Signed-off-by: Ke Li <kel@splunk.com>
Add missing changes
Signed-off-by: Ke Li <kel@splunk.com>
User errors.New to create error
Signed-off-by: Ke Li <kel@splunk.com>
Upstream-commit: 514adcf4580effa4820be8d5e6d2c0ea9825ceb2
Component: engine
This fix tries to address issue raised in #23973 where the
`docker rename` does not update namedIndex and linkIndex,
thus resulting in failures when the linked containers are
referenced later on.
This fix updates the namedIndex and linkIndex during the
`docker rename` and fixes the issue.
An integration test has been added to cover the changes
in this fix.
This fix fixes#23973.
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
Upstream-commit: 3f6e3a0885124a00c7f915af8f9181e6a275d828
Component: engine
During the renaming of a container, no need to call `container.Lock()`
if `oldName == newName`.
This is a follow-up from #23360 (commit 88d1ee6c112d980a63c625389524047fea32e6d9)
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
Upstream-commit: 7e1ec8d2bd6d1aa77f824a1a4d717a7aa4cc3459
Component: engine
Moving all strings to the errors package wasn't a good idea after all.
Our custom implementation of Go errors predates everything that's nice
and good about working with errors in Go. Take as an example what we
have to do to get an error message:
```go
func GetErrorMessage(err error) string {
switch err.(type) {
case errcode.Error:
e, _ := err.(errcode.Error)
return e.Message
case errcode.ErrorCode:
ec, _ := err.(errcode.ErrorCode)
return ec.Message()
default:
return err.Error()
}
}
```
This goes against every good practice for Go development. The language already provides a simple, intuitive and standard way to get error messages, that is calling the `Error()` method from an error. Reinventing the error interface is a mistake.
Our custom implementation also makes very hard to reason about errors, another nice thing about Go. I found several (>10) error declarations that we don't use anywhere. This is a clear sign about how little we know about the errors we return. I also found several error usages where the number of arguments was different than the parameters declared in the error, another clear example of how difficult is to reason about errors.
Moreover, our custom implementation didn't really make easier for people to return custom HTTP status code depending on the errors. Again, it's hard to reason about when to set custom codes and how. Take an example what we have to do to extract the message and status code from an error before returning a response from the API:
```go
switch err.(type) {
case errcode.ErrorCode:
daError, _ := err.(errcode.ErrorCode)
statusCode = daError.Descriptor().HTTPStatusCode
errMsg = daError.Message()
case errcode.Error:
// For reference, if you're looking for a particular error
// then you can do something like :
// import ( derr "github.com/docker/docker/errors" )
// if daError.ErrorCode() == derr.ErrorCodeNoSuchContainer { ... }
daError, _ := err.(errcode.Error)
statusCode = daError.ErrorCode().Descriptor().HTTPStatusCode
errMsg = daError.Message
default:
// This part of will be removed once we've
// converted everything over to use the errcode package
// FIXME: this is brittle and should not be necessary.
// If we need to differentiate between different possible error types,
// we should create appropriate error types with clearly defined meaning
errStr := strings.ToLower(err.Error())
for keyword, status := range map[string]int{
"not found": http.StatusNotFound,
"no such": http.StatusNotFound,
"bad parameter": http.StatusBadRequest,
"conflict": http.StatusConflict,
"impossible": http.StatusNotAcceptable,
"wrong login/password": http.StatusUnauthorized,
"hasn't been activated": http.StatusForbidden,
} {
if strings.Contains(errStr, keyword) {
statusCode = status
break
}
}
}
```
You can notice two things in that code:
1. We have to explain how errors work, because our implementation goes against how easy to use Go errors are.
2. At no moment we arrived to remove that `switch` statement that was the original reason to use our custom implementation.
This change removes all our status errors from the errors package and puts them back in their specific contexts.
IT puts the messages back with their contexts. That way, we know right away when errors used and how to generate their messages.
It uses custom interfaces to reason about errors. Errors that need to response with a custom status code MUST implementent this simple interface:
```go
type errorWithStatus interface {
HTTPErrorStatusCode() int
}
```
This interface is very straightforward to implement. It also preserves Go errors real behavior, getting the message is as simple as using the `Error()` method.
I included helper functions to generate errors that use custom status code in `errors/errors.go`.
By doing this, we remove the hard dependency we have eeverywhere to our custom errors package. Yes, you can use it as a helper to generate error, but it's still very easy to generate errors without it.
Please, read this fantastic blog post about errors in Go: http://dave.cheney.net/2014/12/24/inspecting-errors
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: a793564b2591035aec5412fbcbcccf220c773a4c
Component: engine
Don't rely on sqlite db for name registration and linking.
Instead register names and links when the daemon starts to an in-memory
store.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 0f9f99500c40f2a46682967ca358cd2346fd5e13
Component: engine
This is more aligned with `Daemon.GetImage` and less confusing.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: d7d512bb927023b76c3c01f54a3655ee7c341637
Component: engine
So other packages don't need to import the daemon package when they
want to use this struct.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tibor Vass <tibor@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 6bb0d1816acd8d4f7a542a6aac047da2b874f476
Component: engine
Create a supervisor interface to let the container monitor to emit events.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: ca5ede2d0a23cb84cac3b863c363d0269e6438df
Component: engine
Although having a request ID available throughout the codebase is very
valuable, the impact of requiring a Context as an argument to every
function in the codepath of an API request, is too significant and was
not properly understood at the time of the review.
Furthermore, mixing API-layer code with non-API-layer code makes the
latter usable only by API-layer code (one that has a notion of Context).
This reverts commit de4164043546d2b9ee3bf323dbc41f4979c84480, reversing
changes made to 7daeecd42d7bb112bfe01532c8c9a962bb0c7967.
Signed-off-by: Tibor Vass <tibor@docker.com>
Conflicts:
api/server/container.go
builder/internals.go
daemon/container_unix.go
daemon/create.go
Upstream-commit: b08f071e18043abe8ce15f56826d38dd26bedb78
Component: engine
This PR adds a "request ID" to each event generated, the 'docker events'
stream now looks like this:
```
2015-09-10T15:02:50.000000000-07:00 [reqid: c01e3534ddca] de7c5d4ca927253cf4e978ee9c4545161e406e9b5a14617efb52c658b249174a: (from ubuntu) create
```
Note the `[reqID: c01e3534ddca]` part, that's new.
Each HTTP request will generate its own unique ID. So, if you do a
`docker build` you'll see a series of events all with the same reqID.
This allow for log processing tools to determine which events are all related
to the same http request.
I didn't propigate the context to all possible funcs in the daemon,
I decided to just do the ones that needed it in order to get the reqID
into the events. I'd like to have people review this direction first, and
if we're ok with it then I'll make sure we're consistent about when
we pass around the context - IOW, make sure that all funcs at the same level
have a context passed in even if they don't call the log funcs - this will
ensure we're consistent w/o passing it around for all calls unnecessarily.
ping @icecrime @calavera @crosbymichael
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Upstream-commit: 26b1064967d9fcefd4c35f60e96bf6d7c9a3b5f8
Component: engine
`docker rename foo ''` would result in:
```
usage: docker rename OLD_NAME NEW_NAME
```
which is the old engine's way of return errors - yes that's in the
daemon code. So I fixed that error msg to just be normal.
While doing that I noticed that using an empty string for the
source container name failed but didn't print any error message at all.
This is because we would generate a URL like: ../containers//rename/..
which would cause a 301 redirect to ../containers/rename/..
however the CLI code doesn't actually deal with 301's - it just ignores
them and returns back to the CLI code/caller.
Rather than changing the CLI to deal with 3xx error codes, which would
probably be a good thing to do in a follow-on PR, for this immediate
issue I just added a cli-side check for empty strings for both old and
new names. This way we catch it even before we hit the daemon.
API callers will get a 404, assuming they follow the 301, for the
case of the src being empty, and the new error msg when the destination
is empty - so we should be good now.
Add tests for both cases too.
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Upstream-commit: 848792c42e61070adc4107a39d6a044e2ed615f7
Component: engine
- some method names were changed to have a 'Locking' suffix, as the
downcased versions already existed, and the existing functions simply
had locks around the already downcased version.
- deleting unused functions
- package comment
- magic numbers replaced by golang constants
- comments all over
Signed-off-by: Morgan Bauer <mbauer@us.ibm.com>
Upstream-commit: abd72d4008dde7ee8249170d49eb4bc963c51e24
Component: engine
Move some calls to container.LogEvent down lower so that there's
less of a chance of them being missed. Also add a few more events
that appear to have been missed.
Added testcases for new events: commit, copy, resize, attach, rename, top
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Upstream-commit: 8232312c1e705753d3db82dca3d9bb23e59c3b52
Component: engine
A part of ISSUE#12151-Remove engine.Job mechanism
Signed-off-by: Hu Keping <hukeping@huawei.com>
Upstream-commit: 49c4de4aebe0ecc3005e56a9ab06b5e43f5b312c
Component: engine
Fixes#11315
After rename occured the graphdb was updated but the container struct
was never commited back to disk, so on daemon restart it loads the old
name again.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: c5c72cf151b21482b2f27417322342c6d781108c
Component: engine
