, and fostering innovation
through open standards and interoperability as well as ("Accounting and Billing
for Federated Cloud Infrastructures", Elmroth et al., 2009 Eighth International
Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing) the specific challenges in
tracking and distributing financial costs across these decentralized networks.
- Open Source as a Public Good:
The literature has extensively documented the value of FLOSS as a public good,
which can drive down costs, promote technical innovation, and foster a shared
digital commons.
- Challenges in FLOSS Sustainability:
Several reports (e.g. "Roads and Bridges: The Unseen Labor Behind Our Digital
Infrastructure", Nadia Eghbal, "The labor of maintaining and scaling free and
open-source software projects", Geiger et al, Proceedings of the ACM on
human-computer interaction 5.CSCW1, and "The coproduction of open source
software by volunteers and big tech firms", O'Neil et al., News and Media
Research Centre, 2021) have highlighted the challenges in sustaining open
source projects, often due to lack of funding, technical support, and a viable
economic model.
- User-Centric Design:
The importance of user-centric design in the development of digital platforms
to ensure accessibility, usability, and adoption has been well-documented.
- Community Engagement:
Engaging communities in design, development, and governance of platforms has
been found to promote inclusivity, trust, and long-term sustainability.
Moving these findings into practice, our proposal outlines a collaborative
endeavor between Bonfire and Co-op Cloud to develop an integrated open
dashboard that automates the setup, hosting, and operation of custom Bonfire
instances.
Practical implementations include:
- Developing a technical infrastructure that facilitates decentralized hosting
and operation of digital platforms, reducing reliance on centralized
entities.
- Establishing a co-operative economic model to ensure the financial
sustainability of the ecosystem, based on a transparent value equation for
revenue distribution among stakeholders.
- Engaging the community and potential users in the design and development
process to ensure the ecosystem meets their needs and preferences.
- Fostering a collaborative environment where developers, hosting providers,
and users can mutually benefit from the shared digital infrastructure.
- Implementing user-centric design principles to ensure the accessibility and
usability of the open dashboard, thus promoting broader adoption.
- Disseminating the developed prototypes and findings to the broader community
for feedback, further refinement, and adoption.
## What is the specific context / project / community that will be targeted with your research or its implementation - and why is it needed? (600 words)
RESEARCH (Phase 1):
A study on "Understanding the Open Infrastructure Ecosystem, with a Focus on
Federation," will set about comprehensively exploring practices and challenges
within the Federated ("Fediverse") and FOSS communities, It will investigate
co-design and development, documentation and onboarding, hosting,
configuration, maintenance, tech support, continuous integration, deployment
and upgrades, backups, community feedback and bug reporting, and governance.
This vital research addresses the centralization and monopolization of
platforms, barriers to entry, sustainability challenges, community empowerment,
knowledge sharing, and resilience and longevity of FOSS projects, to provide a
holistic understanding of the open infrastructure ecosystem.
We hope to identify common challenges faced by these communities, exploring
motivations for contributing or maintaining infrastructure, uncovering best
practices and potential solutions.
IMPLEMENTATION (Phase 2):
This above study will inform the development of a federated and cooperative
hosting ecosystem, helping to better align with the specific needs of instance
administrators, app maintainers and FOSS contributors. By initially focusing on
federated platforms and progresstively expanding to the broader ecosystem of
open infrastructure, the ecosystem can foster collaboration, enhance community
support, and contribute to the overall growth and sustainability of the
Fediverse and FOSS communities.
The implementation will start with Co-op Cloud, a software stack that
simplifies the hosting of FOSS applications, and Bonfire, a federated social
networking toolkit. These projects represent a microcosm of the broader open
source and cooperative ecosystem, and can serve as the initial building blocks
for user-friendly solutions and transparent, cooperative economic models,
ensuring accessibility and autonomy for all users.
This phase serves as a pragmatic step towards addressing identified needs, like
reducing technical barriers, fostering sustainability, and empowering
communities. It embodies a proactive shift towards a more decentralized,
cooperative, and equitable digital landscape, in response to the pressing
challenges and unmet needs within the FLOSS community and the broader digital
realm, and actively combats the issues of centralization, data control, and
sustainable revenue models, benefiting open source projects and communities
alike.
The integration of Bonfire and Co-op Cloud via a user-friendly dashboard will
significantly lower the technical barrier to entry, allowing a broader spectrum
of users to set up, host, and operate their own instances. Engaging their
communities, as well as the broader FLOSS community, in the design,
development, and governance of the proposed ecosystem to ensure it meets the
diverse needs and preferences of its stakeholders.
We'll also craft transparent value equations and economic models to foster a
sustainable, co-operative economic ecosystem where revenues are fairly
distributed among developers, hosting providers, and others.
DISSEMINATION (Phase 3):
Research findings will be compiled into a comprehensive report, offering
valuable insights to guide the evolution of the hosting ecosystem and
contribute to the knowledge base of open infrastructure practices and
challenges. This knowledge will be shared with the FOSS community and beyond,
promoting wider dialogue, feedback, and collaboration. This approach aligns
with the need for alternative economic models, transparency, and equitable
value distribution, and addresses the challenges of the current digital
landscape by advocating for decentralized, cooperative, and equitable
alternatives.
## Please summarize your proposed work and the key activities that you will undertake (500 words)
- Resarch study:
A study "Understanding the Open Infrastructure Ecosystem, with a Focus on
Federation" will be conducted as detailed above.
- Federation design & development:
We'll write an ecosystem federation proposal and resources to help others build
their own. A "start your federation cookbook" with analysis from a technical,
economic, legal, and governance perspective.
- Pilots:
We will work with several pilot users and organisations to provide feedback and
test our designs and solutions at every stage of the process. The various
pilots will help co-designing and test the open dashboard, by setupping custom
bonfire instances
- Capacity building and Architecture of Participation:
The capacity building activity will discover together with pilots and
participants how to draft a good governance and economic model to make all of
this work nicely.
- Protocol and platform integration:
Defining libre, reusable methods and systems for automatic DNS (across various
domain name registrars / DNS hosts) and server hosting provisioning (using e.g.
https://capsul.org), automated software installation and updates (using Co-op
Cloud's command-line tool Abra: https://docs.coopcloud.tech/abra/), backup and
data migrations (e.g. using http://tahoe-lafs.org/), user resource usage
measurement, payment integration, and dashboard UIs.
- Dissemination and communication:
This activity will focus on communicating with the world about our work, and
disseminate project outcomes and results through various channels, including
articles, conferences, social media, and project websites.
All the code produced will be documented, and publicly available with an open
source license. We will continue our outreach through our respective activity
on federated social media platforms including Bonfire itself, Mastodon,
Scuttlebutt, and Matrix.
## What partnerships and programs are critical to this work and how do you envision outreach activities? (400 words)
The proposed integration of Bonfire and Co-op Cloud is significantly enriched
by forming strategic partnerships with key entities in the open-source and
cooperative digital ecosystem. Here's how these partnerships are critical and
the envisioned outreach activities:
- Co-op Cloud Federation: partnership significance: Co-op Cloud Federation is
crucial for implementing the hosting and management of FOSS apps. This
partnership brings in vital technical expertise, hosting solutions, and the
potential for scaling the initiative across a federated network of service
providers. Outreach: Promoting the integrated solution through Co-op Cloud's
federated network, collaborating on joint marketing campaigns, and leveraging
the federation's channels to spread awareness and drive adoption.
- Bonfire Networks: partnership significance: Bonfire Networks provides the
foundational social networking toolkit that will be integrated with Co-op
Cloud. This partnership ensures technical synergy and collaborative
development, fostering an environment conducive to innovation and
user-centric design. Outreach: Engaging the existing community around Bonfire
Networks in workshops, webinars, and forums to introduce the integrated
solution, gather feedback, and foster active participation in its development
and utilization.
- Servers Co-op: partnership Significance: Servers.coop can play a key role as
a hosting provider within the ecosystem, offering reliable and cooperative
hosting solutions to users. Their involvement can help establish a network of
trustworthy hosting providers committed to cooperative principles. Outreach:
Joint campaigns promoting the benefits of cooperative hosting, showcasing
success stories, and educating communities on the advantages of
decentralized, cooperative digital infrastructures.
- Co-operative Computer: partnership Significance: Cooperative Computer can
provide valuable insights, technical expertise, and support in promoting
cooperative digital practices. This partnership can foster a shared learning
environment and potentially lead to collaborative projects enhancing the
integrated solution and actively participating in the open coop ecosystem.
Outreach: Hosting joint educational events, technical workshops, and online
discussions to explore cooperative computing models and their application in
the proposed ecosystem.
## What is your vision of success and what impact might it have? (400 words)
The vision of success for this initiative revolves around the establishment of
a self-sustaining, decentralized, and co-operative digital ecosystem that
significantly enhances the accessibility, usability, and economic
sustainability of FLOSS for all stakeholders.
The following are the key indicators of success and the potential impact of
this initiative:
- Ease of Access and Usability:
A successful implementation of the integrated dashboard that simplifies the
setup, hosting, and management of Bonfire instances, enabling a broader
spectrum of users, including those with limited technical skills, to leverage
FLOSS solutions effortlessly and in a trusted ecosystem.
- Economic Sustainability:
Establishment of a transparent and equitable economic model that ensures fair
revenue distribution among developers, hosting providers, and other
stakeholders, fostering financial sustainability and continued growth of the
Bonfire and Co-op Cloud ecosystems.
- Community Engagement and Governance:
Active engagement of the community in the decision-making processes,
development, and governance of the ecosystem, reflecting a vibrant,
participatory, and democratic digital co-operative environment.
- Increased Adoption and Experimentation:
A noticeable increase in the adoption of Bonfire and Co-op Cloud solutions,
alongside a proliferation of innovative projects and experiments emanating from
the co-operative ecosystem, contributing to a richer and more diverse digital
commons.
- Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration:
A thriving culture of knowledge sharing, collaborative development, and mutual
support within the ecosystem, facilitating continuous learning, innovation, and
problem-solving.
- Resilience and Longevity:
Demonstrated resilience of the co-operative digital ecosystem to evolving
economic, technical, and social challenges, ensuring its longevity and ongoing
relevance.
- Dissemination and Replication:
Effective dissemination of the insights, learnings, and models developed
through this initiative to the broader FLOSS community, encouraging replication
and adaptation of the co-operative model in other contexts.
In a broader sense, the success of this initiative could significantly
contribute to the reimagining and reshaping of the digital landscape in
alignment with the principles of openness, co-operation, and community-centric
development, echoing the core values and aspirations of the FLOSS community.
## Tell us more about the project team and collaborators (500 words)
The project is a multi-team effort between different stakeholders in the FLOSS
ecosystem. The project will be developed by a collaboration between two
projects: Bonfire and Co-op Cloud.
* Bonfire (https://bonfirenetworks.org) is an extensible open source federated
social networking toolkit, that empowers communities easily configure their
spaces from the ground up, according to a variety of needs and visions.
Bonfire envisions a web of independent but interconnected social networks
(using a wide definition, since we consider the social compoments of
activities in the economic, educational, and political spheres as well) -
able to speak and transfer information among each other, according to their
own boundaries and preferences.
* Co-op Cloud (https://coopcloud.tech/) is federation of democratic collectives
(including worker-owned co-operatives, an international radical art
collective, a labor union, and representatives from FLOSS software projects).
The federation is centred around a software stack that aims to make hosting
libre software applications simpler, aimed at organisations wanting to manage
their own infrastracture, as well as small service providers such as tech
co-operatives who are looking to standardise around an open, transparent and
scalable infrastructure -- but is also developing as community of practice
around these themes, beyond the specific technology stack.
## In which cost tier do you expect this work to sit?
- [ ] Between 50 and 75
- [ ] Between 75 and 100
- [x] Between 100 and 125
## How many months do you expect this work to take?
- 12 months
- more than 12 months (exception goes up to 18 months for part-time projects)
## Extras
### Research links
* https://apo.org.au/node/312607 - ONeil, Mathieu, et al. The coproduction of open source software by volunteers and big tech firms. News and Media Research Centre, 2021.
* https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449249 - Geiger, R. Stuart, Dorothy Howard, and Lilly Irani. "The labor of maintaining and scaling free and open-source software projects." Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 5.CSCW1 (2021): 1-28.
* https://www.fordfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/regional-foss-communities_final-report_ahossain-1.pdf - Hossain, Anushah. "Regional Open Source Software Communities: The View From Dhaka, Bangladesh." (2021).
* https://digitalinfrastructure.fund/projects/cooperative-model-for-digital-infrastructure/ - Tierra Comun, Mexico, 2022
* https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5279594 - E. Elmroth, F. G. Marquez, D. Henriksson and D. P. Ferrera, "Accounting and Billing for Federated Cloud Infrastructures," 2009 Eighth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, Lanzhou, China, 2009
* https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7523331 - K. Chard and K. Bubendorfer, "Co-Operative Resource Allocation: Building an Open Cloud Market Using Shared Infrastructure," in IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2019
* https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6253530 - F. Paraiso, N. Haderer, P. Merle, R. Rouvoy and L. Seinturier, "A Federated Multi-cloud PaaS Infrastructure," 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Cloud Computing, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2012
* https://www.proquest.com/openview/d0bb1812450db201b4b67c84eca8cc50/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y - Amini, Lisa D."Models and algorithms for resource management in distributed computing cooperatives,"Columbia University,2004
* https://hal.science/hal-03177060/document - Sébastien Broca, Laura Aufrère, Philippe Eynaud, Cynthia Srnec et Corinne Vercher-Chaptal, "Framasoft : de la plateforme à larchipel", 2021

View File

@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
---
title: Funding applications
---

View File

@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
---
title: Private funder
---
# Private funder
> Status: **accepted**
## Project Title
Co-op Cloud Federation & abra critical bug fixes
## Explain the project and its expected outcome(s).
We are requesting support to tackle two important tasks in Co-op Cloud, to improve the projects long-term sustainability:
* Formalising, and publicly launching the “Co-op Cloud Federation”,
* Fixing critical usability issues in abra which are hindering further adoption.
### The Federation
In April 2022, we announced our proposal for how the Co-op Cloud federation could function:
* [Public announcement blogpost](https://coopcloud.tech/blog/federation-proposal/)
* [Actual proposal text](https://pad.autonomic.zone/s/MLafJE2jC#)
Weve gathered feedback from community members and are ready to take the proposal forward. This period of feedback gathering went beyond our [ECF Culture of Solidarity funding timeline](https://culturalfoundation.eu/stories/culture-of-solidarity-fund/), so we are happy to receive support to finalise it now.
This will mean formalising our decision-making structure, clarifying membership in the federation and helping lay the foundations for economic self-sufficiency through agreed membership and user group fees.
We propose a series of meetings with active community members to achieve this.
### Critical abra bug fixes
We have identified a few bugs in theabra commandline tool that, once sorted, will greatly improve adoption of Co-op Cloud. This support will help us fix these bugs which takes us one step closer to a stable 1.0 release.
* Making abra resilient to outages in git.coopcloud.tech and the machine-readable `recipes.coopcloud.tech/recipes.json` (issue `#292`)
* Supporting language translations for the Co-op Cloud website and documentation (issue `coop-cloud/organising#74`)
* Bringing per-recipe documentation up-to-date with the latest abra syntax (issue `coop-cloud/organising#356`)
* Solidifying the machine-readable `recipes.coopcloud.tech/recipes.json` deployment (issue `coop-cloud/recipes-catalogue-json#3`)
* Making some usability tweaks to abras interface (issue `coop-cloud/organising#335` and issue `coop-cloud/organising#308)`
* Stabilising how abra interacts with SSH (issue `coop-cloud/organising#345`)
## Requested Amount
* 9,240 GBP
## Explain what the requested budget will be used for?
* Participation of all members at a series of meetings to discuss the proposal
* 60 GBP * 1 member from 8 member collectives * 6 hrs (3 meetings, 2 hr a meet) = 2880GBP
* Paying wages for 5 Autonomic members to collect feedback, amend the proposal & publish it
* 60 GBP * 5 members * 6 hrs = 1800GBP (collective meets)
* 60 GBP * 5 members * 4 hrs = 1200GBP (internal meets)
* 60 GBP * 1 member * 5 hrs = 300GBP (finance admin)
* Paying wages for 3 external contributors helping in the process (bug fix, writing, etc)
* 60 GBP * 3 members * 5 hrs = 900GBP
* Implementing the proposal: 3 months of admin time until which point we have enough members to support ongoing admin costs
* 60 GBP * 1 member * 2 hrs * 3 months = 360 GBP
* abra critical usability fixes
* 60 GBP * 2 members * 15 hrs = 1800 GBP
## What are significant challenges you expect to face?
Designing and settling on a format for the federation will be our main challenge. We expect that working together within a diversity of co-operatives and group members will present a spectrum of opinions on how the federation ought to function. Finding common ground amongst ourselves may pose a challenge. Finding a sufficient number of members for a functioning federation may be difficult.
While we all have a lot of experience with group decision-making through our involvement in Autonomic and other multi-stakeholder co-operatives, it could be a challenge to settle on a decision making system.
# Describe the ecosystem of the project, and how you will engage with relevant actors and promote the outcomes?
Several collectives are using Co-op Cloud as their preferred hosting method for example [Bonfire](https://bonfirenetworks.org/) and [Local-IT](https://local-it.org/) (see "Co-op Cloud “The Organisation”" on [The Co-op Cloud Public Beta](https://coopcloud.tech/blog/beta-release/) for the full list of participants).
We have over 500 followers on [Mastodon](https://social.coop/@coopcloud/), but our primary communication and recruitment relies on word of mouth, and people inviting each other to our Matrix channel. The community members have already [written](https://cgalo.dev/pages/from-coop-cloud-to-plain-docker-swarm/) [articles](https://gnulinux.ch/selfhosting-mit-co-op-cloud-und-abra) about Co-op Cloud and we expect this to happen again.

View File

@ -1,105 +0,0 @@
---
title: Sovereign Tech Fund
---
# Sovereign Tech Fund
> Status: **rejected**
## Project title
Critical fixes & enhancements for Abra, the Co-op Cloud command-line interface
## Describe your project in a sentence.
Abra is the flagship command-line interface for Co-op Cloud, built to support the day-to-day workflow of deployment operators and recipe (app configuration) maintainers.
## Describe your project more in-depth. Why is it critical?
The core technical work of the Co-op Cloud project involves democratic tech collectives hosting open source apps on self-managed servers. These apps empower digital sovereignty for members of our own collectives, and the wider community of partners, allies and clients for whom we operate these privacy-preserving, commons-based services. This is vital at a time of increasing surveillance predation and centralisation by "Big Tech" firms including widespread regulatory capture but also as public awareness of these issues grows, to facilitate concrete and meaningful action.
Day-to-day operation of Co-op Cloud uses the "Abra"command-line interface to interact with the app packaging & maintenance ecosystem, run app deployments and support long-term app maintenance (backup, restore, monitoring, etc.).
Since the Beta launch of Co-op Cloud in May 2022, we've formed a federation with 10 founding members, 2 of which run large-scale deployments (100+ apps in production) managed using Abra. Each open source app requires maintaining a shared app configuration ("recipe") using Abra, collectivising the federation members' experience into the digital commons.
Abra is a critical infrastructural resource because operators and recipe maintainers rely on it to do their work, share their work and operate and maintain their Co-op Cloud deployments and recipes. Abra is increasingly being relied upon for daily operations by more democratic tech collectives as the Co-op Cloud project scales up membership.
## Link to project repository
[`git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra`](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/abra)
## Link to project website
[`coopcloud.tech`](https://coopcloud.tech)
## Please provide a brief overview over your projects own dependencies.
The design of Abra is based on the idea of wrapping existing APIs and interfaces to provide a more convenient and efficient workflow for operators and maintainers. In this way, Abra relies directly on integrations with core Linux tooling such as Docker, Git and SSH.
Abra relies primarily on interacting with the Docker Engine APIs using the Go programming language, in order to interact and control container runtimes on the self-managed servers. Abra speaks directly to the Docker daemon on the server using those APIs. Abra also relies on several non-public APIs from Docker and Mobdy related packages.
Abra provides [library APIs for clients](https://pkg.go.dev/coopcloud.tech/abra) which are currently available for experimental use. Tools such as [Kadabra](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/operators/tutorial/#automatic-upgrades) consume the Abra API in order to provide server-side automation, e.g. automatic upgrades. Furthermore, [cctuip](https://git.coopcloud.tech/decentral1se/cctuip), a prototype text-based user interface for operators also consumes the Abra APIs.
Both Kadabra and cctuip are being developed by members of the Co-op Cloud federation. Both tools are actively being used, tested and developed within the context of production deployments.
Abra relies on self-hosted Gitea (code hosting) & Drone (continuous integration / continuous deployment) systems to provide binary builds and release automation.
Operators and maintainers who rely on Abra for daily operations are as follows:
- [Autonomic co-operative](https://autonomic.zone)
- [Local-IT](https://local-it.org/)
- [Solisoft](https://solisoft.top)
- [Flancia](https://flancia.org/)
- [Social.coop](https://social.coop)
- [Bonfire](https://bonfirenetworks.org/)
- [ruangrupa](https://documenta-fifteen.de/en/lumbung-space/)
- [UTAW](https://utaw.tech/about/)
- [Kotec co-operative](https://kotec.space/)
## Which target groups does your project address (who are its users?) and how do they benefit from the funding (directly and indirectly)?
The intended public of the Co-op Cloud project are established democratic tech collectives, such as technology co-operatives, who are already involved in public service providing. This focus allows us to situate our work within the specific requirements of this community, of which we are also a member.
Collectives would immediately benefit from the funding of critical fixes and enhancements in Abra: the fixes and enhancements listed in this proposal are generated through our bug reports, discussions and proposals for change. Receiving funding to proceed with this work will bring the exact changes required to improve the day-to-day operations and maintenance of the Co-op Cloud technical community.
Collectives face issues of scale when trying to achieve financial sustainability. As a consequence of Big Tech, end-users are accustomed to receive services for free or at very little charge. Small service providers need to scale out usership to make ends meet, which brings the risk of becoming overwhelmed with maintenance tasks, e.g. responsibility to backup data correctly across several apps/servers/groups.
Tools such as Abra play a key role in reducing the maintenance burden and expanding collaboration within the responsible collectives, because it is designed to do so by the community itself. In this sense, an improved and stable Abra increases the chances that end-users receive a stable and reliable service, which in turn helps with further outreach to grow the number of users benefiting from privacy-preserving, user-friendly, and community-directed software systems.
## How was the work on the project made possible so far (structurally, financially, including volunteer work)? If applicable, list others sources of funding that you applied for and/or received.
Co-op Cloud, including Abra, was initiated by members of [Autonomic Co-operative](https://autonomic.zone/blog/2021/03/the-co-operative-cloud/) initially on a volunteer basis, and then financially compensated from Autonomic's revenue once Abra reached an initial alpha release, including nominal back-pay for the volunteer work.
Shortly afterwards, Co-op Cloud received 32,986 EUR in funding from the [European Cultural Foundation](https://culturalfoundation.eu/stories/cosround4-autonomic-co-operative) to bring the project to public beta, and more widespread adoption by tech collectives. Autonomic Co-operative, who applied for the funding and continued to manage Co-op Cloud & Abra development during this period, helped distribute this funding to community members, to help avoid the frequent reliance of commons technology projects on volunteer labour.
Following the public beta launch, the project received 10,000 GBP in funding from a private donor to support the launch of the Co-op Cloud Federation, a nascent multi-stakeholder co-operative modelled after the [CoopCycle model](https://coopcycle.org/en/federation/).
We also applied for the [NLNet User-Operated Internet Fund](https://nlnet.nl/useroperated/) for funding to work on an web-based operator interface but were unsuccesful.
Currently, the project's main sources of funding is the membership dues of 10 federation members who pay 10 GBP / month to the federation common fund, and the ~5000 EUR left over from the private donation.
## What do you plan to implement with the support from STF?
The Co-op Cloud project is reaching a point where a significant number of democratic tech collectives rely on Abra for daily operations of their large scale production deployments.
This brings new technical challenges in two directions.
The first is handling the increase in bug reports. The challenge here is the increasing scale, diversity and collective triage and discussion required to fix the bugs. We're seeing that these new fixes must be nuanced in their implementation and aware of diverse needs of operators/maintainers. This can often result in democratic decision-making to achieve consensus on a fix that is agreeable to those involved.
The second is a new challenge in which we must implement larger scale enhancements in Abra. We're seeing changing workflows, new approaches to deployments and discussion which result in proposals for significant changes in Abra. These changes often risk major disruption in workflows, e.g. for the app maintainer ecosystem and require a period of consensus building and democratic decision making around a proposal. Furthermore, the deployment of these changes typically require a pre-release and early adopter testing phase before rolling them out fully in a new release of Abra.
We currently categorise these two development trajectories under the following project boards:
* [Critical fixes (15 tickets at time of writing)](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/projects/24)
* [Medium/large enhancements (15 tickets at time of writing)](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/organising/projects/25)
Abra has proven itself as a resilient toolset over 3 years of development and adoption. However, with the increase in scope of fixes and proposals for large scale changes, is at risk of falling behind and at worst, becoming an obstacle to day-to-day operations as the ecosystem of open source infrastructure management continues to change.
With the support of STF we can ensure the continued resilience of the project by implementing the fixes and changes generated by the Co-op Cloud community of operators and maintainers.
## Who (maintainer, contributor, organization) would be most qualified to implement this work/receive the support and why?
Abra currently has 7 maintainers who work infrequently on Abra alongside their existing responsibilities in their own tech collectives. 2 of these developers have been involved in the first implementation of Abra, including the original Bash implementation. 4 tech collectives are represented in this development team.
We believe we have the expertise within the existing maintenance team to carry out the proposed changes in Abra. In our estimations, we expect that 2 developers can engage significantly in Abra development on a more dedicated basis over the course of 8 months.

View File

@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
---
title: User-Operated Internet Fund
---
# User-Operated Internet Fund
> Status: **rejected** ([Link to open call](https://nlnet.nl/useroperated/))
## Questions
> Please be short and to the point in your answers; focus primarily on the what and how, not so much on the why. Add longer descriptions as attachments (see below). If English isn't your first language, don't worry - our reviewers don't care about spelling errors, only about great ideas. We apologise for the inconvenience of having to submit in English. On the up side, you can be as technical as you need to be (but you don't have to). Do stay concrete. Use plain text in your reply only, if you need any HTML to make your point please include this as attachment.
### 1. Abstract: Can you explain the whole project and its expected outcome(s). (1200 chars)
We're seeking financial support to build a web interface for [The Co-operative Cloud](https://coopcloud.tech), an open platform for public interest infrastructure. This will allow us to accelerate our plans to bring Co-op Cloud to end users, expanding the model from community hosting to self-hosting.
The command-line version of Co-op Cloud is already helping empower democratic collectives to run their own applications securely and reliably -- from file-sharing to broadcasting to real-time chat. We released the CLI in alpha form in March 2021, and we're currently working towards a beta release in November 2022.
Our current plan is to develop a web interface within the next 3-5 years, using income from providing managed Co-op Cloud hosting, to remove the requirement to be familiar with a shell prompt, and provide an open version of the "one click apps" available with some corporate providers.
### 2. Have you been involved with projects or organisations relevant to this project before? And if so, can you tell us a bit about your contributions? (??)
We have participated in the [Yunohost](https://yunohost.org) and [Librehosters](https://libreho.st) projects, which aim to address some of the same challenges as Co-op Cloud, and our experiences with those organisations informed our design. More broadly than those very similar projects, we have also contributed to libre software applications like Discourse, Drupal and Peertube, and we're helping with community stewardship of the Mailu libre email project.
### 3. Requested Amount (5000 to 50,000 EUR)
46,000
### 3A. Explain what the requested budget will be used for?
- Brand design, UI research & design: 10%
- UX testing: 5%
- Software architecture and implementation: 40%
- Project management: 10%
- Community engagement & outreach: 5%
- Security audit & bug bounties: 20%
- Language translations: 10%
### 3B. Does the project have other funding sources, both past and present?
We are currently receiving funding from the European Culture of Solidarity Foundation under the "Infodemic" call, to build the beta version of the Co-op Cloud platform, €31,000 in total from July 2021 - November 2022.
Beyond our grant funding, and support in terms of time and technical resources from Autonomic Co-operative, Co-op Cloud is also supported by 11 co-funding partner organisations who are now running some or all of their technology infrastructure using the platform: [ruangrupa](https://ruangrupa.id) -- curators of the upcoming ["documenta fifteen" event](https://www.documenta.de/en/documenta-fifteen/#) -- [WASHNote](https://washnote.com), [Social Media Analysis Toolkit (SMAT)](https://www.smat-app.com), [Neuronic Games](https://www.neuronicgames.com), [Third Sector Accountancy](https://www.thirdsectoraccountancy.coop), [Biobulkbende](https://biobulkbende.org), [Anarchy Rules](https://anarchyrules.info), [Fashion Revolution](https://fashionrevolution.org), the [Industrial Workers of the World](https://iww.org.uk), [Shaping Our Lives](https://www.shapingourlives.org.uk/) and [United Tech and Allied Workers](https://utaw.tech).
### 4. Compare your own project with existing or historical efforts. (eg what is new, more thorough, or otherwise different)
We maintain an ongoing analysis of Co-op Cloud compared to other options in the [Co-op Cloud documentation](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/faq/#what-about-alternative).
Overall, Co-op Cloud has architectural and organisational advantages over existing libre options like Yunohost and [Caprover](https://caprover.com), and our open governance and libre licencing make Co-op Cloud a better long-term, pro-social choice than proprietary platforms like [Cloudron](https://cloudron.io). Versus options like [Ansible](https://ansible.com) or [Kubernetes](https://kubernetes.io), Co-op Cloud aims to be usable by less-technical users, to reduce their reliance on third parties to manage their data and tools.
### 5. What are significant technical challenges you expect to solve during the project, if any?
The main challenge that we aim to overcome in building this web application is making some of the complex concepts around self-hosting accessibile to non-technical users, simplifying and automating DNS, backups, application updates, and updates of the Co-op Cloud web application itself.
A key secondary technical challenge will be ensuring up-to-date, high-quality translations, which we plan to achieve by closely integrating Weblate with our code and documentation management systems.
Another goal is to ensure the web application is resource-efficient, while remaining delightful to use, to maximise the range of hardware that it can be used on.
Lastly, we hope to continue the project of user education around the concept of data sovereignty, as well as provide the technical tools to help people migrate away from, and stay away from, big-tech surveillance.
In terms of technical risks in the project, we see:
- security (mitigated by an in-depth security review before launch, and the going bug bounty program)
- configuration management (mitigated by using the existing git-based configuration management system from Co-op Cloud's command-line interface)
- support (mitigated by continuing to grow the Co-op Cloud community, to maximise the opportunity for peer assistance)
### 6. Describe the ecosystem of the project, and how you will engage with relevant actors and promote the outcomes? (Eg which actors will you involve? Who should deploy or run your solution to make it a success?)
We plan to build on our existing, successful, outreach strategy throughout our networks. We will make use of:
.. forums such as [CoTech](https://community.coops.tech, 581 members) and [International Co-operative Alliance](https://patio.ica.coop, 250 members) to make the project visible for technology co-operatives. Estimated 861 technology co-operative members, representing over 100 different co-operatives.
.. the [CHATONS](https://chatons.org, 70 members) and [Librehosters](https://libreho.st, 21 members) networks to maximise our reach amongst democratic technology collectives based in Europe. Estimated 91 collectives.
.. Cyberia Computer Club, an international network with whom we've already collaborated on integrations between their software and Co-op Cloud. Approximately 260 people.
.. both [traditional](https://twitter.com/autonomiccoop, 220 followers) and [alternative social media](https://sunbeam.city/@autonomic, 119 followers) to reach open source developers and other wider comunity members. Estimated 339 followers.
.. our own [co-operative website](https://autonomic.zone), which is visited by a wide range of potential clients, partners, and members. Estimated 1,000 visitors / month.
.. our self-hosted Matrix channel for [Co-op Cloud](#coop-cloud:autonomic.zone). 44 members (and growing), including representatives of some international organisations.
.. our personal relationships with democratic technologists internationally, including in Pakistan, India, Brazil, Canada, Spain, the USA, and others. Estimated ~50 unique contacts.
Our goal would be to see at least 3 other democratic collectives, from anywhere within these networks, using Co-op Cloud by the time of the launch of the beta web application, and to see a further 20 people join our Matrix chat as individual users. We also hope to see at least one strategic alliance with an initiative like Freedombox, or Cyberia's Greenhouse, to integrate Co-op Cloud with other efforts to improve the self-hosting landscape.
### Attachments
Attachments: add any additional information about the project that may help us to gain more insight into the proposed effort, for instance a more detailed task description, a justification of costs or relevant endorsements. Attachments should only contain background information, please make sure that the proposal without attachments is self-contained and concise. Don't waste too much time on this. Really.
We have attached a budget document.

View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: Organising handbook
## Where do I find "the community"?
The main place is the [Matrix community chat channels](/intro/contact/#matrix). You'll find a number of folks who are actively interested in the project and/or using `abra` and some of our recipes. Furthermore, Matrix has an excellent network of Cool People :tm: and in practice we've e-met a lot of groups who are interested in Co-op Cloud.
The main place is the [Matrix community chat channels](/intro/contact/#matrix). You'll find a number of folks who are actively interested in the project and/or using `abra` and some of our recipes. Furthermore, Matrix has an excellent network of folks and in practice we've e-met a lot of groups who are interested in Co-op Cloud.
## Onboarding new project members
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ We still haven't worked this out. We're working on it.
## Gathering new case studies
We try to gather as many "case studies" as possible, stories & concrete examples of Co-op Cloud being used For Good :tm: See [coopcloud.tech](https://coopcloud.tech) for our existing examples. These studies help people identify what the purpose of the project is.
We try to gather as many "case studies" as possible, stories & concrete examples of Co-op Cloud being used For God :tm: See [coopcloud.tech](https://coopcloud.tech) for our existing examples. These studies help people identify what the purpose of the project is for.
## Monthly updates

View File

@ -1,23 +1,9 @@
---
title: Organisers
title: Organisers Guide
---
Welcome to the organisers guide! Organisers are folks who focus on the social work in the project. Speaking for the project at talks, helping new tech co-ops & collectives join, keeping an eye out for funding opportunities, seeing what things come up in the community chats, etc. It's important work.
<div class="grid cards" markdown>
- __Organisers Handbook__
One-stop shop for all you need to know to organise in the community :sparkles:
[Read Handbook](/organisers/handbook){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
- __Say Hello First__
If you like what you see, but are not sure how to best contribute :speech_left:
[Get In Touch](/get-involved/){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
</div>
Welcome to the organisers guide! Organisers are folks who focus on the social work in the project. Speaking for the project at talks, helping new tech co-ops & collectives join, keeping an eye out for funding opportunities, seeing what things up come up in the community chats, etc. It's important work.
We're still working out what it looks like to do this kind of work in the project. If you like the idea of this kinda of work and/or are already doing it, please send patches to improve this documentation :rocket:
- [Organising handbook](/organisers/handbook): One-stop shop for all you need to know to organise in the community :sparkles:

View File

@ -1,243 +0,0 @@
---
title: The Co-op Cloud Federation Proposal
---
# The Co-op Cloud Federation Proposal
## Table of Contents
- [Goal](#Goal)
- [Overview](#Overview)
- [Process](#Process)
- [The Federation Proposal](#The-Federation-Proposal)
- [The Code of Co-operation Proposal](#The-Code-of-Co-operation-Proposal)
## Goal
This document is for the folks who are curious about what is means to "join the Co-op Cloud". You may already be lurking the Matrix channels, have deployed some apps with `abra` or support the project and want it to succeed :heart:
If this is the first time you're seeing the project, please do take a look at [coopcloud.tech](https://coopcloud.tech) & maybe [docs.coopcloud.tech](https://docs.coopcloud.tech) for more of a technical deep dive. You're also more than welcome to join the project!
## Overview
As part of the [beta bikemap goals](https://pad.autonomic.zone/s/C3uuqfSCk) we are aiming to formalise the idea of what ["Co-op Cloud 'The Organisation'"](https://pad.autonomic.zone/s/C3uuqfSCk#Co-op-Cloud-%E2%80%9CThe-Organisation%E2%80%9D) could mean concretely. Here is what we wrote in our bike map originally:
> One of the core goals of Co-op Cloud is to have the project run and managed by a diverse group of tech co-ops and collectives who are invested into building, maintaining and extending this digital configuraton commons. In order to open the project up we need to work on shared governance guidelines, codes of conduct, building community trust and working towards economic sustainability.
Now that we are reaching the moment where we can make the beta release, we are ready to publish this proposal for feedback, discussion & amendments.
## Process
In terms of feedback, we don't think we have to figure it all out now. What is more important is to lay the foundations for democratically working it out as we go on. Any red flags, major concerns & blockers to participation would be great to discover at this early stage. All comments, feedback & constructive criticism is welcome!
We are happy to receive this on any of the communication channels that we have. Please see our [contact docs](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/intro/contact/) for more. We will gather all feedback, discussions & follow up with people by the end of April 2022. We are aiming to publish this proposal by mid May 2022.
---
## The Federation Proposal
### Members
Co-op Cloud is a federation of co-operative hosters centred around the [Co-op Cloud project](https://coopcloud.tech). By Co-operative hosters, we mean worker- or user-owned co-operatives, or other democratic collectives who are operating in the public interest.
### Vision
A world where it's much easier to host technology services, creating local, community-run and participatory tech hosters, enabling more and more people to use services provided in the public interest, instead of ones operated by predatory advertising or planned obsolescence companies.
### Aims
1. Develop the Co-op Cloud technical app platform, including the [abra](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/abra/) command-line tool, the [application recipe catalogue](https://recipes.coopcloud.tech), and the [documentation](https://docs.coopcloud.tech).
1. Maintain a community of mutual support between co-operative hosters.
1. Facilitate communication between users and developers of libre software.
1. Create a support and knowledge sharing network to make setting up new co-operatives easier.
### Benefits
As a member of Co-op Cloud, you'll be able to:
- Participate in decision-making -- about the direction of Co-op Cloud, and how to distribute income from grants and donations.
- Get listed as a recommended service provider [on the Co-op Cloud website](https://coopcloud.tech).
- Receive announcements about opportunities for funded work on Co-op Cloud early, before they're sent out to the wider community.
- Use shared Co-op Cloud services, including code hosting ([git.coopcloud.tech](https://git.coopcloud.tech)), continuous deployment ([builds.coopcloud.tech](https://builds.coopcloud.tech)) and any future digital infrastructure we all decide to set up.
### Responsibilities
**Co-op Cloud members are expected to:**
- participate in all Large decisions,
- pay a financial contribution of £10/month or more via our [Open Collective](https://opencollective.com/coop-cloud),
- uphold the Code of Co-operation (see [below](#The-Code-of-Co-operation-Proposal))
### Decision-making
We propose to follow the decision making method of [Autonomic Co-op](https://autonomic.zone) which is explained in [this blog post](https://autonomic.zone/blog/how-we-make-decisions/) and adapted here for review. Decisions can be split intro three categories: Small, Medium and Large.
#### Small - "Get on and do a thing"
- No one cares.
- Made by an individual within the federation.
- Could be in any area.
- Up to individual members to decide if they should just make the decision, or share it with the rest of the members to seek consensus.
#### Medium - "consensus pending objections"
- Potentially about shared tools, recipes, `abra`, etc.
- Doesnt have an effect on the direction or operation of Co-op Cloud as a whole.
- Give a deadline: unless other members object or ask for more time by then, it goes ahead.
- The deadline must be reasonable (a week by default).
- If any member of Co-op Cloud thinks its a Large decision, achieve Maximum Consensus™ (see [below](#Large---Maximum-Consensus-™)).
#### Large - "Maximum Consensus ™"
- Important decisions affecting the operation, direction, working conditions and finances of Co-op Cloud.
- Consensus voting: addressing any concerns.
- Can be requested by any member of Co-op Cloud for any decision.
- Input from every Co-op Cloud member.
- Whoever proposes Large decisions is responsible for chasing up members for votes.
- Votes can be in favour, against, abstain (stand aside) or block.
- One member (individual or organisation) = 1 vote
#### Process
For Medium and Large decisions:
- Write up a proposal somewhere publicly accessible on the internet.
- Announce the decision in the [General chat (`#coopcloud:autonomic.zone`)](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/intro/contact/#matrix) on Matrix
- List the decision on the [decisions page](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/democracy/decisions) on our documentation
- Announce the result in the [General chat (`#coopcloud:autonomic.zone`)](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/intro/contact/#matrix) and record it on the [decisions page](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/democracy/decisions) of the documentation
#### Proposal format
(For Medium and Large decisions).
- What you want to change.
- Who it affects.
- Size (Medium / Large).
- Decision number
- Deadline.
- What chat channel you want discussion to happen in.
#### Example Proposal
**Large decision 001**: *Change the name of Co-op Cloud to Co-op Sun*
This decision affects everyone who uses and contributes to the project. I think the current name is too corporate.
The voting deadline for this decision is **January 1st 1970**.
Please discuss this proposal in `#coopcloud-comm-org:autonomic.zone`.
---
## The Code of Co-operation Proposal
> Huge thanks to the folks at [Varia](https://varia.zone/) & [LURK](https://lurk.org) who carefully prepared wonderful Code of Conduct documents which we have adapted for our needs (with permission). See the original documents [here](https://varia.zone/en/pages/code-of-conduct.html) and [there](https://lurk.org/TOS.txt).
Co-op Cloud is used by several communities coming from a variety of cultural, ethnic and professional backgrounds. We strive for to be welcoming to people of these various backgrounds and provide a non-toxic and harassment-free environment.
The Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines that help establish shared values and ensure that behaviour that may harm participants is avoided.
We acknowledge that we come from different backgrounds and all have certain biases and privileges. Therefore, this Code of Conduct cannot account for all the ways that people might feel excluded, unsafe or uncomfortable. We commit to open dialogues, and as such this Code of Conduct is never finished and should change whenever needed. We amend this document over time so it reflects the priorities and sensitivities of the community as it changes.
It is a collective responsibility for all of us to enact the behaviour described in this document.
## Expected behaviour
We expect each other to:
### Be considerate...
...of each other, the space we enter, the Co-op Cloud community and the practices that it houses.
### Be open and generous...
...while trying not to make assumptions about others. This can include assumptions about identity, knowledge, experiences or preferred pronouns. Be generous with our time and our abilities, when we are able to. Help others, but ask first. There are many ways to contribute to a collective practice, which may differ from our individual ways.
### Be respectful...
...of different viewpoints and experiences. Respect physical and emotional boundaries. Be respectful of each others' limited time and energy. Take each other and each other's practices seriously. Acknowledge that this might lead to disagreement. However, disagreement is no excuse for poor manners.
### Be responsible....
...for the promises we make, meaning that we follow up on our commitments. We take responsibility for the good things we do, but also for the bad ones. We listen to and act upon respectful feedback. We correct ourselves when necessary, keeping in mind that the impact of our words and actions on other people doesn't always match our intent.
### Be dedicated...
...which means not letting the group happen to us, but making the group together. We participate in the group with self-respect and don't exhaust ourselves. This might mean saying how we feel, setting boundaries, being clear about our expectations. Nobody is expected to be perfect in this community. Asking questions early avoids problems later. Those who are asked should be responsive and helpful.
### Be empathetic...
..by actively listening to others and not dominating discussions. We give each other the chance to improve and let each other step up into positions of responsibility. We make room for others. We are aware of each other's feelings, provide support where necessary, and know when to step back. One's idea of caring may differ from how others want to be cared for. We ask to make sure that our actions are wanted.
### Foster an inclusive environment...
...by trying to create opportunities for others to express views, share skills and make other contributions. Being together is something we actively work on and requires negotiation. We recognize that not everyone has the same opportunities, therefore we must be sensitive to the context we operate in. There are implicit hierarchies that we can challenge, and we should strive to do so. When we organize something (projects, events, etc.), we think about how we can consider degrees of privilege, account for the needs of others, promote an activist stance and support other voices.
## Unacceptable behaviour
### No structural or personal discrimination
Attitudes or comments promoting or reinforcing the oppression of any groups or people based on gender, gender identity and expression, race, ethnicity, nationality, sexuality, sexual orientation, religion, disability, mental illness, neurodiversity, personal appearance, physical appearance, body size, age, or class. Do not claim “reverse-isms”, for example “reverse racism”.
### No harrassment
Neither public nor private. Also no deliberate intimidation, stalking, following, harassing photography or recording, disruption of events, aggressive, slanderous, derogatory, or threatening comments online or in person and unwanted physical or electronic contact or sexual attention. No posting or disseminating libel, slander, or other disinformation.
### No violation of privacy
Namely publishing others private information, such as a physical or electronic address, without explicit permission. Do not take or publish photos or recordings of others after their request to not do so. Delete recordings if asked.
### No unwelcome sexual conduct
Including unwanted sexual language, imagery, actions, attention or advances.
### No destructive behaviour
Or any other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate. This includes (but is not exclusive to) depictions of violence without content warnings, consistently and purposely derailing or disrupting conversations, or other behaviour that persistently disrupts the ability of others to engage in the group or space.
## Intervention procedure
**Immediate intervention (help is needed now!)**
If you are feeling unsafe, you can immediately contact the Co-op Cloud members who are tasked with making sure the code of co-operation is respected.
These contact people are members of Co-op Cloud who will do their best to help, or to find the correct assistance if relevant/necessary. Here is the list so far. If you would like to help in this task, please also feel free to volunteer to be a support member.
> handle: `decentral1se`
> contact: [helo@coopcloud.tech](mailto:helo@coopcloud.tech)
> handle: `3wc`
> contact: [helo@coopcloud.tech](mailto:helo@coopcloud.tech)
For example, something happened during a still-ongoing online event and needs to be acted upon right away. Action is taken immediately when this violation of the code of co-operation is reported. This could involve removing an attendee from said event.
## Non-immediate intervention (a situation that requires more time)
Other violations need to be considered and consulted upon with more people or in a more measured way. For example: If you experience an ongoing pattern of harrassment; if you witness structurally unacceptable behaviour; if somebody keeps "accidentally" using discriminatory language, after being asked to stop.
If you feel comfortable or able, discuss the issues with the involved parties before consulting a mediator. We prefer to constructively resolve disagreements together and work to right the wrong, when it is possible and safe to do so. However, if the problems still persist, those who are responsible for enforcing the code of co-operation can help you deal with these kinds of problems. Contact the members listed above. Information will be handled with sensitivity.

View File

@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
---
title: Proposals
---

24
docs/recipes/index.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
---
title: Recipes
---
!!! note "Unsure of what a "recipe" is exactly?"
Not to worry, we've got you covered, check out our [glossary page entry](/glossary#recipe).
## Catalogue
The recipe catalogue is a web interface for exploring
what kind of configurations we have available in the project and therefore what apps can be deployed.
It aims to be a helpful place to understand the status of apps, who is taking care of the configs and who is maintaining deployed instances of which app.
The recipe catalogue is available on [recipes.coopcloud.tech](https://recipes.coopcloud.tech/).
## Wishlist
If you'd like to see a new recipe packaged, make a request on the [recipes-wishlist](https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/recipes-wishlist) repository issue tracker.
We've seen nice things happen when the requesters are also willing to take an active role in testing the new recipe. Teaming up with whoever volunteers to help do the packaging is best.
If no one is around to help, you can always take a run at it yourself, we have [a section](/maintainers/) ready to help you on your way.

View File

@ -3,80 +3,3 @@
--md-primary-fg-color--light: #202674;
--md-primary-fg-color--dark: #ee4a33;
}
/* Button styling tweaks */
.md-button {
margin: .25em !important;
padding: .15em .6em !important;
font-size: .85em !important;
}
/* Navbar styling tweaks */
.md-search__form {
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 255, 0.20);
}
.md-tabs {
background-color: #6A9CFF;
}
.md-tabs__item {
font-weight: 600;
}
/* Footer styling tweaks */
.md-footer {
background-color: #485FC7;
}
.md-footer-meta {
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.45);
}
/* Mobile sidebar styling tweaks */
.md-nav__source {
background-color: #A7C5FF !important;
}
.md-nav--primary .md-nav__title {
background-color: #6A9CFF !important;
color: var(--md-primary-bg-color) !important;
}
.md-score {
display: inline-block;
padding: .15em .75em;
cursor: normal;
border-radius: .25em;
font-size: .85em;
font-weight: 700;
}
.md-score-5 {
color: #ffffff !important;
background-color: #28a745;
}
.md-score-4 {
color: #ffffff !important;
background-color: #007bff;
}
.md-score-3 {
color: #ffffff !important;
background-color: #ffc107;
}
.md-score-2 {
color: #ffffff !important;
background-color: #dc3545;
}
.md-score-1 {
color: #ffffff !important;
background-color: #343a40;
}

View File

@ -1,154 +1,81 @@
---
site_author: Co-op Cloud
site_name: "Co-op Cloud: Docs"
site_name: "Co-op Cloud: Public Interest Infrastructure"
site_url: https://docs.coopcloud.tech
use_directory_urls: true
theme:
name: material
features:
- content.action.edit
- navigation.expand
- navigation.indexes
- navigation.instant
- navigation.path
- navigation.sections
- navigation.tabs
- navigation.tabs.sticky
- navigation.tracking
- navigation.indexes
palette:
primary: light pink
accent: purple
logo: img/favicon.ico
favicon: img/favicon.ico
custom_dir: custom_theme/
copyright: Copyleft 2023 Co-op Cloud
copyright: Copyleft 🄯 2022 Co-op Cloud
markdown_extensions:
- meta
- admonition
- attr_list
- codehilite:
guess_lang: false
- def_list
- footnotes
- md_in_html
- meta
- toc:
permalink: true
- pymdownx.betterem:
smart_enable: all
- pymdownx.details
- pymdownx.emoji:
emoji_generator: !!python/name:material.extensions.emoji.to_svg
emoji_index: !!python/name:material.extensions.emoji.twemoji
- pymdownx.magiclink
- pymdownx.mark
- pymdownx.smartsymbols
- pymdownx.snippets
- pymdownx.superfences
- attr_list
- pymdownx.tabbed
- pymdownx.superfences
- pymdownx.tilde
- pymdownx.superfences:
custom_fences:
- name: mermaid
class: mermaid
format: !!python/name:pymdownx.superfences.fence_code_format
- pymdownx.magiclink
- pymdownx.emoji:
emoji_index: !!python/name:materialx.emoji.twemoji
emoji_generator: !!python/name:materialx.emoji.to_svg
nav:
- "Introduction":
- index.md
- "Frequently Asked Questions": intro/faq.md
- "Project Strategy": intro/strategy.md
- "Comparisons": intro/comparisons.md
- "Inspirations": intro/inspirations.md
- "Project Status": intro/bikemap.md
- "Managed Hosting": intro/managed.md
- "Get In Touch": intro/contact.md
- "Frequently asked questions": intro/faq.md
- "Project strategy": intro/strategy.md
- "Project status": intro/bikemap.md
- "Managed hosting": intro/managed.md
- "Get in touch": intro/contact.md
- "Credits": intro/credits.md
- "Operators":
- "Operators Guide":
- operators/index.md
- "New Operators Tutorial": operators/tutorial.md
- "Operations Handbook": operators/handbook.md
- "Maintainers":
- "New operators tutorial": operators/tutorial.md
- "Operations handbook": operators/handbook.md
- "Maintainers Guide":
- maintainers/index.md
- "New Maintainers Tutorial": maintainers/tutorial.md
- "Packaging Handbook": maintainers/handbook.md
- "Organisers":
- "New maintainers tutorial": maintainers/tutorial.md
- "Packaging handbook": maintainers/handbook.md
- "Organisers Guide":
- organisers/index.md
- "Organisers Handbook": organisers/handbook.md
- "Funding applications":
- organisers/funding-applications/index.md
- organisers/funding-applications/culture-of-solidarity.md
- organisers/funding-applications/ford-foundation.md
- organisers/funding-applications/private-funder.md
- organisers/funding-applications/sovereign-tech-fund.md
- organisers/funding-applications/user-operated-internet.md
- "Proposals":
- organisers/proposals/index.md
- organisers/proposals/federation.md
- "Organising handbook": organisers/handbook.md
- "Recipes":
- recipes/index.md
- "Abra":
- abra/index.md
- "Install": abra/install.md
- "Quick Start": abra/quickstart.md
- "Quick start": abra/quickstart.md
- "Upgrade": abra/upgrade.md
- "Design": abra/design.md
- "Recipes": abra/recipes.md
- "Hack": abra/hack.md
- "Troubleshoot": abra/trouble.md
- "Cheat Sheet": abra/cheat-sheet.md
- "Get Involved":
- get-involved/index.md
- "Support Us": get-involved/support.md
- "Federation":
- federation/index.md
- "Bylaws": federation/bylaws.md
- "Finance": federation/finance.md
- "Membership": federation/membership.md
- "Code of Co-operation": federation/code-of-coop.md
- "Resolutions":
- federation/resolutions/index.md
- "Passed":
- federation/resolutions/passed/001.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/002.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/003.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/004.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/005.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/006.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/007.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/008.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/009.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/010.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/011.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/012.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/014.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/015.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/016.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/017.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/018.md
- federation/resolutions/passed/019.md
- "In Progress":
- federation/resolutions/in-progress/013.md
- federation/resolutions/in-progress/022.md
- "Minutes":
- federation/minutes/index.md
- "Recently":
- federation/minutes/2024-04-17.md
- federation/minutes/2024-03-29.md
- "Archive":
- federation/minutes/2024-02-01.md
- federation/minutes/2022-03-03.md
- federation/minutes/2023-05-03.md
- "Digital Tools": federation/tools.md
- "Glossary":
- glossary/index.md
plugins:
- awesome-pages
- search
- awesome-pages
repo_name: coop-cloud/docs.coopcloud.tech
repo_url: https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/docs.coopcloud.tech/
repo_url: https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/docs.coopcloud.tech
edit_uri: _edit/main/docs/
extra_css:

View File

@ -1,7 +1,3 @@
{
"$schema": "https://docs.renovatebot.com/renovate-schema.json",
"packageRules": [{
"matchUpdateTypes": ["minor", "patch"],
"automerge": true
}]
"$schema": "https://docs.renovatebot.com/renovate-schema.json"
}

View File

@ -1,15 +1,4 @@
markdown~=3.2
mkdocs~=1.5.3
mkdocs-material~=9.5.7
mkdocs-material-extensions~=1.3.1
mkdocs-awesome-pages-plugin==2.9.2
pygments~=2.16
pymdown-extensions~=10.2
# Requirements for plugins
babel~=2.10
colorama~=0.4
paginate~=0.5
regex>=2022.4
requests~=2.26
mkdocs-awesome-pages-plugin==2.7.0
mkdocs-material-extensions==1.0.3
mkdocs-material==8.2.5
mkdocs==1.2.3