For obvious reasons that it is not really supported now.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 5a9b5f10cf967f31f0856871ad08f9a0286b4a46
Component: engine
I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 6052f2b3969feadb01662d8e2f30337d9c7f61af
Component: engine
This also moves some cli specific in `cmd/dockerd` as it does not
really belong to the `daemon/config` package.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
Upstream-commit: db63f9370e26d725357c703cbaf9ab63cc7b6d0a
Component: engine
Daniel Nephin
Yong Tang
Michael Crosby
Aaron Lehmann
Vincent Demeester