toolshed/docker-cli
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update typos and style in docs

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: David Karlsson <35727626+dvdksn@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Craig Osterhout <craig.osterhout@docker.com>
This commit is contained in:
Craig Osterhout
2023-12-13 15:06:16 -08:00
committed by Sebastiaan van Stijn
parent 5ba998d6b4
commit 5eac07b103
31 changed files with 110 additions and 106 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
docs/reference/commandline/image_prune.md
View File

@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Remove unused images
## Description
Remove all dangling images. If `-a` is specified, will also remove all images not referenced by any container.
Remove all dangling images. If `-a` is specified, also remove all images not referenced by any container.
## Examples
@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ images without the specified labels.
> same filtering syntax to see which images match your filter.
>
> However, if you are using negative filtering (testing for the absence of a
> label or that a label does *not* have a specific value), this type of filter
> does not work with `docker image ls` so you cannot easily predict which images
> label or that a label doesn't have a specific value), this type of filter
> doesn't work with `docker image ls` so you cannot easily predict which images
> will be removed. In addition, the confirmation prompt for `docker image prune`
> always warns that *all* dangling images will be removed, even if you are using
> always warns that all dangling images will be removed, even if you are using
> `--filter`.
The following removes images created before `2017-01-04T00:00:00`:
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ $ docker image prune --filter="label!=maintainer=john"
>
> You are prompted for confirmation before the `prune` removes
> anything, but you are not shown a list of what will potentially be removed.
> In addition, `docker image ls` does not support negative filtering, so it
> In addition, `docker image ls` doesn't support negative filtering, so it
> difficult to predict what images will actually be removed.
## Related commands