codegod100
  • Joined on 2023-02-11
codegod100 commented on pull request toolshed/abra#278 2023-02-17 08:30:04 +00:00
Adding server prune and undeploy prune

all changes fixed

codegod100 pushed to prune at codegod100/abra 2023-02-17 08:24:37 +00:00
0d8191bc3e review cleanups
codegod100 commented on pull request toolshed/abra#278 2023-02-17 07:47:52 +00:00
Adding server prune and undeploy prune

I'm kinda confused what you mean here. What are those false,false args being passed to Filters()?

codegod100 commented on pull request toolshed/abra#278 2023-02-15 09:27:35 +00:00
Adding server prune and undeploy prune

this part? it is run even if Action() panics The issue I was trying to tackle is that pruning while docker container is still running is kinda pointless. when we run abra app undeploy It…

codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-15 04:28:40 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle

I undeployed an app with secrets and did a system prune and verified that all images and containers relating to it were gone and then redeployed and the secrets still worked. I'll keep my eye on…

codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-15 03:15:11 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle

I haven't really messed with docker secrets because my primary development app doesn't use secrets. If this is the case it's definitely good to be mindful of. I'll look into it.

codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-15 03:11:05 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle

I'm pretty sure docker system prune doesn't touch secrets unless I'm misunderstanding you.

image

codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-15 03:09:18 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle

I found an open ticket about possibly pruning secrets in the future https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/38007

codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-15 02:56:16 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle

I'm pretty sure there is no prune functionality for docker secrets maybe it was coop-cloud/organising#405 ?

codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-15 02:48:14 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle

@mayel currently it doesn't remove secrets. Is that something I should add? Right now I'm calling the built in prune commands on the docker client. "Pruning" secrets is kind of a non-concept. I…

codegod100 commented on pull request toolshed/abra#278 2023-02-15 02:32:06 +00:00
Adding server prune and undeploy prune

#417

codegod100 created pull request toolshed/abra#278 2023-02-15 02:30:57 +00:00
Adding server prune and undeploy prune #417
codegod100 created branch prune in codegod100/abra 2023-02-15 02:28:10 +00:00
codegod100 pushed to prune at codegod100/abra 2023-02-15 02:28:10 +00:00
20cdfe7a72 Adding server prune and undeploy prune
codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-15 00:10:34 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle

Should this be abara server prune <server name> there is currently no system command and I don't know if a datapoint of 1 is justifcation for a new sub command?

codegod100 pushed to main at toolshed/abra 2023-02-14 13:59:46 +00:00
d619f399e7 Update 'cli/app/undeploy.go'
codegod100 created repository codegod100/abra 2023-02-14 13:48:54 +00:00
codegod100 opened issue toolshed/organising#417 2023-02-14 13:30:12 +00:00
add a docker system prune with configurable options to undeploy step of lifecycle
codegod100 closed issue toolshed/organising#415 2023-02-13 10:19:30 +00:00
App deployed but not displaying when I visit url
codegod100 commented on issue toolshed/organising#412 2023-02-13 08:29:03 +00:00
error while deploying traefik on new server

is traefik supposed to be serving a web app on the reaefik app domain in addition to routing traffic? If it is, then it is failingto do its job and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong