Rename abra recipe upgrade
#953
Open
opened 2026-10-17 18:27:33 +00:00 by iexos
·
3 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
main
fix/492
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-bubbletea-2.x
renovate/golang-1.27
renovate/codespell-2.x
renovate/tonistiigi-xx-1.x
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-log-2.x
renovate/alpine-3.x
feat/container-labels
renovate/github.com-charmbracelet-lipgloss-2.x
chore-deps
fix/deps
fix/613
0.13.0-beta
0.13.0-rc2-beta
0.13.0-rc1-beta
0.12.0-beta
0.11.0-beta
0.10.1-beta
0.10.0-beta
0.10.0-rc2-beta
0.10.0-rc1-beta
0.9.0-beta
0.8.1-beta
0.8.0-beta
0.8.0-rc2-beta
0.8.0-rc1-beta
0.7.0-beta
0.7.0-rc3-beta
0.7.0-rc2-beta
0.6.0-beta
0.5.1-beta
0.5.0-alpha
0.4.1-alpha
0.4.0-alpha
0.4.0-alpha-rc8
0.4.0-alpha-rc7
0.4.0-alpha-rc6
0.4.0-alpha-rc5
0.4.0-alpha-rc4
0.4.0-alpha-rc3
0.4.0-alpha-rc2
0.4.0-alpha-rc1
0.3.1-alpha-rc2
0.3.1-alpha-rc1
0.3.1-rc1
0.3.0-alpha
0.2.2-alpha
0.2.1-alpha
0.2.0-alpha
0.1.8-alpha
0.1.7-alpha
0.1.6-alpha
0.1.5-alpha
0.1.4-alpha
0.1.3-alpha
0.1.2-alpha
0.1.1-alpha
0.1.0-alpha
10.0.5
10.0.3
10.0.2
10.0.1
10.0.0
9.0.0
8.0.1
8.0.0
0.7.4
0.7.3
0.7.2
0.7.1
0.7.0
checkout
0.6.0
0.5.0
0.4.1
0.4.0
0.3.1
0.3.0
0.2.0
0.1.2
0.1.1
0.1.0
Labels
Clear labels
bug
build
ci/cd
critical fix
design
documentation
duplicate
easy-first-issue
enhancement
help wanted
i10n
i18n
installer
invalid
question
release
release-candidate
security
tech-debt
test
wontfix
Something is not working
go build related issues
Building things with CI/CD
https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/010/
UI/UX
Documenting all the things
This issue or pull request already exists
Something for new people to get stuck into. We hope it's easy!
New feature
Need some help
Everything to do with localisation
Everything to do with internationalisation
Everything to do with the install script.
Something is wrong
More information is needed
Release management
Related to the new release candidate
Security related
Unit/integration testing
This won't be fixed
No labels
enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
3wordchant
aadil (Aadil Ayub)
abra-bot (Abra Bot)
ammaratef45
amras (Sarma)
Apfelwurm
BornDeleuze (Born Deleuze)
Brooke
carla
cas (Cassowary)
coopcloud
cyrnel
dannygroenewegen (Danny Groenewegen)
decentral1se (d1)
dede
devydave
fauno (fauno)
hex (Josh Dukes)
iexos
jade (Jade Ambrose)
jjsfunhouse
jmakdah2 (Jackie Makdah)
joe-irving (Joe Irving)
kawaiipunk (KawaiiPunk)
knoflook
kolaente
lambdabundesverband
linnealovespie (April)
moosemower
moritz
notplants
oxaliq (sorrel)
p4u1 (p4u1)
pharaohgraphy (Andrew 🐦🔥❤️🔥✴️)
renovate-bot (Comrade Renovate Bot)
ripclap
simon
sixsmith (Sixsmith)
stevensting (stevensting)
trav (Trav Fryer)
val (val (he/him))
yksflip
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: toolshed/abra#953
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
There is still confusion with the recipe upgrade workflow. One thing we can do about it is of course better documentation. Another though is that the different purposes of
recipe upgradeandrecipe releasearen't immediately obvious.I suggest we rename
recipe upgradeto something which clarifies its purpose, e.g.:abra recipe upgrade-imagesabra recipe upgrade-image-tagsabra recipe fetch-image-tagsYou get the idea, naming suggestions welcome :)
What kind of confusion? Do you have quotes or links?
Renames need to have wide agreement with a consensus that it will improve the situation beforehand. Otherwise, you risk going into the exact same problem you had before with a new group of people who are confused.
Btw, you can patch
abrawith a synonym onupgradewhich maintains backwards compatibility withupgradewhile allowing$whatever_elseif you want to test stuff out practically.Hm just some general comments in chat that made me think about my initial confusion. Its more of an idea how to make things more clear as
upgradefeels ambiguous in this context. And it might not be worth the trouble... So its fine for me to close this.Let's keep it open and see where the conversation goes.
"The refactoring will continue until moral improves"
😆