Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Phil Estes <estesp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (github: estesp)
Upstream-commit: ee17b93df9ef2150d0ef25e077f1f87637a54508
Component: engine
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Phil Estes <estesp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (github: estesp)
Upstream-commit: 6589044b5b84f82a71a756708b4a77b0bc49db42
Component: engine
Never close attached stream before both stdout and stderr have written
all their buffered contents. Remove stdinCloser because it is not needed
any more as the stream is closed anyway after attach has finished.
Fixes#3631
Signed-off-by: Andy Goldstein <agoldste@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 5572dbb7504c951f4ddd2710a4037844a95caa6a
Component: engine
Stable IPs causes some regressions in the way people use Docker, see GH#8493.
Reverting it for 1.3, we'll enable it back for the next release.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Luzzardi <aluzzardi@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 5b8379a4349105eb387a4b9836bbd1d83ebe6928
Component: engine
When a container is restarted all the volume configs are parsed again.
Even if the volume was already handled in a previous start it was still
calling "FindOrCreateVolume" on the volume repo causing a new volume to
be created.
This wasn't being detected because as part of the mount initialization
it checks to see if the the _mount_ was already initialized, but this
happens after the parsing of the configs.
So a check is added during parsing to skip a volume which was already
created for that container.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: c985302c5c2fb6d922acf29106b550cb36faaab6
Component: engine
When stdout/stderr is closed prematurely, the proxy's writes to stdout/stderr
(i.e. `log.Errorf/log.Printf`) will returns with EPIPE error, and go runtime
will terminate the proxy when stdout/stderr writes trigger 10 EPIPE errors.
instead of using stdout/stderr as the status handler, we pass an extra file to
the child process and write `0\n` or `1\nerror message` to it and close it
after. This allow the child process to handle stdout/stderr as normal.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Daniel, Dao Quang Minh <dqminh89@gmail.com> (github: dqminh)
Upstream-commit: 3b9d88210e763bebdfd7badb6ed3fd507d0f6513
Component: engine
Prior to the volumes re-factor, data was not being copied on
volumes-from or host-mounted volumes.
After the re-factor, data was being copied for volumes-from.
This reverts this unintentional change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: e95b6fb648ab6301b556192a9730a843fab7209f
Component: engine
Needed to check if the mode was invalid and return error, not valid and
return error.
This didn't get picked up because the existing integration-cli tests
were all either expecting errors when a valid mode was passed in (e.g.
"ro" passed in, we expected an error because it was testing write). So
modified a test which was testing for "rw" to actually pass in "rw"
instead of assuming the "rw"
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <bgoff@cpuguy83-mbp.home> (github: cpuguy83)
Upstream-commit: 007b4f63409c6c642fb075640a8ec7d58825edc8
Component: engine
This change will allocate network settings (IP and public ports) at
container creation rather than start and keep them throughout the
lifetime of the container (i.e. until it gets destroyed) instead of
discarding them when the container is stopped.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Luzzardi <aluzzardi@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: a4875937293f3b0a8ffc569608bbca40a456e9c8
Component: engine
volumes.Get was not checking for symlinked paths meanwhile when adding a
new volume it was following the symlink.
So when trying to use a bind-mount that is a symlink, the volume is
added with the correct path, but when another container tries to use the
same volume it got a "Volume exists" error because volumes.Get returned
nil and as such attempted to create a new volume.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com> (github: cpuguy83)
Upstream-commit: 882223c0f8a55c2011277aba08f1487a2930c075
Component: engine
This adds a --add-host host:ip flag which appends lines to /etc/hosts. This is needed in places where you want the container to get a different name resolution than it would through DNS. This was submitted before as #5525, closed, and now I am re-opening. It has come up 2 or 3 times in the last couple days.
Signed-off-by: Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>
Upstream-commit: 68e48b65a64df10fc797cbaa89d6caa2188eadc9
Component: engine
