Add validation for stack names to prevent an empty name resulting in _all_
stacks to be returned after filtering, which can result in removal of services
for all stacks if `--prune`, or `docker stack rm` is used.
Before this change;
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml one
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml two
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml three
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml --prune ''
Removing service one_web
Removing service two_web
Removing service three_web
After this change:
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml one
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml two
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml three
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml --prune ''
invalid stack name: ""
Other stack commands were updated as well:
Before this change;
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml ''
Creating network _default
failed to create network _default: Error response from daemon: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = name must be valid as a DNS name component
docker stack ps ''
nothing found in stack:
docker stack rm ''
Removing service one_web
Removing service three_web
Removing service two_web
After this change:
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml ''
invalid stack name: ""
docker stack ps ''
invalid stack name: ""
docker stack rm ''
invalid stack name: ""
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Upstream-commit: d38f397da1
Component: cli
- Don't wrap the code to be slightly more readable
- Rename `getServiceFilter()` to `getStackServiceFilter()` to be
consistent with other helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Upstream-commit: 0c175fc21a
Component: cli
* Add "kubernetes" struct in config file with "allNamespaces" option, to opt-out this behavior when set as "disabled"
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Champlon <mathieu.champlon@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 1c1300bef6
Component: cli
`docker stack services --filter=label=foo=bar --filter=label=foo=baz my-stack` with Swarm gets handled as `filter on (a label named foo with value bar) AND (a label named foo with value baz).
This obviously yields an empty result set every time, but if and how this should be changed is out of scope here, so simply align Kubernetes with Swarm for now.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Champlon <mathieu.champlon@docker.com>
Upstream-commit: 297866ebbe
Component: cli
This fix was not yet included in Docker 17.05, so
API version v1.37 was not the right selector (Docker
18.03, 18.04 and 18.05 all support API v1.37).
We should change these checks for engine versions,
or use a different method to skip tests when running
against older engines.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Upstream-commit: a061b1e2d8f6117b0524e44de7b6bc391245864e
Component: engine
Before this change:
----------------------------------------------------
Create a service with reservations and limits for memory and cpu:
docker service create --name test \
--limit-memory=100M --limit-cpu=1 \
--reserve-memory=100M --reserve-cpu=1 \
nginx:alpine
Verify the configuration
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
}
}
Update just CPU limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-cpu=2 --reserve-cpu=2 test
Notice that the memory limit and reservation is not preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000
}
}
Update just Memory limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-memory=200M --reserve-memory=200M test
Notice that the CPU limit and reservation is not preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
},
"Reservations": {
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
}
}
After this change:
----------------------------------------------------
Create a service with reservations and limits for memory and cpu:
docker service create --name test \
--limit-memory=100M --limit-cpu=1 \
--reserve-memory=100M --reserve-cpu=1 \
nginx:alpine
Verify the configuration
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
}
}
Update just CPU limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-cpu=2 --reserve-cpu=2 test
Confirm that the CPU limits/reservations are updated, but memory limit and reservation are preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
}
}
Update just Memory limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-memory=200M --reserve-memory=200M test
Confirm that the Mempry limits/reservations are updated, but CPU limit and reservation are preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
}
}
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Upstream-commit: df43eb931e
Component: cli
remove unnescessary import aliases, brackets, and so on.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Upstream-commit: f23c00d8701e4bd0f2372a586dacbf66a26f9a51
Component: engine
Fixes an issue where `CopyDir` would truncate files larger than 2^32
bytes.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 616fa9446e49502da501a7d0f92b13191f5058dd
Component: engine
Sometimes docker-master CI fails on rhel4+selinux configuration,
like this:
--- FAIL: TestMount (0.12s)
--- FAIL: TestMount/none-remount,size=128k (0.01s)
mounter_linux_test.go:209: unexpected mount option "seclabel" expected "rw,size=128k"
--- FAIL: TestMount/none-remount,ro,size=128k (0.01s)
mounter_linux_test.go:209: unexpected mount option "seclabel" expected "ro,size=128k"
Earlier, commit 8bebd42df2 (PR #34965) fixed this failure,
but not entirely (i.e. the test is now flaky). It looks like
either selinux detection code is not always working (it won't
work in d-in-d), or the kernel might or might not add 'seclabel'
option).
As the subject of this test case is definitely not selinux,
it can just ignore the option added by it.
While at it, fix error messages:
- add missing commas;
- fix a typo;
- allow for clear distinction between mount
and vfs (per-superblock) options.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: d78e885326213e8ef89919c3cc6d16e712e852a8
Component: engine
The following failure is seen in CI from time to time:
> FAIL: docker_api_containers_test.go:435: DockerSuite.TestContainerAPITop
>
> docker_api_containers_test.go:453:
> c.Assert(top.Processes[0][10], checker.Equals, "/bin/sh -c top")
> ... obtained string = "top"
> ... expected string = "/bin/sh -c top"
The test case expects two processes in the output:
1. /bin/sh -c top
2. top
in the given order.
Now, "ps aux" output is sorted by PID*, and so since the "top" is a child
of "/bin/sh -c top" it has a higher PID and will come second as expected
by the test... unless the PIDs on the system are exhausted and PID rollover
happens, in which case PID of "top" will be lower than that of "/bin/sh".
Fix: sort output by process name.
* - in fact it is not sorted, but is being printed in the same order as
the kernel list PID entries in /proc directory, which appears to be
sorted by PID (see ls -1 -U /proc).
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Upstream-commit: 0823ab70990fa4cbf520726013e75c264e6c5231
Component: engine
