Git merge strategy #24

Open
opened 2026-01-20 08:56:02 +00:00 by p4u1 · 3 comments
Owner

I prefer git squash over git merge, because it makes the history cleaner. This allows for easier reviewing of the changes in a new version.

What do you think @fauno ?

I prefer git squash over git merge, because it makes the history cleaner. This allows for easier reviewing of the changes in a new version. What do you think @fauno ?
Owner

never used squash because i always had the impression it loses history, but it's true that you don't particularly come back to a very specific commit... i'm willing to try it!

never used squash because i always had the impression it loses history, but it's true that you don't particularly come back to a very specific commit... i'm willing to try it!
Author
Owner

I agree, that some history is lost, but that can always be viewed in the pull request history. If there are good reasons to do merge, we can always switch back I would say

I agree, that some history is lost, but that can always be viewed in the pull request history. If there are good reasons to do merge, we can always switch back I would say
Owner

agh i just pressed the merge button for the three prs :P next time with #25

agh i just pressed the merge button for the three prs :P next time with #25
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: coop-cloud/forgejo#24
No description provided.