feat(deploy): Simplifies deploy overview #508
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "p4u1/abra:fixes"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
50b7ec550a
to3c6b506114
@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ func getDeployVersion(cliArgs []string, deployMeta stack.DeployMeta, app app.App
if err != nil {
return "", "", err
}
// TODO: This seems wrong!?
@decentral1se This seems wrong? Can we just omit CHAOS in the deploy overview?
The VERSION then shows one of the following:
v1.0.0
eebbcc
eebbcc+U
This is all the info we need right? Or am I missing something?
@p4u1 I'm not exactly sure but I think you're right from what you've included. I'd have to see how many tests fail 😂 Sure keep going and see where it leads you?
💕
@ -77,12 +77,6 @@ steps:
wget https://git.coopcloud.tech/toolshed/abra/raw/branch/main/scripts/tests/run-ci-int -O run-ci-int
chmod +x run-ci-int
sh run-ci-int
when:
The test suite runs for like 30 mins, I think this would waste a lot of computing cycles. Also, people push commits to main for stuff that doesn't need testing and forget to put
[ci skip]
. I think this might cause more problems than it solves tbh. Nightly seems to be fine so far? Do you have some other needs here? I think the CI failure is cus the secret which contains the SSH key is locked to only run on the main branch?There are not a lot of pull requests currently so I would really prefer getting direct feedback in my pull request (waiting 30 minutes is not a problem) instead of waiting for the next day and having to remember to look into drone logs.
Maybe as a compromise we could add a special label which triggers integration tests for that pr? Would need some help with that though (never really worked with drone bevore)
Sounds good yeh!
OK, I'll try to wire this up, I can't quite remember what is involved but I'll try to get it done in the next days.
What branch name do you want? @p4u1
So then we do nightly runs and on-demand on a specific branch for quick feedback?
Sorry, I'm just not finding time to do this @p4u1, I would say: please open a ticket so I can come back to this when I have time.
Proposal for new Deploy Overview:
┃ CURRENT DEPLOYMENT ┃
┃ VERSION unknown
┃
┃ ┃
┃ CURRENT ENV ┃
┃ VERSION ff2c04c9+U ┃
┃ ┃
┃ NEW DEPLOYMENT ┃
┃ VERSION 1.0.0 ┃
Then "version" can be:
@decentral1se how do you feel about omitting all those CHAOS fields
Yeh I'm all for it. Nice to simplify here.
7f40394aff
to632d27cc25
632d27cc25
to60ae6091e5
fixesto feat(deploy): Simplifies deploy overview@decentral1se this is ready for review
60ae6091e5
tofe37166733
Great stuff! Hard diff to review, I guess if the integration suite is saying ✅ then I'm good 🙃
We can also see how things go in the RC2.
I'm very short on time, please proceed as you think is best!
(If you don't have time to run the suite yourself, just merge and see what happens)
Ok I merged it, lets hope for green ci tomorrow, but should be fine (I tested most of it locally).