`Mounts` allows users to specify in a much safer way the volumes they
want to use in the container.
This replaces `Binds` and `Volumes`, which both still exist, but
`Mounts` and `Binds`/`Volumes` are exclussive.
The CLI will continue to use `Binds` and `Volumes` due to concerns with
parsing the volume specs on the client side and cross-platform support
(for now).
The new API follows exactly the services mount API.
Example usage of `Mounts`:
```
$ curl -XPOST localhost:2375/containers/create -d '{
"Image": "alpine:latest",
"HostConfig": {
"Mounts": [{
"Type": "Volume",
"Target": "/foo"
},{
"Type": "bind",
"Source": "/var/run/docker.sock",
"Target": "/var/run/docker.sock",
},{
"Type": "volume",
"Name": "important_data",
"Target": "/var/data",
"ReadOnly": true,
"VolumeOptions": {
"DriverConfig": {
Name: "awesomeStorage",
Options: {"size": "10m"},
Labels: {"some":"label"}
}
}]
}
}'
```
There are currently 2 types of mounts:
- **bind**: Paths on the host that get mounted into the
container. Paths must exist prior to creating the container.
- **volume**: Volumes that persist after the
container is removed.
Not all fields are available in each type, and validation is done to
ensure these fields aren't mixed up between types.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: fc7b904dced4d18d49c8a6c47ae3f415d16d0c43
Component: engine
This moves the types for the `engine-api` repo to the existing types
package.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 91e197d614547f0202e6ae9b8a24d88ee131d950
Component: engine
As described in our ROADMAP.md, introduce new Swarm management API
endpoints relying on swarmkit to deploy services. It currently vendors
docker/engine-api changes.
This PR is fully backward compatible (joining a Swarm is an optional
feature of the Engine, and existing commands are not impacted).
Signed-off-by: Tonis Tiigi <tonistiigi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Vieux <vieux@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Jana Radhakrishnan <mrjana@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Madhu Venugopal <madhu@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 534a90a99367af6f6bba1ddcc7eb07506e41f774
Component: engine
So other packages don't need to import the daemon package when they
want to use this struct.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tibor Vass <tibor@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 6bb0d1816acd8d4f7a542a6aac047da2b874f476
Component: engine
Leaving only one versioned main function that a backend must implement.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 38abba9e2c8f7ac27bd26bf98685b51585922317
Component: engine
Although having a request ID available throughout the codebase is very
valuable, the impact of requiring a Context as an argument to every
function in the codepath of an API request, is too significant and was
not properly understood at the time of the review.
Furthermore, mixing API-layer code with non-API-layer code makes the
latter usable only by API-layer code (one that has a notion of Context).
This reverts commit de4164043546d2b9ee3bf323dbc41f4979c84480, reversing
changes made to 7daeecd42d7bb112bfe01532c8c9a962bb0c7967.
Signed-off-by: Tibor Vass <tibor@docker.com>
Conflicts:
api/server/container.go
builder/internals.go
daemon/container_unix.go
daemon/create.go
Upstream-commit: b08f071e18043abe8ce15f56826d38dd26bedb78
Component: engine
This PR adds a "request ID" to each event generated, the 'docker events'
stream now looks like this:
```
2015-09-10T15:02:50.000000000-07:00 [reqid: c01e3534ddca] de7c5d4ca927253cf4e978ee9c4545161e406e9b5a14617efb52c658b249174a: (from ubuntu) create
```
Note the `[reqID: c01e3534ddca]` part, that's new.
Each HTTP request will generate its own unique ID. So, if you do a
`docker build` you'll see a series of events all with the same reqID.
This allow for log processing tools to determine which events are all related
to the same http request.
I didn't propigate the context to all possible funcs in the daemon,
I decided to just do the ones that needed it in order to get the reqID
into the events. I'd like to have people review this direction first, and
if we're ok with it then I'll make sure we're consistent about when
we pass around the context - IOW, make sure that all funcs at the same level
have a context passed in even if they don't call the log funcs - this will
ensure we're consistent w/o passing it around for all calls unnecessarily.
ping @icecrime @calavera @crosbymichael
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Upstream-commit: 26b1064967d9fcefd4c35f60e96bf6d7c9a3b5f8
Component: engine
