jm.ID is already checked in the outer "if",
so theres no reason to check it again here.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Upstream-commit: 7a6f5d9b3186de2116686d5e2c40eff673dae6ec
Component: engine
In the existing code, "diff" has function scope and the value from the
previous iteration may be used if it is not reset. This appears to be an
oversight. This commit changes its scope to the for loop body.
One confusing point is that the cursor movement escape sequences appear
to be necessary even if the requested movement is 0. I haven't been able
to figure out why this makes a difference.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 59df2adc071e0186ccd0ba7ea9387142e168d735
Component: engine
When we handle a message that isn't tracked in the "line" map (for
example, one with no ID), clear the line map. This means we won't update
lines that were part of a previous, completed set of operations when
doing something like pull -a. It also has the beneficial side effect
of avoiding terminal glitching in these types of situations, since
messages that don't get tracked in the "line" map cause the count of the
number of lines to get out of sync.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: fc41d393946e6da59792da9ed6e5ab8ed6f58814
Component: engine
Although having a request ID available throughout the codebase is very
valuable, the impact of requiring a Context as an argument to every
function in the codepath of an API request, is too significant and was
not properly understood at the time of the review.
Furthermore, mixing API-layer code with non-API-layer code makes the
latter usable only by API-layer code (one that has a notion of Context).
This reverts commit de4164043546d2b9ee3bf323dbc41f4979c84480, reversing
changes made to 7daeecd42d7bb112bfe01532c8c9a962bb0c7967.
Signed-off-by: Tibor Vass <tibor@docker.com>
Conflicts:
api/server/container.go
builder/internals.go
daemon/container_unix.go
daemon/create.go
Upstream-commit: b08f071e18043abe8ce15f56826d38dd26bedb78
Component: engine
This PR adds a "request ID" to each event generated, the 'docker events'
stream now looks like this:
```
2015-09-10T15:02:50.000000000-07:00 [reqid: c01e3534ddca] de7c5d4ca927253cf4e978ee9c4545161e406e9b5a14617efb52c658b249174a: (from ubuntu) create
```
Note the `[reqID: c01e3534ddca]` part, that's new.
Each HTTP request will generate its own unique ID. So, if you do a
`docker build` you'll see a series of events all with the same reqID.
This allow for log processing tools to determine which events are all related
to the same http request.
I didn't propigate the context to all possible funcs in the daemon,
I decided to just do the ones that needed it in order to get the reqID
into the events. I'd like to have people review this direction first, and
if we're ok with it then I'll make sure we're consistent about when
we pass around the context - IOW, make sure that all funcs at the same level
have a context passed in even if they don't call the log funcs - this will
ensure we're consistent w/o passing it around for all calls unnecessarily.
ping @icecrime @calavera @crosbymichael
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Upstream-commit: 26b1064967d9fcefd4c35f60e96bf6d7c9a3b5f8
Component: engine
This way provide both Time and TimeNano in the event. For the display of
the JSONMessage, use either, but prefer TimeNano Proving only TimeNano
would break Subscribers that are using the `Time` field, so both are set
for backwards compatibility.
The events logging uses nano formatting, but only provides a Unix()
time, therefor ordering may get lost in the output. Example:
```
2015-09-15T14:18:51.000000000-04:00 ee46febd64ac629f7de9cd8bf58582e6f263d97ff46896adc5b508db804682da: (from busybox) resize
2015-09-15T14:18:51.000000000-04:00 a78c9149b1c0474502a117efaa814541926c2ae6ec3c76607e1c931b84c3a44b: (from busybox) resize
```
By having a field just for Nano time, when set, the marshalling back to
`time.Unix(sec int64, nsec int64)` has zeros exactly where it needs to.
This does not break any existing use of jsonmessage.JSONMessage, but now
allows for use of `UnixNano()` and get event formatting that has
distinguishable order. Example:
```
2015-09-15T15:37:23.810295632-04:00 6adcf8ed9f5f5ec059a915466cd1cde86a18b4a085fc3af405e9cc9fecbbbbaf: (from busybox) resize
2015-09-15T15:37:23.810412202-04:00 6b7c5bfdc3f902096f5a91e628f21bd4b56e32590c5b4b97044aafc005ddcb0d: (from busybox) resize
```
Including tests for TimeNano and updated event API reference doc.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
Upstream-commit: 4026512a2c535fe377a4cf834b7a78fccfd82dab
Component: engine
The practice of buffering to a tempfile during a pushing contributes massively
to slow V2 push performance perception. The protocol was actually designed to
avoid precalculation, supporting cut-through data push. This means we can
assemble the layer, calculate its digest and push to the remote endpoint, all
at the same time.
This should increase performance massively on systems with slow disks or IO
bottlenecks.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 349aef06d51a9425f70a877585fe45283366c2c4
Component: engine
Some structures use int for sizes and UNIX timestamps. On some
platforms, int is 32 bits, so this can lead to the year 2038 issues and
overflows when dealing with large containers or layers.
Consistently use int64 to store sizes and UNIX timestamps in
api/types/types.go. Update related to code accordingly (i.e.
strconv.FormatInt instead of strconv.Itoa).
Use int64 in progressreader package to avoid integer overflow when
dealing with large quantities. Update related code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 1f61084d83aea37b212468aaa975020094b7f7c9
Component: engine
