The optional Voila service basically duplicates the entire app / jupyter/datascience-notebook service, just installing 1 extra pip package, and changing command. I'm suspicious this might be a waste of resources, and needless additional complexity -- wondering if we can just add Viola to the main service instead, or if there's a lighter Viola image that can be pointed at the existing Jupyter Hub for calculations instead of its own instance.
The optional [Voila](https://voila.readthedocs.io/) service basically duplicates the entire `app` / `jupyter/datascience-notebook` service, just installing 1 extra pip package, and changing `command`. I'm suspicious this might be a waste of resources, and needless additional complexity -- wondering if we can just add Viola to the main service instead, or if there's a lighter Viola image that can be pointed at the existing Jupyter Hub for calculations instead of its own instance.
3wordchant
changed title from Investigate architecture improvements for Viola service to Investigate architecture improvements for Voila service2026-05-28 17:00:33 +00:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
The optional Voila service basically duplicates the entire
app/jupyter/datascience-notebookservice, just installing 1 extra pip package, and changingcommand. I'm suspicious this might be a waste of resources, and needless additional complexity -- wondering if we can just add Viola to the main service instead, or if there's a lighter Viola image that can be pointed at the existing Jupyter Hub for calculations instead of its own instance.Investigate architecture improvements for Viola serviceto Investigate architecture improvements for Voila service