While working on the fix for #8330 I noticed a few things:
1 - the split() call for the .dockerignore process will generate a blank
"exclude". While this isn't causing an issue right now, I got worried
that in the future some code later on might interpret "" as something bad,
like "everything" or ".". So I added a check for an empty "exclude"
and skipped it
2 - if someone puts "foo" in their .dockerignore then we'll skip "foo".
However, if they put "./foo" then we won't due to the painfully
simplistic logic of go's filepath.Match algorithm. To help things
a little (and to treat ./Dockerfile just like Dockerfile) I added
code to filepath.Clean() each entry in .dockerignore. It should
result in the same semantic path but ensure that no matter how the
user expresses the path, we'll match it.
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Upstream-commit: c0f0f5c9887032c606750b645001829d9f14f47c
Component: engine
f115554d46