daniel
/
docs.coopcloud.tech
forked from coop-cloud/docs.coopcloud.tech
0
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Activity

fix: point formatting in faq 

- capitalize first letter for each point
- finish all the points with a dot
- add one point to 'Pros' for Docker-compose
- move 'Cons' for Docker-compose into appropriate section
This commit is contained in:
Wiktor W. 2023-11-03 07:29:16 +01:00 committed by wykwit
parent 7523339384
commit e986eb48da
1 changed files with 21 additions and 17 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

38
docs/intro/faq.md
View File

@ -14,21 +14,21 @@ The project was started by workers at [Autonomic](https://autonomic.zone/) which
#### Pros
- 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling
- 👍 Extremely modular
- 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos
- 👍 Focussed on hosting providers
- 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging)
- 👍 Now and always libre software
- 👍 Command line focussed
- 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling
- 👍 Thin "ease of use" layer on top of already standardised tooling.
- 👍 Extremely modular.
- 👍 Collective commons based configuration via public git repos.
- 👍 Focussed on hosting providers.
- 👍 Uses upstream published containers (no duplication on packaging).
- 👍 Now and always libre software.
- 👍 Command line focussed.
- 👍 Horizontal and vertical scaling.
#### Cons
- 👎 Still a very young project
- 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps
- 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use
- 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more)
- 👎 Still a very young project.
- 👎 Limited availability of well tested apps.
- 👎 Requires command line knowledge to use.
- 👎 Currently x86 only (see [this FAQ question](#why-only-x86-support) for more).
## Why start another project?
@ -53,16 +53,16 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n
- 👍 Decent web interface for app, domain & user management.
- 👍 Large library of apps.
- 👍 Built-in SSO using LDAP, which is compatible with more apps and often has a better user interface than OAuth.
- 👍 apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team.
- 👍 Apps are actively maintained by the Cloudron team.
#### Cons
- 👎 Moving away from open source. The core is now proprietary software.
- 👎 libre tier has a single app limit.
- 👎 Libre tier has a single app limit.
- 👎 Based on Docker images, not stacks, so multi-process apps (e.g. parsoid visual editor for Mediawiki) are a non-starter.
- 👎 Difficult to extend apps.
- 👎 Only supported on Ubuntu LTS.
- 👎 Upstreams libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't involved in packaging.
- 👎 Limited to vertical scaling.
- 👎 Tension between needs of hosting provider and non-technical user.
- 👎 LDAP introduces security problems - one vulnerable app can expose a user's password for all apps.
@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n
#### Cons
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles
- 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates
- 👎 Upstream libre software communities aren't publishing Ansible roles.
- 👎 Lots of manual work involved in things like app isolation, backups, updates.
### Kubernetes
@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ Here is a short overview of the pros/cons we see, in relation to our goals and n
#### Pros
- 👍 Quick to set up and familiar for many developers.
#### Cons
- 👎 Manual work required for process monitoring.
- 👎 Secret storage not available yet.
- 👎 [Swarm is the new best practice](https://github.com/BretFisher/ama/issues/8#issuecomment-367575011).