Adding server prune and undeploy prune #278
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "codegod100/abra:prune"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
coop-cloud/organising#417
Adding server prune and undeploy prune #417to Adding server prune and undeploy pruneThis is amazing, great stuff!
@ -14,0 +18,4 @@var pruneFlag = &cli.BoolFlag{Name: "prune, p",Destination: &prune,Usage: "Prunes unused containers, networks, and dangling images for stack",stack👉an app@ -57,5 +67,39 @@ volumes as eligiblef or pruning once undeployed.return nil},After: func(c *cli.Context) error {Hmmm, I'm not sure we should be putting this in
Afteras it has some not obvious runtime behaviour (see https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/urfave/cli/v2#AfterFunc) and also the--pruneis part of the normal functioning of the sub-command, not a thing to happen after execution? Perhaps abstracting to a function and calling from the mainAction?this part?
it is run even if Action() panicsThe issue I was trying to tackle is that pruning while docker container is still running is kinda pointless. when we run
abra app undeployIt takes clock time for the container to spin down. maybe we put an arbitrary wait in there? I hate doing that but not sure another way since we are done talking to docker by the time the actual spindown happens.Aha, I see. Could you just poll every second for the stack until it goes away? Then you can drop into the pruning logic after and still keep it all in the main
Actioncode path.@ -60,0 +79,4 @@}ctx := context.Background()pruneFilters := filters.NewArgs()Could this be tucked into
app.Filters? You might need to add a flag to specify the*logic? Would be then:Could potentially learn from the new
runtimepackage options praxis 🤔 For another day...I'm kinda confused what you mean here. What are those
false,falseargs being passed toFilters()?Yeh it's kinda a mess not of our making, i'll copy in the comments:
Filtersgoal was to hide away the weirdness. But I see now again that the function arguments are also confusing. Anyway, feel free to skip this for now and I can loop back after for a re-factor.@ -60,0 +84,4 @@pruneFilters.Add("label", stackSearch)cr, err := cl.ContainersPrune(ctx, pruneFilters)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)@ -60,0 +90,4 @@nr, err := cl.NetworksPrune(ctx, pruneFilters)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)@ -60,0 +96,4 @@ir, err := cl.ImagesPrune(ctx, pruneFilters)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)@ -0,0 +30,4 @@Name: "prune",Aliases: []string{"p"},Usage: "Prune a managed server; Runs a docker system prune",Description: `Could be a
"..."oneliner after all?@ -0,0 +47,4 @@cl, err := client.New(serverName)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)@ -0,0 +52,4 @@ctx := context.Background()cr, err := cl.ContainersPrune(ctx, args)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)@ -0,0 +58,4 @@nr, err := cl.NetworksPrune(ctx, args)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)@ -0,0 +68,4 @@}ir, err := cl.ImagesPrune(ctx, pruneFilters)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)@ -0,0 +75,4 @@if volunesFilter {vr, err := cl.VolumesPrune(ctx, args)if err != nil {return errlogrus.Fatal(err)all changes fixed