forked from toolshed/docs.coopcloud.tech
		
	fix: point formatting in faq
- capitalize first letter for each point - finish all the points with a dot - add one point to 'Pros' for Docker-compose - move 'Cons' for Docker-compose into appropriate section
This commit is contained in:
		| @ -14,21 +14,21 @@ The project was started by workers at [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone/) which | |||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| #### Pros | #### Pros | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling | - 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling. | ||||||
| - 👍 Extremely modular | - 👍 Extremely modular. | ||||||
| - 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos | - 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos. | ||||||
| - 👍 Focussed on hosting providers | - 👍 Focussed on hosting providers. | ||||||
| - 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging) | - 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging). | ||||||
| - 👍 Now and always libre software | - 👍 Now and always libre software. | ||||||
| - 👍 Command line focussed | - 👍 Command line focussed. | ||||||
| - 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling | - 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling. | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| #### Cons | #### Cons | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - 👎 Still a very young project | - 👎 Still a very young project. | ||||||
| - 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps | - 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps. | ||||||
| - 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use | - 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use. | ||||||
| - 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more) | - 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more). | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| ## Why start another project? | ## Why start another project? | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| @ -53,16 +53,16 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | |||||||
| - 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management. | - 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management. | ||||||
| - 👍 Large library of apps. | - 👍 Large library of apps. | ||||||
| - 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth. | - 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth. | ||||||
| - 👍 apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team. | - 👍 Apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team. | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| #### Cons | #### Cons | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software. | - 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software. | ||||||
| - 👎 libre tier has a single app limit. | - 👎 Libre tier has a single app limit. | ||||||
| - 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid visual editor for Mediawiki) are a non-starter. | - 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid visual editor for Mediawiki) are a non-starter. | ||||||
| - 👎 Difficult to extend apps. | - 👎 Difficult to extend apps. | ||||||
| - 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu LTS. | - 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu LTS. | ||||||
| - 👎 Upstreams libre software communities aren't involved in packaging. | - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging. | ||||||
| - 👎 Limited to vertical scaling. | - 👎 Limited to vertical scaling. | ||||||
| - 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user. | - 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user. | ||||||
| - 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps. | - 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps. | ||||||
| @ -113,8 +113,8 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | |||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| #### Cons | #### Cons | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles | - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles. | ||||||
| - 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates | - 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates. | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| ### Kubernetes | ### Kubernetes | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| @ -132,6 +132,10 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n | |||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| #### Pros | #### Pros | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|  | - 👍 Quick to set up and familiar for many developers. | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|  | #### Cons | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring. | - 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring. | ||||||
| - 👎 Secret storage not available yet. | - 👎 Secret storage not available yet. | ||||||
| - 👎 [Swarm is the new best practice](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8#issuecomment-367575011). | - 👎 [Swarm is the new best practice](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8#issuecomment-367575011). | ||||||
|  | |||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user