I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 6052f2b3969feadb01662d8e2f30337d9c7f61af
Component: engine
Cleanup cobra integration
Update windows files for cobra and pflags
Cleanup SetupRootcmd, and remove unnecessary SetFlagErrorFunc.
Use cobra command traversal
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 31bf9ca0c8cf29c1ba6cdc044e81c574161a0392
Component: engine
Fix the daemon proxy for cobra commands.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 0452ff5a4dd1b8fba707235d6f12a4038208f34b
Component: engine
