This adds the docker daemon's root directory to docker info when running
in debug mode. This allows the user to view the root directory where
docker is writing and storing state.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 654da4e151c449725b6996d47b7ff33767e87da9
Component: engine
Add the test case of this issue.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Chen Chao <cc272309126@gmail.com> (github: cc272309126)
Upstream-commit: 1bb02117db80e75f406f6c63d8d50680c1569019
Component: engine
Use transaction logic during device deletion and do rollback if transaction
is not complete. Following is the sequence of events.
- Open transaction and save to metafile
- Delete device from pool
- Delete device metadata file from disk
- Close Transaction
If docker crashes without closing transaction then rollback will take
place upon next docker start.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 17b75a21a667a27a9a27565ab282cd615dbdb66e
Component: engine
Finally this patch uses the notion of transaction for device or snapshot
device creation.
Following is sequence of event.
- Open a trasaction and save details in a file.
- Create a new device/snapshot device
- If a new device id is used, refresh transaction with new device id details.
- Create device metadata file
- Close transaction.
If docker crashes anywhere in between without closing transaction, then
upon next start, docker will figure out that there was a pending transaction
and it will roll back transaction. That is it will do following.
- Delete Device from pool
- Delete device metadata file
- Remove transaction file to mark no transaction is pending.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: c115c4aa45ba82f27859b0afba5724d437857879
Component: engine
Finally, we seem to have all the bits to keep track of all used device
Ids and find a free device Id to use when creating a new device. Start
using it.
Ideally we should completely move away from retry logic when pool returns
-EEXISTS. For now I have retained that logic and I simply output a warning.
When things are stable, we should be able to get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: e28a419e1197bf50bbb378b02f0226c3115edeaa
Component: engine
Open code createDevice() and createSnapDevice() and move all the logic
in the caller.
This is a sheer code reorganization so that all device Id allocation
logic is in one function. That way in case of erros, one can easily
cleanup and mark device Id free again. (Later patches benefit from
it).
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 14d0dd855ee1e7cd1a3185c3d5a00e7afccb5c43
Component: engine
Right now we are accessing devices.NextDeviceId directly and also
incrementing it at various places.
Instead provide a helper function which is responsile for
incrementing NextDeviceId and return next deviceId.
This is just code structuring. This will help later once we
convert this function to find a free device Id and it goes
through a bitmap of used/free device Ids.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: a44c23fe6604d1de59c64bbb9dc234c7c3dbede9
Component: engine
When docker starts, build a used/free Device Id map from the per
device meta files we already have. These meta files have the data
which device Ids are in use. Parse these files and mark device as
used in the map.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 39dc7829dea87d4be8e6e9b2a598fb354ebf4ba0
Component: engine
Currently devicemapper backend does not keep track of used device Ids in
the pool. It tries a device Id and if that device Id exists in pool, it
tries with a different Id and keeps on doing this in a loop till it succeeds.
This worked fine so far but now we are moving to transaction based
device creation and deletion. We will keep deviceId information in
transaction which will be rolled back if docker crashed before transaction
was complete.
If we store a deviceId in transaction and later figure out it already
existed in pool and docker crashed, then we will rollback and remove
that existing device Id from pool (which we should not have).
That means, we should know free device Id in pool in advance before
we put that device Id in transaction.
Hence this patch creates a bitmap (one bit each for a deviceId), and
sets the bit if device Id is used otherwise resets it. This patch
is just preparing the ground right now. Actual usage will follow
in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 4d39e056aac2fadffcb8560101f3c31a2b7db3ae
Component: engine
Right now setupBaseImage() uses deleteDevice() to delete uninitialized
base image while rest of the code uses DeleteDevice(). Change it and
use a common function everywhere for the sake of uniformity.
I can't see what harm can be done by doing little extra locking done
by DeleteDevice().
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 359a38b26a164f430c79fe542babb77c6e48dcc3
Component: engine
Very soon we will have the notion of an open transaction and keep its
details in a metafile.
When a new transaction is opened, we allocate a new transaction Id,
do the device creation/deletion and then we will close the transaction.
I thought that OpenTransactionId better represents the semantics of
transaction Id associated with an open transaction instead of NewtransactionId.
This patch just does the renaming. No functionality change.
I have also introduced a structure "Transaction" which will keep all
the details associated with a transaction. Later patches will add more
fields in this structure.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: f078bcd8e50913fd8b05022ebd047c5a1f2e3d52
Component: engine
Currently new transaction Id is created using allocateTransactionId()
function. This function takes NewTransactionId and bumps up by one
to create NewTransactionId.
I think ideally we should be bumping up devices.TransactionId by 1
to come up with NewTransactionId. Because idea is that devices.TransactionId
contains the current pool transaction Id and to come up with a new
transaction Id bump it up by one.
Current code is not wrong as we are keeping NewTransactionId and
TransactionId in sync. But it will be more direct if we look at
devices.TransactionId to come up with NewTransactionId. That way
we don't have to even initialize NewTransactionId during startup
as first time somebody wants to do a transaction, it will be
allocated fresh.
So simplify the code a bit. No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 7b0a1b814b8f13e30df466dd66c3fdc2114eac28
Component: engine
Currently updatePoolTransactionId() checks if NewTransactionId and
TransactionId are not same only then update the transaction Id in pool. This
check is redundant. Currently we call updatePoolTransactionId() only from
two places and both of these first allocate a new transaction Id.
Also updatePoolTransactionId() should only be called after allocating
new transaction Id otherwise it does not make any sense.
Remove the redundant check and reduce confusion.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 6d347aeb6984ebdcb1051212ab3103880ef69ab0
Component: engine
Create two new helper functions for device and snap device creation. These
functions will not only create the device and also register the device.
Again, makes the code structure better and keeps all transaction logic
contained to functions instead of spilling over into functions like
setupBaseImage or AddDevice().
Just the code reorganization. No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: ad9118c696c0953ec48eec15ea4b7546296d7c20
Component: engine
Currently registerDevice() adds a device to in-memory table, saves metadata
and also updates the pool transaction ID.
Now move transaciton Id update out of registerDevice() and provide a new
function unregisterDevice() which does the reverse of registerDevice().
This will simplify some code down the line and make it more structured.
This is just code reorganization and should not change functionality.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 442247927b8e6c102ce1f94de58c7f93aab3d271
Component: engine
Currently devicemapper CreateDevice and CreateSnapDevice keep on retrying
device creation till a suitable device id is found.
With new transaction mechanism we need to store device id in transaction
before it has been created.
So change the logic in such a way that caller decides the devices Id to
use. If that device Id is not available, caller bumps up the device Id
and retries.
That way caller can update transaciton too when it tries a new Id. Transaction
related patches will come later in the series.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 7b2b15d3e9f9b7ad898a36bbe5ceb42c9ca58d47
Component: engine
When we are deleting a device, we also delete associated metadata file. If
that file removal fails, we are adding back the device in in-memory
table. I really can't see what's the point. When next lookup takes place
it will be automatically loaded if need be. Remove that code.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 5be77901cd505aad002b912b5febe2ba6baa23fd
Component: engine
Right now initMetaData() first queries the pool for current transaciton Id
and then it migrates the old metafile.
Move pool transaction Id query and file migration in separate functions
for better code reuse and organization.
Given we have removed device transaction Id dependency from saveMetaData(),
we don't have to query pool transaction Id before migrating files.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 824a87f7efb94e4f307d920c3c3689156d6e633f
Component: engine
Right now saveMetaData() is kind of little overloaded function. It is
supposed to save file metadata to disk. But in addition if user has
bumped up NewTransactionId before calling saveMetaData(), then it will
also update the transaction ID in pool.
Keep saveMetaData() simple and let it just save the file. Any update
of pool transaction ID is done inline in the code which needs it.
Also create an helper function updatePoolTransactionId() to update pool
transaction Id.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 0db6cc85edfccb16ce5308eea767530e1a3f6906
Component: engine
Remove call to allocateTransactionId() during device removal. This seems to
be unnecessary and it is not clear what this call is doing.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 004d8b9b337f4a6cf68c124e89e02e673c6320fc
Component: engine
Again, just because device transaction id is greater than pool transaction
id, it does not guarantee that device is in the pool. So do not check
of this during loading of device metadata.
Docker needs to deal with it. And device activation will fail when we try
to activate a device for whom metafile is present but there is no device
in the pool.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: b721d6d8d0313fbb4b80e12318c96fc4004ee96b
Component: engine
Current code is associating a transaction id with each device and if pool
transaction id is greater that value, then current code assumes that device
is there in pool.
Transaction id of pool is a mechanism so that during device creation and
removal one can define a transaction and during startup figure out if
transaction was complete or not. I think we are using transaction id
throughout the code little inappropriately.
For example, if a device is being deleted, it is possible that we deleted
the device from pool but before we could delete metafile docker crashed.
When docker comes back it will think that device is in the pool (due to
device transaction id being less than pool transaction id) but device
is not in the pool.
Similary, it could happen that some data in the pool is corrupted and
during pool repair some devices are lost (without docker knowing about
it). In that case tool pool transaction id will be higher than device
transaction id and there are no guaratees that device is actually in
the pool.
So move away from this model where we think that a device is in pool if pool
transaction id is greater than device transaction Id. Per device
transaction Id just says that after device creation this should be pool's
transaction Id and nothing more.
Transaction id is per pool property (as opposed to per device property) and
will be used internally to figure out if last transaction was complete or
not and recover from failure during docker startup.
If for some reason metafile is present but device is not in pool, then
device activation will fail later.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: bb00453e58a86b9787ac4b3e7df3c48d8ddc3f87
Component: engine
This only renames docker internal structures.
It has no impact on the end-user.
Signed-off-by: Lénaïc Huard <lhuard@amadeus.com>
Upstream-commit: 2352f00e4ff2cd102a4d591d67aba8e1c7eaa7b6
Component: engine
so that docker is started with `docker -d -s overlay` instead of `docker -d -s overlayfs`
Signed-off-by: Lénaïc Huard <lhuard@amadeus.com>
Upstream-commit: d680ca5c96484474757fb6f92274f47bf1520631
Component: engine
Current description is misleading. It make an impression the --icc=false
prevents containers to talk with each other.
Signed-off-by: Michal Minar <miminar@redhat.com>
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Michal Minar <miminar@redhat.com> (github: SvenDowideit)
Upstream-commit: a61a4a31882335020cfbffc49ffe274847a5c803
Component: engine
The `Engine.Logf` method was unused and confusing.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Porterie <arnaud.porterie@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 59da197de8f040eed7560747476f97ce8afad293
Component: engine
Since Linux 3.18-rc6, overlayfs has been renamed overlay.
This change was introduced by the following commit in linux.git:
ef94b1864d1ed5be54376404bb23d22ed0481feb ovl: rename filesystem type to "overlay"
Signed-off-by: Lénaïc Huard <lhuard@amadeus.com>
Upstream-commit: c57317893a743720a241ae328d1bdf7bd02b1fea
Component: engine
Sometimes other programs can bind on ports from our range, so we just
skip this ports on allocation.
Fixes#9293
Probably fixes#8714
Signed-off-by: Alexander Morozov <lk4d4@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: a00a1a1fca020d21cb677439160e018bda5c3835
Component: engine
