forked from toolshed/docs.coopcloud.tech
		
	Trim intro and add FAQ
This commit is contained in:
		
							
								
								
									
										57
									
								
								docs/faq.md
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										57
									
								
								docs/faq.md
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							| @ -0,0 +1,57 @@ | ||||
| --- | ||||
| title: Frequently Asked Questions | ||||
| --- | ||||
|  | ||||
| ## What is the Cooperative Cloud? | ||||
|  | ||||
| The Cooperative Cloud is a platform built by and for worked-owned technology | ||||
| cooperatives which proposes a shared social and technical infrastructure for | ||||
| the operation and management of free software applications. | ||||
|  | ||||
| ## What about <insert-your-favourite-alternative\>? | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Cloudron | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Lovely web interface for application, domain & user management | ||||
| - 👍 Bigger library of applications | ||||
| - 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more applications and often has a better user interface than OAuth | ||||
| - 👍 Most applications are actively maintained by the Cloudron team | ||||
| - 👎 Moving away from open source. Free version has a 1-application limit | ||||
| - 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process applications (e.g. parsoid for Mediawiki) are a non-starter | ||||
| - 👎 Difficult to extend applications | ||||
| - 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu | ||||
| - 👎 Upstreams free software communities aren't involved | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### YunoHost | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Lovely web interface for application, domain & user management | ||||
| - 👍 Bigger library of applications | ||||
| - 👍 Awesome backup / deploy / restore continuous integration testing | ||||
| - 👍 Supports hosting applications in subdirectories as well as subdomains | ||||
| - 👍 Doesn't require a public-facing IP | ||||
| - 👎 Upstreams free software communities aren't involved | ||||
| - 👎 Often not idempotent: uninstalling applications leaves growing cruft | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Ansible | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Includes server creation and bootstrapping | ||||
| - 👎 Upstream free software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles | ||||
| - 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like application isolation, backups, updates | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Kubernetes | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Helm charts are available for some key applications already | ||||
| - 👎 Too big -- requires 3rd party tools to run a single-node instance | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Docker-compose | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring | ||||
| - 👎 Secret storage not available yet | ||||
| - 👎 [Swarm is the new best practice](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8#issuecomment-367575011) | ||||
|  | ||||
| ### Doing it Manually | ||||
|  | ||||
| - 👍 Simple - just follow upstream instructions to install and update | ||||
| - 👎 Loads of manual work required for application isolation and backups | ||||
| - 👎 Array of sysadmin skills required to install applications | ||||
| - 👎 Hard to share configurations into the commons | ||||
| @ -9,27 +9,17 @@ initiated by [Autonomic]. | ||||
|  | ||||
| The project arose out of the understanding that technology cooperatives | ||||
| continue to struggle to deliver free software solutions without relying on | ||||
| monopolies such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon for technical infrastructure | ||||
| and software tools. The contradictions of working with these abusive and | ||||
| extractive forces brings the idea of offering an alternative into question. | ||||
| monopolies such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon for technical infrastructure. | ||||
| The contradictions of working with abusive and extractive forces brings the | ||||
| idea of offering an alternative into question. | ||||
|  | ||||
| [The technological crisis is a social crisis]. Therefore, building an | ||||
| [The technological crisis is a social crisis] and therefore building an | ||||
| alternative digital future cannot be done without broad and meaningful | ||||
| cooperation. The Cooperative Cloud project takes as its starting point, the | ||||
| independent free software community standards, tools, approaches and governance | ||||
| methods which cooperatives can make use of as part of offering a real | ||||
| alternative. | ||||
|  | ||||
| The Cooperative Cloud should not be seen as a technical solution for a social | ||||
| problem (i.e. "Big Tech"). We understand that owning the common technological | ||||
| means for delivering free software is only one part of the struggle to reclaim | ||||
| technology today. If antitrust litigation dismantled the monopolies tomorrow, | ||||
| we'd need our own organisations and robust technical capacity to fill the | ||||
| resulting vacuum. From this perspective, the project can be seen as another | ||||
| approach to building community power by focussing on the cooperative ways and | ||||
| means of managing the free software applications on which so much of our lives | ||||
| have come to rely on. | ||||
|  | ||||
| To learn more, please see the [Getting Started guide]. | ||||
|  | ||||
| [autonomic]: https://autonomic.zone/ | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -1,37 +0,0 @@ | ||||
| # "This is foolishness, what about ...?" | ||||
|  | ||||
|  - Kubernetes | ||||
|      - 👍 Helm charts are available for some key apps already | ||||
|      - 👎 too big -- requires 3rd party tools to run a single-node instance | ||||
|  - Bitnami stacks | ||||
|  - Cloudron | ||||
|      - 👍 Lovely web interface for app, domain & user management | ||||
|      - 👍 Bigger library of apps | ||||
|      - 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth | ||||
|      - 👍 Most apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team | ||||
|      - 👎 Moving away from open source. Free version has a 1-app limit | ||||
|      - 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid for Mediawiki) are a non-starter | ||||
|      - 👎 Difficult to extend apps | ||||
|      - 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu | ||||
|      - 👎 Upstreams aren't involved | ||||
|  - Yunohost | ||||
|      - 👍 Lovely web interface for app, domain & user management | ||||
|      - 👍 Bigger library of apps | ||||
|      - 👍 Awesome backup / deploy / restore continuous integration testing | ||||
|      - 👍 Supports hosting apps in subdirectories as well as subdomains | ||||
|      - 👍 Doesn't require a public-facing IP | ||||
|      - 👎 Upstreams aren't involved | ||||
|      - 👎 Not idempotent: uninstalling apps leaves growing cruft | ||||
|  - Ansible | ||||
|      - 👍 Includes server creation and bootstrapping | ||||
|      - 👎 Upstreams aren't publishing Ansible roles | ||||
|      - 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates | ||||
|  - `docker-compose` | ||||
|      - 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring  | ||||
|      - 👎 Secret storage not available yet | ||||
|      - 👎 [Not recommended](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8) | ||||
|  - Manually installing apps | ||||
|      - 👍 Simple - just follow upstream instructions to install and update | ||||
|      - 👎 Loads of manual work required for app isolation and backups | ||||
|      - 👎 Array of sysadmin skills required to install apps | ||||
|      - 👎 Hard to share configs into the commons | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user