Rework abra recipe release
#682
Closed
opened 2025-10-01 10:49:00 +00:00 by iexos
·
1 comment
No Branch/Tag Specified
main
renovate/golang-1.26
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-lipgloss-2.x
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-bubbletea-2.x
renovate/otel-weaver-0.x
renovate/tonistiigi-xx-1.x
renovate/alpine-3.x
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-log-2.x
chore-deps
fix/492
fix/deps
fix/613
0.13.0-beta
0.13.0-rc2-beta
0.13.0-rc1-beta
0.12.0-beta
0.11.0-beta
0.10.1-beta
0.10.0-beta
0.10.0-rc2-beta
0.10.0-rc1-beta
0.9.0-beta
0.8.1-beta
0.8.0-beta
0.8.0-rc2-beta
0.8.0-rc1-beta
0.7.0-beta
0.7.0-rc3-beta
0.7.0-rc2-beta
0.6.0-beta
0.5.1-beta
0.5.0-alpha
0.4.1-alpha
0.4.0-alpha
0.4.0-alpha-rc8
0.4.0-alpha-rc7
0.4.0-alpha-rc6
0.4.0-alpha-rc5
0.4.0-alpha-rc4
0.4.0-alpha-rc3
0.4.0-alpha-rc2
0.4.0-alpha-rc1
0.3.1-alpha-rc2
0.3.1-alpha-rc1
0.3.1-rc1
0.3.0-alpha
0.2.2-alpha
0.2.1-alpha
0.2.0-alpha
0.1.8-alpha
0.1.7-alpha
0.1.6-alpha
0.1.5-alpha
0.1.4-alpha
0.1.3-alpha
0.1.2-alpha
0.1.1-alpha
0.1.0-alpha
10.0.5
10.0.3
10.0.2
10.0.1
10.0.0
9.0.0
8.0.1
8.0.0
0.7.4
0.7.3
0.7.2
0.7.1
0.7.0
checkout
0.6.0
0.5.0
0.4.1
0.4.0
0.3.1
0.3.0
0.2.0
0.1.2
0.1.1
0.1.0
Labels
Clear labels
bug
build
ci/cd
critical fix
design
documentation
duplicate
easy-first-issue
enhancement
help wanted
i10n
i18n
installer
invalid
question
release
release-candidate
security
tech-debt
test
wontfix
Something is not working
go build related issues
Building things with CI/CD
https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/010/
UI/UX
Documenting all the things
This issue or pull request already exists
Something for new people to get stuck into. We hope it's easy!
New feature
Need some help
Everything to do with localisation
Everything to do with internationalisation
Everything to do with the install script.
Something is wrong
More information is needed
Release management
Related to the new release candidate
Security related
Unit/integration testing
This won't be fixed
No Label
enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Abra v0.13
Assignees
3wordchant
aadil (Aadil Ayub)
abra-bot (Abra Bot)
ammaratef45
amras (Sarma)
Apfelwurm
BornDeleuze
Brooke
carla
cas (Cassowary)
coopcloud
cyrnel
decentral1se (decentral1se)
dede
fauno (fauno)
iexos
jade (Jade Ambrose)
jjsfunhouse
jmakdah2
joe-irving (Joe Irving)
kawaiipunk (KawaiiPunk)
knoflook
kolaente
lambdabundesverband
linnealovespie
moosemower
moritz
notplants
oxaliq (sorrel)
p4u1
pharaohgraphy (Andrew 🐦🔥❤️🔥✴️)
renovate-bot (Comrade Renovate Bot)
ripclap
simon
sixsmith (Sixsmith)
stevensting
trav
val (val (he/him))
yksflip
Clear assignees
No Assignees
iexos
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: toolshed/abra#682
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Following a recent kite-flying session, here is a proposal broken out of #663 for changes to the release command.
This rework shall serve the following purposes:
The proposal is to make the following changes to
abra recipe release:app deploywithout--chaos)recipe sync, i.e. ask for major/minor/patch and add changes to labelrecipe synccommandrecipe release: ask for release notes/pick uprelease/next, create the commit, create the tag--publishflagRegarding the last point, I imagine there was (is?) a good reason that releasing and publishing were separated. Maybe from a time when catalogue generation was less automatic? I assume this separation is not sensible anymore, please tell me if that is not true.
The new workflow for standard upgrades would now require a manual git commit since
recipe upgradeis leaving the working dir modified. To mitigate this, I propose to add smth an option for committing. Only two commands would be needed then, e.g. smth like this:Any comments on this?