coop-cloud/mumble
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 2 Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updating the mumble recipe #1

Open
notplants wants to merge 3 commits from newmumble into main
pull from: newmumble
merge into: coop-cloud:main
Conversation 7 Commits 3 Files Changed 6 +117 -45
notplants commented 2026-03-03 20:19:06 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

autonomic mumble from the old times was having issues, so decided to update the recipe to the latest to host our own

appears to be working. was able to use same port publishing pattern I was using in another recipe recently for lasuite-meet

addition of a web client was a nice bonus

autonomic mumble from the old times was having issues, so decided to update the recipe to the latest to host our own appears to be working. was able to use same port publishing pattern I was using in another recipe recently for lasuite-meet addition of a web client was a nice bonus
notplants added 3 commits 2026-03-03 20:19:07 +00:00
working on mumble recipe af87f1085d
small fixes bbbdb120b9
add backups
Some checks failed
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is failing
Details
a1a5e2adac
notplants commented 2026-03-03 20:20:12 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

the old 3 year update cycle ... I assume this is probably fine to merge but cc @3wordchant

the old 3 year update cycle ... I assume this is probably fine to merge but cc @3wordchant
3wordchant requested changes 2026-03-04 19:07:45 +00:00
compose.yml
@ -11,0 +15,4 @@
# Mumble uses its own protocol on port 64738 (TCP+UDP), not HTTP.
# Published directly on the host — cannot be proxied through Traefik
# without custom entrypoints.
ports:
3wordchant commented 2026-03-04 19:07:42 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Benefits of this over https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/traefik/src/branch/master/compose.mumble.yml?

Benefits of this over https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/traefik/src/branch/master/compose.mumble.yml?
3wordchant commented 2026-03-04 19:08:34 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Update looks good. Personally it seems confusing not to centralise port config in Traefik but 🤷

Update looks good. Personally it seems confusing not to centralise port config in Traefik but 🤷
notplants commented 2026-03-05 15:19:45 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@3wordchant ty for taking a look. I see pros/cons of each approach to the ports thing

pro of centralizing in traefik is:

  • if you show up at a new server and want to figure out the port config its all in one place to find

pro of the port config in the recipe is:

  • mumble recipe is self-contained. you can just setup the mumble env and deploy without making any changes to traefik (this is the main reason I liked this approach, as to me it made it easier to setup and deploy)
@3wordchant ty for taking a look. I see pros/cons of each approach to the ports thing pro of centralizing in traefik is: - if you show up at a new server and want to figure out the port config its all in one place to find pro of the port config in the recipe is: - mumble recipe is self-contained. you can just setup the mumble env and deploy without making any changes to traefik (this is the main reason I liked this approach, as to me it made it easier to setup and deploy)
3wordchant commented 2026-03-10 17:33:50 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Maybe let's discuss in #coopcloud-tech? I see the "easier" argument (although uncommenting 1 line in abra app config traefik... and redeploying it doesn't seem nightmarish in the scheme of things) but it feels like apps opening their own ports might be unexpected security-wise.

Maybe let's discuss in `#coopcloud-tech`? I see the "easier" argument (although uncommenting 1 line in `abra app config traefik...` and redeploying it doesn't seem nightmarish in the scheme of things) but it feels like apps opening their own ports might be unexpected security-wise.
notplants commented 2026-03-10 17:51:51 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@3wordchant want to link this PR into the #coopcloud-tech chat?

I guess for me, as I was trying to understand a recipe, I found it unexpected when there was "action at a distance" and there were also necessary related code changes in another recipe (traefik), even if small. having to touch two repositories instead of one. but I'm not sure how to weigh the approach either way for security

@3wordchant want to link this PR into the #coopcloud-tech chat? I guess for me, as I was trying to understand a recipe, I found it unexpected when there was "action at a distance" and there were also necessary related code changes in another recipe (traefik), even if small. having to touch two repositories instead of one. but I'm not sure how to weigh the approach either way for security
notplants commented 2026-03-16 15:57:32 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

more host port half-related stuff here: coop-cloud/traefik#88

more host port half-related stuff here: https://git.coopcloud.tech/coop-cloud/traefik/pulls/88
Some checks failed
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is failing
Details
This pull request can be merged automatically.
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin newmumble:newmumble
git checkout newmumble
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
3wordchant
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
3wordchant aadil abra-bot ammaratef45 Apfelwurm appletalk arjan basebuilder Brooke carla cas codegod100 coopcloud cyrnel decentral1se devydave fauno flancian Frando iexos jade javielico jmakdah2 joe-irving kawaiipunk knoflook kolaente lambdabundesverband linnealovespie marlon mayel mirsal moritz nicksellen notplants p4u1 pau pharaohgraphy renovate-bot ripclap rix rscmbbng sef simon sixsmith stevensting tobias trav val vaznasty virtualboys wolcen wykwit xynosis yksflip
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: coop-cloud/mumble#1
No description provided.
Delete Branch "newmumble"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?