Some tests had to be skipped as there's some issues to address, and
some of the result-types cannot be mocked / stubbed.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
It's part of the presentation logic of the cli, and only used internally.
We can consider providing utilities for these, but better as part of
separate packages.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
This utility was only used internally, and has no external consumers;
move it to the "formatter" package, which is also imported in all files
using this utility.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
- make it possible to extract the formatter implementation from the
"common" code, that way, the formatter package stays small
- extract some formatter into their own packages
This is essentially moving the "formatter" implementation of each type
in their respective packages. The *main* reason to do that, is to be
able to depend on `cli/command/formatter` without depending of the
implementation detail of the formatter. As of now, depending on
`cli/command/formatter` means we depend on `docker/docker/api/types`,
`docker/licensing`, … — that should not be the case. `formatter`
should hold the common code (or helpers) to easily create formatter,
not all formatter implementations.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
