wykwit/docs.coopcloud.tech
0
0
Fork 0
forked from toolshed/docs.coopcloud.tech
Code Pull Requests Activity

fix: point formatting in faq

Browse Source 
- capitalize first letter for each point
- finish all the points with a dot
- add one point to 'Pros' for Docker-compose
- move 'Cons' for Docker-compose into appropriate section
This commit is contained in:
Wiktor 2023-11-03 06:54:12 +01:00
parent eb24873db3
commit 792efd9f31
1 changed files with 21 additions and 17 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

38
docs/intro/faq.md
View File

@ -14,21 +14,21 @@ The project was started by workers at [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone/) which
#### Pros #### Pros
- 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling - 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling.
- 👍 Extremely modular - 👍 Extremely modular.
- 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos - 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos.
- 👍 Focussed on hosting providers - 👍 Focussed on hosting providers.
- 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging) - 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging).
- 👍 Now and always libre software - 👍 Now and always libre software.
- 👍 Command line focussed - 👍 Command line focussed.
- 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling - 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling.
#### Cons #### Cons
- 👎 Still a very young project - 👎 Still a very young project.
- 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps - 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps.
- 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use - 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use.
- 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more) - 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more).
## Why start another project? ## Why start another project?
@ -53,16 +53,16 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n
- 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management. - 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management.
- 👍 Large library of apps. - 👍 Large library of apps.
- 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth. - 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth.
- 👍 apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team. - 👍 Apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team.
#### Cons #### Cons
- 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software. - 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software.
- 👎 libre tier has a single app limit. - 👎 Libre tier has a single app limit.
- 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid visual editor for Mediawiki) are a non-starter. - 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid visual editor for Mediawiki) are a non-starter.
- 👎 Difficult to extend apps. - 👎 Difficult to extend apps.
- 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu LTS. - 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu LTS.
- 👎 Upstreams libre software communities aren't involved in packaging. - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling. - 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user. - 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user.
- 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps. - 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps.
@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n
#### Cons #### Cons
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles - 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles.
- 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates - 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates.
### Kubernetes ### Kubernetes
@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n
#### Pros #### Pros
- 👍 Quick to set up and familiar for many developers.
#### Cons
- 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring. - 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring.
- 👎 Secret storage not available yet. - 👎 Secret storage not available yet.
- 👎 [Swarm is the new best practice](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8#issuecomment-367575011). - 👎 [Swarm is the new best practice](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8#issuecomment-367575011).