From 59b49ef46216619606f105fa36c6b742820af981 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: f Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:48:46 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] wip: resolution 047 --- docs/federation/resolutions/draft/047.md | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/federation/resolutions/draft/047.md diff --git a/docs/federation/resolutions/draft/047.md b/docs/federation/resolutions/draft/047.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f29a63f --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/federation/resolutions/draft/047.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +--- +title: "Resolution 047: Moratorium on LLM use and discussion" +--- + +- Topic: Moratorium on LLM use and discussion +- Date: TBD +- Deadline: 2 weeks after voting starts +- Size: medium + +### History + +Discussion about LLM use or ban have been appearing on the Federation's +Matrix rooms. Also git.coopcloud.tech has been receiving LLM-assisted +pull requests on recipes. + +Members' and contributors' stances around LLM use are split, and there +are valid fears of having a split because of it. + +Federation members 3wc, ammar and maren have been following these +threads and preparing a process to allow us to reach a consensus around +an AI policy for the Coopcloud Federation. + +The process has been proposed and collective steps towards following it +are taking place. Any discussion outside this process only contributes +to draining folks' energy. + +### Proposal + +Self-impose a moratorium on LLM discussion on Federation's Matrix rooms +and Git issues, to direct energies towards the process of establishing +a consensus and an AI policy. + +LLM-assisted pull requests on more complex tools like `abra` are also +within the moratorium, and will be put on hold until the AI policy is +stablished. + +As for LLM-assisted pull requests, they should be clearly marked as +such, and within each recipe maintainers' purview to accept or reject +them. This is because recipes with maintainers already have human +review before merging. -- 2.54.0