mirror of
https://github.com/fsecada01/Pygentic-AI.git
synced 2026-05-12 04:04:57 +00:00
Created TEST_COVERAGE_GAPS.md documenting areas needing test coverage. Organized by priority with specific test suggestions for each gap. High Priority Gaps: - E2E test for complete analysis flow (form → celery → status → result → PDF) - AI agent testing (SWOT generation, tool use, error handling) - Input validation/sanitization (SQL injection, XSS, SSRF) - PDF cache memory limits (no eviction policy currently) - Dependency security scanning (4 high-severity vulnerabilities) Medium Priority Gaps: - Database operations (persistence, migrations, transactions) - HTMX OOB swap DOM validation (verify correct structure) - Load testing (concurrency, memory leaks, queue saturation) - PDF security (size limits, timeouts, content sanitization) - Deployment validation (Docker build, env vars, health checks) Low Priority Gaps: - Frontend Jinjax component testing - Cross-browser compatibility - Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance) - Logging and error tracking - Test data fixtures For each gap, document includes: - Description of the gap - Current coverage status - Specific test suggestions - Priority and effort estimates Ready to convert to GitHub issues using provided template. Current Coverage: ~15% Target Coverage: 80% Critical Path Target: 95% Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
421 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
421 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Test Coverage Gaps - StrategIQ
|
|
|
|
This document outlines areas that need additional test coverage. Each section should be converted to a GitHub issue for tracking.
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 High Priority - Critical Path
|
|
|
|
### Issue: E2E Test for Complete Analysis Flow
|
|
**Priority**: High
|
|
**Effort**: Medium
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
Need end-to-end test that covers the complete workflow:
|
|
1. User submits analysis form
|
|
2. Background Celery task processes analysis
|
|
3. Status updates via HTMX polling
|
|
4. Final SWOT results rendered
|
|
5. PDF download triggered
|
|
|
|
**Current Coverage**: Individual endpoints tested, but not full integration
|
|
**Gap**: No test covering Celery worker, real AI agent execution, complete flow
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_complete_analysis_workflow_e2e()` - Mock AI agent, verify full flow
|
|
- `test_analysis_with_real_celery_worker()` - Integration with Celery
|
|
- `test_multiple_concurrent_analyses()` - Session isolation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Issue: AI Agent Testing
|
|
**Priority**: High
|
|
**Effort**: Large
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
AI agent (Claude/GPT) has no test coverage. Need tests for:
|
|
- SWOT analysis generation
|
|
- Tool use (Reddit intelligence)
|
|
- Fallback behavior when APIs fail
|
|
- Rate limiting handling
|
|
- Output validation
|
|
|
|
**Current Coverage**: None
|
|
**Gap**: Core business logic untested
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_swot_agent_generates_valid_analysis()` - Mock API responses
|
|
- `test_swot_agent_tool_use()` - Verify Reddit tool integration
|
|
- `test_swot_agent_handles_api_errors()` - Error handling
|
|
- `test_swot_agent_validates_output()` - Pydantic validation
|
|
- `test_swot_agent_retries()` - Retry logic on failures
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Issue: HTMX OOB Swap DOM Validation
|
|
**Priority**: Medium
|
|
**Effort**: Medium
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
Current tests verify HTML content but don't validate DOM structure for OOB swaps.
|
|
|
|
**Current Coverage**: Response HTML contains expected strings
|
|
**Gap**: No validation that OOB swaps produce correct DOM structure
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_status_oob_swap_creates_correct_dom()` - Parse HTML, verify structure
|
|
- `test_status_timeline_container_has_correct_id()` - Regression test for #status-timeline
|
|
- `test_multiple_oob_swaps_append_correctly()` - Sequential swaps
|
|
|
|
**Tools**: Use BeautifulSoup or lxml to parse HTML and validate structure
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🔒 Security Testing
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Input Validation and Sanitization
|
|
**Priority**: High
|
|
**Effort**: Small
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
Need tests for malicious input handling.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- SQL injection attempts (parameterized queries should prevent)
|
|
- XSS in entity names
|
|
- SSRF via URL inputs
|
|
- Path traversal in file operations
|
|
- Secrets leakage in logs/errors
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_sql_injection_prevention()` - Try SQL injection payloads
|
|
- `test_xss_prevention_in_templates()` - Verify template escaping
|
|
- `test_ssrf_protection()` - Block internal IPs, localhost
|
|
- `test_no_secrets_in_logs()` - Verify API keys not logged
|
|
- `test_rate_limiting()` - Prevent abuse
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Issue: PDF Security Testing
|
|
**Priority**: Medium
|
|
**Effort**: Small
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
PDF generation could have security implications.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- PDF bomb (extremely large file generation)
|
|
- Memory exhaustion via large SWOT lists
|
|
- Malicious input in PDF content
|
|
- Cache poisoning
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_pdf_size_limits()` - Reject oversized content
|
|
- `test_pdf_generation_timeout()` - Prevent hanging
|
|
- `test_pdf_cache_isolation()` - Prevent session leakage
|
|
- `test_pdf_content_sanitization()` - No script injection
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ⚡ Performance Testing
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Load Testing
|
|
**Priority**: Medium
|
|
**Effort**: Large
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
No performance tests exist.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- Concurrent requests handling
|
|
- Database connection pooling
|
|
- Cache effectiveness
|
|
- Memory leaks
|
|
- Celery queue saturation
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_concurrent_analysis_requests()` - Locust or pytest-benchmark
|
|
- `test_database_connection_limits()` - Connection pool testing
|
|
- `test_cache_hit_ratio()` - Verify caching effectiveness
|
|
- `test_memory_usage_stable()` - Check for leaks
|
|
- `test_celery_worker_capacity()` - Queue performance
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Issue: PDF Cache Performance
|
|
**Priority**: Medium
|
|
**Effort**: Small
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
PDF cache has no memory limits or eviction policy.
|
|
|
|
**Current Coverage**: Basic cache operations tested
|
|
**Gap**: No tests for cache limits, eviction, memory pressure
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_pdf_cache_max_size_limit()` - Enforce max cache size
|
|
- `test_pdf_cache_eviction_policy()` - LRU or FIFO
|
|
- `test_pdf_cache_memory_usage()` - Monitor memory consumption
|
|
- `test_pdf_cache_cleanup_effectiveness()` - Verify old entries removed
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🗄️ Database Testing
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Database Operations
|
|
**Priority**: Medium
|
|
**Effort**: Medium
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
No tests for database operations.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- SWOT analysis persistence
|
|
- Database migrations
|
|
- Query performance
|
|
- Transaction handling
|
|
- Concurrent writes
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_save_swot_analysis_to_db()` - Persist results
|
|
- `test_retrieve_swot_analysis_from_db()` - Load by ID
|
|
- `test_database_transaction_rollback()` - Error handling
|
|
- `test_concurrent_database_writes()` - Race conditions
|
|
- `test_database_migration_reversibility()` - Up/down migrations
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🎨 Frontend Testing
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Jinjax Component Testing
|
|
**Priority**: Low
|
|
**Effort**: Small
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
Jinjax components have no direct tests.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- StatusItem component rendering
|
|
- StatusTimeline component rendering
|
|
- Component parameter validation
|
|
- Template syntax errors
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_status_item_component_renders()` - Direct component test
|
|
- `test_status_timeline_component_renders()` - Container test
|
|
- `test_component_with_invalid_params()` - Error handling
|
|
- `test_all_referenced_templates_exist()` - Regression prevention
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Accessibility Testing
|
|
**Priority**: Medium
|
|
**Effort**: Medium
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
No accessibility tests exist.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
|
|
- Keyboard navigation
|
|
- Screen reader compatibility
|
|
- ARIA label correctness
|
|
- Color contrast validation
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_wcag_aa_compliance()` - Use axe-core or pa11y
|
|
- `test_keyboard_navigation()` - Tab order, focus management
|
|
- `test_aria_labels_present()` - Verify ARIA attributes
|
|
- `test_color_contrast_ratios()` - Automated contrast checking
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📱 Browser Testing
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Cross-Browser Compatibility
|
|
**Priority**: Low
|
|
**Effort**: Large
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
No browser-specific testing.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- HTMX behavior in different browsers
|
|
- Alpine.js compatibility
|
|
- CSS rendering differences
|
|
- JavaScript API availability
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- Use Playwright or Selenium for multi-browser testing
|
|
- Test in Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
|
|
- Mobile browser testing (iOS Safari, Chrome Mobile)
|
|
- Verify HTMX polling works cross-browser
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🔄 CI/CD Testing
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Deployment Validation
|
|
**Priority**: Medium
|
|
**Effort**: Medium
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
No tests for deployment process.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- Docker build validation
|
|
- Environment variable checking
|
|
- Service health checks
|
|
- Migration automation
|
|
- Zero-downtime deployment
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_docker_build_succeeds()` - Build image in CI
|
|
- `test_all_env_vars_present()` - Validate .env.example complete
|
|
- `test_health_endpoint_responds()` - /health check
|
|
- `test_migrations_run_successfully()` - Auto-migration
|
|
- `test_service_restart_no_downtime()` - Graceful restart
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📊 Monitoring & Observability
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Logging and Error Tracking
|
|
**Priority**: Low
|
|
**Effort**: Small
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
No tests for logging behavior.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- Log level configuration
|
|
- Structured logging format
|
|
- Error tracking integration
|
|
- Log sanitization (no secrets)
|
|
- Performance metrics
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- `test_logs_at_correct_level()` - Verify log levels
|
|
- `test_logs_are_structured()` - JSON format
|
|
- `test_no_secrets_in_logs()` - API key filtering
|
|
- `test_error_tracking_captures_exceptions()` - Sentry integration
|
|
- `test_performance_metrics_collected()` - Timing data
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📦 Dependency Testing
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Dependency Security and Updates
|
|
**Priority**: High
|
|
**Effort**: Small
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
Need automated dependency checks.
|
|
|
|
**Current**: Dependabot shows 4 high-severity vulnerabilities
|
|
**Gap**: No automated testing for vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- Add `safety` to CI: `safety check`
|
|
- Add `pip-audit` for vulnerability scanning
|
|
- Test with latest dependency versions in CI
|
|
- Verify all dependencies in requirements match uv.lock
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 Test Infrastructure Improvements
|
|
|
|
### Issue: Test Data Fixtures
|
|
**Priority**: Low
|
|
**Effort**: Medium
|
|
|
|
**Description**:
|
|
Need more comprehensive test fixtures.
|
|
|
|
**Gaps**:
|
|
- Larger variety of SWOT analysis examples
|
|
- Edge cases (empty lists, very long text, special characters)
|
|
- Real-world Reddit data samples
|
|
- Multiple entity comparison scenarios
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Tests**:
|
|
- Create `tests/fixtures/swot_examples.json` with varied data
|
|
- Add edge case fixtures (max length, empty, unicode, etc.)
|
|
- Mock Reddit API responses with real data structure
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary of Priorities
|
|
|
|
### Immediate (Create GH Issues Now):
|
|
1. ✅ E2E Test for Complete Analysis Flow
|
|
2. ✅ AI Agent Testing
|
|
3. ✅ Input Validation and Sanitization
|
|
4. ✅ PDF Cache Memory Limits
|
|
5. ✅ Dependency Security Scanning
|
|
|
|
### Short Term (Next Sprint):
|
|
6. Database Operations Testing
|
|
7. HTMX OOB Swap DOM Validation
|
|
8. Load Testing
|
|
9. Deployment Validation
|
|
|
|
### Long Term (Backlog):
|
|
10. Cross-Browser Compatibility
|
|
11. Accessibility Testing
|
|
12. Frontend Component Testing
|
|
13. Monitoring & Observability
|
|
14. Test Data Fixtures
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## How to Convert to GitHub Issues
|
|
|
|
For each section above, create a GitHub issue with:
|
|
|
|
**Title**: [Test Coverage] {Issue Title}
|
|
**Labels**: `testing`, `enhancement`, priority label (`high`, `medium`, `low`)
|
|
**Assignee**: TBD
|
|
**Milestone**: TBD
|
|
|
|
**Template**:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Description
|
|
{Description from above}
|
|
|
|
## Current Coverage
|
|
{Current Coverage from above}
|
|
|
|
## Coverage Gap
|
|
{Gap from above}
|
|
|
|
## Proposed Tests
|
|
{Suggested Tests from above}
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance Criteria
|
|
- [ ] Tests implemented
|
|
- [ ] Tests pass in CI
|
|
- [ ] Coverage increased by X%
|
|
- [ ] Documentation updated
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Test Coverage Metrics
|
|
|
|
**Current Estimated Coverage**: ~15%
|
|
- ✅ PDF generation core logic
|
|
- ✅ Basic endpoint routing
|
|
- ❌ AI agents
|
|
- ❌ Celery workers
|
|
- ❌ Database operations
|
|
- ❌ Frontend components
|
|
- ❌ Security validation
|
|
|
|
**Target Coverage**: 80%
|
|
**Critical Path Coverage Target**: 95%
|
|
|
|
Run coverage report:
|
|
```bash
|
|
pytest --cov=src --cov-report=html
|
|
# Open htmlcov/index.html
|
|
```
|