License? #11

Closed
opened 2026-06-26 16:03:34 +00:00 by decentral1se · 1 comment
Owner

iroh-ffi is dual apache / mit but as far as I've understood, we are not obliged to follow those choices.

I would usually just "gplv3 all the things" 🤔 I'm OK with going with MIT if it's just "easier" even though I dislike permissive licenses. However, there doesn't seem like there will be a lot of code to even privatise on this end of things anyway... thoughts?

One perspective from the discord chat:

I think Apache/MIT is ideal for consistency since the rest of the bindings in other languages and iroh itself is, but ultimately your decision

`iroh-ffi` is dual [`apache`](https://github.com/n0-computer/iroh-ffi/blob/main/LICENSE-APACHE) / [`mit`](https://github.com/n0-computer/iroh-ffi/blob/main/LICENSE-MIT) but as far as I've understood, we are not obliged to follow those choices. I would usually just "gplv3 all the things" 🤔 I'm OK with going with MIT if it's just "easier" even though I dislike permissive licenses. However, there doesn't seem like there will be a lot of code to even privatise on this end of things anyway... thoughts? One perspective from the discord chat: > I think Apache/MIT is ideal for consistency since the rest of the bindings in other languages and iroh itself is, but ultimately your decision
Author
Owner
I'm not rocking the boat on this one. > https://git.coopcloud.tech/decentral1se/iroh-go/src/branch/main/licenses
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: decentral1se/iroh-go#11