Re-work UI to expose underlying operations #485
Closed
opened 2025-01-15 10:51:09 +00:00 by decentral1se
·
4 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
main
local-integration-testing
renovate/otel-weaver-0.x
renovate/codespell-2.x
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-lipgloss-2.x
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-bubbletea-2.x
renovate/tonistiigi-xx-1.x
renovate/alpine-3.x
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-log-2.x
chore-deps
fix/492
fix/deps
fix/613
0.13.0-beta
0.13.0-rc2-beta
0.13.0-rc1-beta
0.12.0-beta
0.11.0-beta
0.10.1-beta
0.10.0-beta
0.10.0-rc2-beta
0.10.0-rc1-beta
0.9.0-beta
0.8.1-beta
0.8.0-beta
0.8.0-rc2-beta
0.8.0-rc1-beta
0.7.0-beta
0.7.0-rc3-beta
0.7.0-rc2-beta
0.6.0-beta
0.5.1-beta
0.5.0-alpha
0.4.1-alpha
0.4.0-alpha
0.4.0-alpha-rc8
0.4.0-alpha-rc7
0.4.0-alpha-rc6
0.4.0-alpha-rc5
0.4.0-alpha-rc4
0.4.0-alpha-rc3
0.4.0-alpha-rc2
0.4.0-alpha-rc1
0.3.1-alpha-rc2
0.3.1-alpha-rc1
0.3.1-rc1
0.3.0-alpha
0.2.2-alpha
0.2.1-alpha
0.2.0-alpha
0.1.8-alpha
0.1.7-alpha
0.1.6-alpha
0.1.5-alpha
0.1.4-alpha
0.1.3-alpha
0.1.2-alpha
0.1.1-alpha
0.1.0-alpha
10.0.5
10.0.3
10.0.2
10.0.1
10.0.0
9.0.0
8.0.1
8.0.0
0.7.4
0.7.3
0.7.2
0.7.1
0.7.0
checkout
0.6.0
0.5.0
0.4.1
0.4.0
0.3.1
0.3.0
0.2.0
0.1.2
0.1.1
0.1.0
Labels
Clear labels
bug
build
ci/cd
critical fix
design
documentation
duplicate
easy-first-issue
enhancement
help wanted
i10n
i18n
installer
invalid
question
release
release-candidate
security
tech-debt
test
wontfix
Something is not working
go build related issues
Building things with CI/CD
https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/010/
UI/UX
Documenting all the things
This issue or pull request already exists
Something for new people to get stuck into. We hope it's easy!
New feature
Need some help
Everything to do with localisation
Everything to do with internationalisation
Everything to do with the install script.
Something is wrong
More information is needed
Release management
Related to the new release candidate
Security related
Unit/integration testing
This won't be fixed
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
3wordchant
aadil (Aadil Ayub)
abra-bot (Abra Bot)
ammaratef45
amras (Sarma)
Apfelwurm
BornDeleuze
Brooke
carla
cas (Cassowary)
coopcloud
cyrnel
decentral1se (d1)
dede
devydave
fauno (fauno)
iexos
jade (Jade Ambrose)
jjsfunhouse
jmakdah2 (Jackie Makdah)
joe-irving (Joe Irving)
kawaiipunk (KawaiiPunk)
knoflook
kolaente
lambdabundesverband
linnealovespie (April)
moosemower
moritz
notplants
oxaliq (sorrel)
p4u1
pharaohgraphy (Andrew 🐦🔥❤️🔥✴️)
renovate-bot (Comrade Renovate Bot)
ripclap
simon
sixsmith (Sixsmith)
stevensting
trav
val (val (he/him))
yksflip
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: toolshed/abra#485
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
abrais gaining more UI magical powers and@foresthas given a spark of inspiration and some direction in this thread.Today we just dump everything to
--debugand theabraoutput just hangs waiting for stuff to work or fail. That is because we haven't really had a "UI layer" to deal with this stuff.That's changing in #484 and I can see that it would allow you to, in one place in the code "start the UI" then "run the logic" and have "the logic" send back updates to "the UI" to update a list of operations, with indicators of progress and such (e.g. "starting this, running this, finished this").
I wouldn't start such a refactor without more feedback. I won't pick this up now but I think it would be a really great improvement. Leaving this for "another day".
Related: toolshed/organising#657
Re-work UI of underlying operations of `abra`to Re-work UI to expose underlying operationsAmazing idea, think this would the waiting a lot more bearable.
And it might lead to useful bug reports about exactly which steps are timing out for different recipes?
Relevant: #613
One consideration which I realised while doing #687 is that there is a tension between providing text output and interactive output. This was already a debate since the unix philosophy got drafted. I think I'm OK with interactive outputs that just don't deal with pager / text output too well (altho I'd gladly see this improved) as long as we maintain machine-readable output beside it? Any feedback welcome on this.
I'm abandoning any further UI/UX atm. I believe the underlying problem is that the declarative nature of swarm is making it very hard to make a simple/sane UI/UX layer due to the explosion of possible states and faulty reporting from the runtime... I must have tried to make progress on this over 10 times now and without making progress... so, I think we should deprioritise this permanently until The Future ™️ A New Hope being toolshed/organising#682.