iroh-ffi is dual apache / mit but as far as I've understood, we are not obliged to follow those choices.
I would usually just "gplv3 all the things" 🤔 I'm OK with going with MIT if it's just "easier" even though I dislike permissive licenses. However, there doesn't seem like there will be a lot of code to even privatise on this end of things anyway... thoughts?
One perspective from the discord chat:
I think Apache/MIT is ideal for consistency since the rest of the bindings in other languages and iroh itself is, but ultimately your decision
`iroh-ffi` is dual [`apache`](https://github.com/n0-computer/iroh-ffi/blob/main/LICENSE-APACHE) / [`mit`](https://github.com/n0-computer/iroh-ffi/blob/main/LICENSE-MIT) but as far as I've understood, we are not obliged to follow those choices.
I would usually just "gplv3 all the things" 🤔 I'm OK with going with MIT if it's just "easier" even though I dislike permissive licenses. However, there doesn't seem like there will be a lot of code to even privatise on this end of things anyway... thoughts?
One perspective from the discord chat:
> I think Apache/MIT is ideal for consistency since the rest of the bindings in other languages and iroh itself is, but ultimately your decision
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
iroh-ffiis dualapache/mitbut as far as I've understood, we are not obliged to follow those choices.I would usually just "gplv3 all the things" 🤔 I'm OK with going with MIT if it's just "easier" even though I dislike permissive licenses. However, there doesn't seem like there will be a lot of code to even privatise on this end of things anyway... thoughts?
One perspective from the discord chat:
I'm not rocking the boat on this one.