setup maintenance for repo #9

Merged
stevensting merged 6 commits from maintainer into main 2026-04-01 15:08:41 +00:00
Owner
No description provided.
stevensting added 2 commits 2026-03-31 16:00:36 +00:00
stevensting added 1 commit 2026-03-31 16:07:31 +00:00
Author
Owner

Call for co-maintainers @kawaiipunk @knoflook @cas @3wordchant

also feel free to look at #8

Call for co-maintainers @kawaiipunk @knoflook @cas @3wordchant also feel free to look at #8
stevensting added 1 commit 2026-03-31 16:47:49 +00:00
fauno reviewed 2026-03-31 20:25:37 +00:00
renovate.json Outdated
@ -0,0 +2,4 @@
"$schema": "https://docs.renovatebot.com/renovate-schema.json",
"extends": [
"config:recommended"
]
Owner

you can add maintainers as automatic reviewers, we tried with a team on vaultwarden but it didn't work

you can add maintainers as automatic reviewers, we tried with a team on vaultwarden but it didn't work
Author
Owner

Interesting. But does it work with single user accounts?

Interesting. But does it work with single user accounts?
Owner

according to the renovate docs you could add an array of usernames.

we tried with a team but i just realized it's a forgejo feature, not gitea!

https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/vaultwarden/src/branch/main/renovate.json#L7

according to the [renovate docs](https://docs.renovatebot.com/configuration-options/#reviewers) you could add an array of usernames. we tried with a team but i just realized it's a forgejo feature, not gitea! https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/vaultwarden/src/branch/main/renovate.json#L7
fauno reviewed 2026-03-31 20:26:12 +00:00
@ -7,2 +10,2 @@
* **Category**: Apps
* **Status**: 0
* **Maintainer**: [@stevensting](https://git.coopcloud.tech/stevensting)
* **Status**: `stable`
Owner

wasn't this a number from 0 to 5?

wasn't this a number from 0 to 5?
Author
Owner

yes it was. I now took the template from the traefik recipe, as they started the maintainers concept there. I know someone wated to create a schema for this information, but it wasn't done as far as I know.

And according to https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/025/

I propose that we adopt a "stable", "testing", "unstable" designation to help organise our recipes internally and present them in a clearer way externally.

but on the contrary there is the following in there:

The status score and README of the project should be kept up to date with relevant infomation

@decentral1se come for help!

yes it was. I now took the template from the traefik recipe, as they started the maintainers concept there. I know someone wated to create a schema for this information, but it wasn't done as far as I know. And according to https://docs.coopcloud.tech/federation/resolutions/passed/025/ > I propose that we adopt a "stable", "testing", "unstable" designation to help organise our recipes internally and present them in a clearer way externally. but on the contrary there is the following in there: > The status score and README of the project should be kept up to date with relevant infomation @decentral1se come for help!
Author
Owner

or do I misinterpret the term score? Can score also be a string?

or do I misinterpret the term score? Can score also be a string?
Owner

https://docs.coopcloud.tech/abra/recipes/#status-features-score

Yeh, we're still deep in a custom README.md format 😅 I am not sure, was the stable/testing/etc. supposed to replace the numbering or be an additional metadata? Uhm... wanna ask around? Good that we ran into this!

https://docs.coopcloud.tech/abra/recipes/#status-features-score Yeh, we're still deep in a custom `README.md` format 😅 I am not sure, was the stable/testing/etc. supposed to replace the numbering or be an additional metadata? Uhm... wanna ask around? Good that we ran into this!
fauno reviewed 2026-03-31 20:27:02 +00:00
@ -1,11 +1,16 @@
# uptime-kuma
> One line description of the recipe
[![Build Status](https://build.coopcloud.tech/api/badges/coop-cloud/uptime-kuma/status.svg)](https://build.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/uptime-kuma)
Owner

nice! but i think the ci fails often and it can be misleading :P

nice! but i think the ci fails often and it can be misleading :P
fauno reviewed 2026-03-31 20:28:28 +00:00
@ -0,0 +13,4 @@
* [ ] I have deployed and tested my changes
* [ ] I have [updated relevant versions in `abra.sh`](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/maintainers/upgrade/#updating-versions-in-the-abrash)
* [ ] I have made my environment variable changes [backwards compatible](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/maintainers/upgrade/#backwards-compatible-environment-variable-changes)
* [ ] I have added a [release note entry](https://docs.coopcloud.tech/maintainers/upgrade/#creating-new-release-notes)
Owner

should this checklist have an "I have ran abra recipe lint" item?

should this checklist have an "I have ran `abra recipe lint`" item?
Author
Owner

good idea

good idea
stevensting added 1 commit 2026-04-01 06:34:00 +00:00
stevensting added 1 commit 2026-04-01 14:53:30 +00:00
stevensting merged commit 31a4e77938 into main 2026-04-01 15:08:41 +00:00
stevensting deleted branch maintainer 2026-04-01 15:08:41 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.