If a build context tar has path names of the form 'x/./y', they will be
stored in this unnormalized form internally by tarsum. When the builder
walks the untarred directory tree and queries hashes for each relative
path, it will query paths of the form 'x/y', and they will not be found.
To correct this, have tarsum normalize path names by calling Clean.
Add a test to detect this caching false positive.
Fixes#21715
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 8691a77e441996fef96019b94f299a11b7244080
Component: engine
Also stop execution of run immediately if request was cancelled.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Morozov <lk4d4@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: f2401a0f6960734093be307a27bba85a3c2ecfcd
Component: engine
This adds support for the passthrough on build, push, login, and search.
Revamp the integration test to cover these cases and make it more
robust.
Use backticks instead of quoted strings for backslash-heavy string
contstands.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: c44e7a3e632c3ea961cb8c12ba45371f54e6699c
Component: engine
Move context parsing to the backend.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 93e02efa909896548496a5bd6621221aa541dc50
Component: engine
Moving all strings to the errors package wasn't a good idea after all.
Our custom implementation of Go errors predates everything that's nice
and good about working with errors in Go. Take as an example what we
have to do to get an error message:
```go
func GetErrorMessage(err error) string {
switch err.(type) {
case errcode.Error:
e, _ := err.(errcode.Error)
return e.Message
case errcode.ErrorCode:
ec, _ := err.(errcode.ErrorCode)
return ec.Message()
default:
return err.Error()
}
}
```
This goes against every good practice for Go development. The language already provides a simple, intuitive and standard way to get error messages, that is calling the `Error()` method from an error. Reinventing the error interface is a mistake.
Our custom implementation also makes very hard to reason about errors, another nice thing about Go. I found several (>10) error declarations that we don't use anywhere. This is a clear sign about how little we know about the errors we return. I also found several error usages where the number of arguments was different than the parameters declared in the error, another clear example of how difficult is to reason about errors.
Moreover, our custom implementation didn't really make easier for people to return custom HTTP status code depending on the errors. Again, it's hard to reason about when to set custom codes and how. Take an example what we have to do to extract the message and status code from an error before returning a response from the API:
```go
switch err.(type) {
case errcode.ErrorCode:
daError, _ := err.(errcode.ErrorCode)
statusCode = daError.Descriptor().HTTPStatusCode
errMsg = daError.Message()
case errcode.Error:
// For reference, if you're looking for a particular error
// then you can do something like :
// import ( derr "github.com/docker/docker/errors" )
// if daError.ErrorCode() == derr.ErrorCodeNoSuchContainer { ... }
daError, _ := err.(errcode.Error)
statusCode = daError.ErrorCode().Descriptor().HTTPStatusCode
errMsg = daError.Message
default:
// This part of will be removed once we've
// converted everything over to use the errcode package
// FIXME: this is brittle and should not be necessary.
// If we need to differentiate between different possible error types,
// we should create appropriate error types with clearly defined meaning
errStr := strings.ToLower(err.Error())
for keyword, status := range map[string]int{
"not found": http.StatusNotFound,
"no such": http.StatusNotFound,
"bad parameter": http.StatusBadRequest,
"conflict": http.StatusConflict,
"impossible": http.StatusNotAcceptable,
"wrong login/password": http.StatusUnauthorized,
"hasn't been activated": http.StatusForbidden,
} {
if strings.Contains(errStr, keyword) {
statusCode = status
break
}
}
}
```
You can notice two things in that code:
1. We have to explain how errors work, because our implementation goes against how easy to use Go errors are.
2. At no moment we arrived to remove that `switch` statement that was the original reason to use our custom implementation.
This change removes all our status errors from the errors package and puts them back in their specific contexts.
IT puts the messages back with their contexts. That way, we know right away when errors used and how to generate their messages.
It uses custom interfaces to reason about errors. Errors that need to response with a custom status code MUST implementent this simple interface:
```go
type errorWithStatus interface {
HTTPErrorStatusCode() int
}
```
This interface is very straightforward to implement. It also preserves Go errors real behavior, getting the message is as simple as using the `Error()` method.
I included helper functions to generate errors that use custom status code in `errors/errors.go`.
By doing this, we remove the hard dependency we have eeverywhere to our custom errors package. Yes, you can use it as a helper to generate error, but it's still very easy to generate errors without it.
Please, read this fantastic blog post about errors in Go: http://dave.cheney.net/2014/12/24/inspecting-errors
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: a793564b2591035aec5412fbcbcccf220c773a4c
Component: engine
Most of them were found and fixed by codespell.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Upstream-commit: 2eee613326fb59fd168849618d14a9054a40f9f5
Component: engine
also fix wrong function comment
Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca <runcom@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: d266142230bd041c8299eef329cf79a17f8f7478
Component: engine
This feels like it's where it belongs and it makes it exported
again (which is needed for libcompose that was using it before 1.10).
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
Upstream-commit: fc6122a947f9eb9fc2f54fb8ba3b9da4531a6b99
Component: engine
Currently, daemonbuilder package (part of daemon) implemented the
builder backend. However, it was a very thin wrapper around daemon
methods and caused an implementation dependency for api/server build
endpoint. api/server buildrouter should only know about the backend
implementing the /build API endpoint.
Removing daemonbuilder involved moving build specific methods to
respective files in the daemon, where they fit naturally.
Signed-off-by: Anusha Ragunathan <anusha@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 9c332b164f1aefa2407706adf59d50495d6e02cb
Component: engine
Currently builder.Backend is implemented by daemonbuilder.Docker{} for
the daemon. This registration happens in the API/server code. However,
this is too implementation specific. Ideally we should be able to specify
that docker daemon (or any other) is implementing the Backend and abstract
the implementation details. So we should remove package daemonbuilder
dependency in build_routes.go
With this change, daemonbuilder.Docker is nothing more than the daemon.
A follow on change will remove the daemonbuilder package and move relevant
methods under daemon, so that API only knows about the backend.
Also cleanup code in api/client/build.go. docker cli always performs build
context tar download for remoteURLs and sends an empty remoteContext. So
remove relevant dead code.
Signed-off-by: Anusha Ragunathan <anusha@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 14215ed5a1900a88a3b17dd7cd566def50bfcbc9
Component: engine
Merge was used by builder and daemon. With this commit, the builder
call has been inlined and the function moved to the daemon package,
which is the only other caller.
Signed-off-by: Anusha Ragunathan <anusha@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: eb4ae8e28aa0baf28d6cde1079a5f9c618d475b2
Component: engine
dockerfile.Config is almost redundant with ImageBuildOptions.
Unify the two so that the latter can be removed. This also
helps build's API endpoint code to be less dependent on package
dockerfile.
Signed-off-by: Anusha Ragunathan <anusha@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 5190794f1d85d5406611eb69c270df62ac1cdc7f
Component: engine
