Since the certificate may be renewed multiple times, this check is
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 2b5ef9bfef0eed60356e2af3230b3b5bd782db2b
Component: engine
This does some minor fix-ups in the CLI reference
for "history", and copies the formattting section to
the man-pages.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Upstream-commit: 2e63c759a264cac09a37ff7f154014038289ca98
Component: engine
This test appears to trigger HTTP requests to "example.com", which may
explain why it is not behaving consistently. This changes it to use an
internal HTTP server to avoid unexpected behavior caused by firewalls or
proxies.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: b483e4f09c128c2fabf82f787c0cf737c17c9c10
Component: engine
I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 6029def4cb
Component: cli
I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 50e74272d1
Component: cli
I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 6052f2b3969feadb01662d8e2f30337d9c7f61af
Component: engine
I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 7059a96e2e
Component: cli
It was possible to see output like this:
"UpdateStatus": {
"State": "updating",
"StartedAt": "2017-04-14T17:10:03.226607162Z",
"CompletedAt": "1970-01-01T00:00:00Z",
"Message": "update in progress"
}
The timestamp fields were already changed to pointers, and left nil if
the timestamp value was zero. However the zero-value of a timestamp from
gRPC is different from the value Go considers to be zero. gRPC uses the
Unix epoch instead of Go's epoch. Therefore, check that the timestamp
does not match the Unix epoch.
Also, add " ago" to the timestamps as shown in "docker service inspect
--pretty", as they are shown as relative times.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 5b855515e4
Component: cli
It was possible to see output like this:
"UpdateStatus": {
"State": "updating",
"StartedAt": "2017-04-14T17:10:03.226607162Z",
"CompletedAt": "1970-01-01T00:00:00Z",
"Message": "update in progress"
}
The timestamp fields were already changed to pointers, and left nil if
the timestamp value was zero. However the zero-value of a timestamp from
gRPC is different from the value Go considers to be zero. gRPC uses the
Unix epoch instead of Go's epoch. Therefore, check that the timestamp
does not match the Unix epoch.
Also, add " ago" to the timestamps as shown in "docker service inspect
--pretty", as they are shown as relative times.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 8a27758364a151d9497cbb507463e81898579c37
Component: engine
These replace `wait*` functions from `docker_utils_test.go` and work
more or less like other `cli` functions.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
Upstream-commit: db35c2a5a8d93cfeac9e75a3add60ae7c64a5856
Component: engine
Daniel Nephin
Jean-Pierre Huynh
Victor Vieux
Tibor Vass
Harald Albers
Boaz Shuster
Vincent Demeester
Tõnis Tiigi
Daniel Nephin
Darren Stahl
allencloud
Aaron Lehmann
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Colin Hebert