Use deactivateDevice() instead of removeDevice() directly. This will make
sure for device deletion, deferred removal is used if user has configured
it in. Also this makes reading code litle easier as there is single function
to remove a device and that is deactivateDevice().
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 39081eb3aa8f715c1da6f798c6531efd7a8a494c
Component: engine
If a device is still mounted at the time of DeleteDevice(), that means
higher layers have not called Put() properly on the device and are trying
to delete it. This is a bug in the code where Get() and Put() have not been
properly paired up. Fail device deletion if it is still mounted.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: e97e46b7376c3195383636d305d832b2ba3f82c5
Component: engine
Exists() and HasDevice() just check if device file exists or not. It does
not say anything about if device is mounted or not. Fix comments.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: f5c0eb9ffe9a9d30ac6ff81fa1a4c216908189a6
Component: engine
device has map (device.Devices), contains valid devices and we skip all
the files which are not device files. transaction metadata file is not
device file. Skip this file when devices files are being read and loaded
into map.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: ba02bf31cbffe329e549516e0004cf113ab4517e
Component: engine
Signed-off-by: Stefan J. Wernli <swernli@microsoft.com>
Windows: add support for images stored in alternate location.
Signed-off-by: Stefan J. Wernli <swernli@microsoft.com>
Upstream-commit: dfbb5520e3b35030f3eef38d5a2d86ad20ea0a2f
Component: engine
Commit e27c904 added a wrong and misleading comment
to GetMetadata(). Fix it using the wording from
commit 407a626 which introduced GetMetadata().
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>
Upstream-commit: 15a232fd06e062f8aae4e89e1f520f44c875daeb
Component: engine
These functions are not part of the graphdriver.Driver
interface and should therefore be private.
Also, remove comments added by commit e27c904 as they are
* pretty obvious
* no longer required by golint
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>
Upstream-commit: f5f7fee2ecc964314b2a7b910fda71a157c90f16
Component: engine
Fixes: #15279
Due to
7904946eeb
the devices field is dropped.
This solution works on go1.4 and go1.5
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: f83d05c3be3c3bcc84f6fa229504848ee8078321
Component: engine
Ploop graph driver provides its own ext4 filesystem to every
container. It so happens that ext4 root comes with lost+found
directory, causing failures from DriverTestCreateEmpty() and
DriverTestCreateBase() tests on ploop.
While I am not yet ready to submit ploop graph driver for review,
this change looks simple enough to push.
Note that filtering is done without any additional allocations,
as described in https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/SliceTricks.
[v2: added a comment about lost+found]
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>
Upstream-commit: 158c536267a6530082cd60ba8f79a86444f0d2eb
Component: engine
TL;DR: check for IsExist(err) after a failed MkdirAll() is both
redundant and wrong -- so two reasons to remove it.
Quoting MkdirAll documentation:
> MkdirAll creates a directory named path, along with any necessary
> parents, and returns nil, or else returns an error. If path
> is already a directory, MkdirAll does nothing and returns nil.
This means two things:
1. If a directory to be created already exists, no error is returned.
2. If the error returned is IsExist (EEXIST), it means there exists
a non-directory with the same name as MkdirAll need to use for
directory. Example: we want to MkdirAll("a/b"), but file "a"
(or "a/b") already exists, so MkdirAll fails.
The above is a theory, based on quoted documentation and my UNIX
knowledge.
3. In practice, though, current MkdirAll implementation [1] returns
ENOTDIR in most of cases described in #2, with the exception when
there is a race between MkdirAll and someone else creating the
last component of MkdirAll argument as a file. In this very case
MkdirAll() will indeed return EEXIST.
Because of #1, IsExist check after MkdirAll is not needed.
Because of #2 and #3, ignoring IsExist error is just plain wrong,
as directory we require is not created. It's cleaner to report
the error now.
Note this error is all over the tree, I guess due to copy-paste,
or trying to follow the same usage pattern as for Mkdir(),
or some not quite correct examples on the Internet.
[v2: a separate aufs commit is merged into this one]
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/blob/f9ed2f75/src/os/path.go
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>
Upstream-commit: a83a76934787a20e96389d33bd56a09369f9b808
Component: engine
The `ApplyDiff` function takes a tar archive stream that is
automagically decompressed later. This was causing a double
decompression, and when the layer was empty, that causes an early EOF.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 273f50c741e82a0be3e9f9d4c975cc18801dfe38
Component: engine
